BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Solomon Exports

Expert replies
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by vittalgmat » Mon Nov 16, 2009 11:45 am
Only E weakens this economists argument that country B will sell more to European countries to make up for the loss of sales to US. E says that cost of transportation will make the salmon from B more expensive than the salmon from other countries. Imagine this : in ur local grocery store, salmon with "made in B" will be more expensive than the similar salmon (size, taste etc) with a label "Made in Timbuktu". Hence ppl will buy the one from Timbuktu....
As a result Eu countries will stop/reduce buying salmon from B. ..
hence a weaker to Economist's argument.

HT Helps.
Join the discussion

by sunnyjohn » Mon Nov 16, 2009 7:25 pm
IMO:E

E states a reason why European country may stop importing salmon from country B.
Join the discussion

by 2010gmat » Tue Nov 17, 2009 7:12 am
e for me too...wats the OA??
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Tue Nov 17, 2009 10:35 am
Join the discussion

by heshamelaziry » Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:22 pm
IMO D
Join the discussion

by james33 » Sun May 15, 2016 10:02 pm
In my opinion D is the most logical one.
Join the discussion