Past perfect

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 171
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 1:02 am
Thanked: 1 times

by san2009 » Wed Jun 02, 2010 12:56 pm
Eli -

isn't the sentence saying that in 1980s Friscans mocked the claim...and then twenty years later the will made the boast a reality...i.e. the "reality" part happened after the mocking...right?
if so, we would NOT require the past perfect.

thx.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 173
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: Hyderabad
Thanked: 12 times

by vijay_venky » Tue Jun 08, 2010 6:49 am
I have a doubt. We have two independent clauses and three incidents happening in the sentence,

1. mocking
2. boast becoming a reality
3. passage of 20 years

Now according to Eli's explanation, we are considering only the second clause of the sentence and the happenings in that clause.

Why is this so?

Please comment.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 574
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:47 pm
Location: USA
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:5 members

by Target2009 » Fri Jan 07, 2011 10:57 pm
+1 to B.