BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Support

Expert replies
by hey_thr67 » Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:45 am
More and more companies have begun to consume less energy by making themselves more efficient. Over time, these efforts could place the United States at the forefront of an emerging global market for cleaner technologies. Such efforts are also essential to tackling the two big energy-related issues of the age: global warming and the dependence on precarious supplies of oil. The federal government should encourage these efforts by providing the necessary incentives, whether as loans, direct grants or targeted tax breaks.

Which of the following, if true, provides the most effective support for the argument?

A: On the average, Canadian companies are more energy efficient than those in the United States.
B: Experts believe that energy efficiency could lower the energy use of the United States to the level of 1995.
C: In the past, government incentives have made advances in energy conservation feasible, especially in the auto industry.
D: The dependence on foreign oil is a greater problem in the present than global warming.
E: The market for cleaner technologies is currently relatively small because of the infrastructure requirements.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by vk_vinayak » Mon Jun 18, 2012 2:37 am
hey_thr67 wrote:
Argument: The federal government (of USA) should encourage these efforts (using Green technologies) by providing the necessary incentives.

Which of the following, if true, provides the most effective support for the argument?

A: On the average, Canadian companies are more energy efficient than those in the United States. -> Comparing Canadian companies with US companies is irrelevant to the argument

B: Experts believe that energy efficiency could lower the energy use of the United States to the level of 1995. --> The energy usage level of 1995 may be lower than that of today, but still may not be low enough to tackle the two big problem mentioned in the stimulus. Insufficient info. Eliminate

C: In the past, government incentives have made advances in energy conservation feasible, especially in the auto industry. --> This directly supports the argument about giving incentive to companies to conserve energy. It has worked in the past. Chances are that it would work this time also. Keep it.

D: The dependence on foreign oil is a greater problem in the present than global warming. --> It doesn't matter to the argument which problem is bigger. Both are still problems. It doesn't affect the argument. Eliminate

E: The market for cleaner technologies is currently relatively small because of the infrastructure requirements. --> It's not clear if the market is small because of the lack of incentives. Eliminate

C seems the best potion to me.
Last edited by vk_vinayak on Mon Jun 18, 2012 2:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
- VK

I will (Learn. Recognize. Apply)
Join the discussion

by bubbliiiiiiii » Mon Jun 18, 2012 2:40 am
Between B and C - IMO C?
Regards,

Pranay
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Wed Jun 20, 2012 6:31 am
Yes I have checked it once. The correct OA is C. No need to verify for that.

C is the only option that strengthens the argument. IF I say that X causes Y, and in the options I say or give that in the past this thing has happened, then I am strengthening the argument.

That is what it is....
IT IS TIME TO BEAT THE GMAT

LEARNING, APPLICATION AND TIMING IS THE FACT OF GMAT AND LIFE AS WELL... KEEP PLAYING!!!

Whenever you feel that my post really helped you to learn something new, please press on the 'THANK' button.
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:38 am
pls, descontructure the argument, what is the conclusion and premises. how to go to the oa.

Thank you
Join the discussion

by beatthe800 » Mon Apr 01, 2013 3:08 am
Hi duongthang,

Premise:
Companies started to consume less energy -> more efficient-> America emerging global market
This would overcome the issues like global warming and the dependence on precarious supplies of oil

Conclusion: The federal government should encourage these efforts by providing the necessary incentives, whether as loans, direct grants or targeted tax breaks.

Now you need to find answer which supports the argument.

We have to show link between incentives and efficiency-> Which is answer C

B is strong contender: but not mentioned link between incentives and efficiency anywhere.

So C is the answer.
Join the discussion