-
kamalakarthi
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 10:08 pm
- Followed by:2 members
Can you please help me on this assumption question. This is from MCAT test,
My line of analysis :: - Conclusion ::There is no basis for accusation against us of favourtism
Premise::8/10 babies are went to parents who were known to one of the staff.
I am not able to understand why B is the right choice even though rest looks wrong for sure but I am not able to choose B as well.
I see all the information in B is already part of premise.
of those ...for adoption, this we already know from the passage.
most were personally acquainted with staff before application process...This also is known from the passage.
Further if I negate:: Most were personally NOT acquainted with staff before application process...Then also it makes sense that there is no favouritism
What am I missing here? Can you help me.
My line of analysis :: - Conclusion ::There is no basis for accusation against us of favourtism
Premise::8/10 babies are went to parents who were known to one of the staff.
I am not able to understand why B is the right choice even though rest looks wrong for sure but I am not able to choose B as well.
I see all the information in B is already part of premise.
of those ...for adoption, this we already know from the passage.
most were personally acquainted with staff before application process...This also is known from the passage.
Further if I negate:: Most were personally NOT acquainted with staff before application process...Then also it makes sense that there is no favouritism
What am I missing here? Can you help me.
