The growth of railroads---parallelism

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 234
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 5:02 am
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:3 members

The growth of railroads---parallelism

by champmag » Fri Apr 29, 2011 11:19 pm
The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local times, which was determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and differing from city to city, and to the establishment of regional times.
(A) which was determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and differing
(B) which was determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and which differed
(C) which were determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and differing
(D) determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and differed
(E) determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and differing

I want to discuss subtle parallelism in this question. I am not clear about this concept. If anyone has other examples of this kind, plz feel free to discuss.
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Legendary Member
Posts: 1112
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 11:16 am
Thanked: 77 times
Followed by:49 members

by atulmangal » Sat Apr 30, 2011 12:24 am
Hi Megha,

If u remember, i send u a pdf.."intro handout solutions.pdf"...open page no 62, it contains the detailed solution of this question....for others here is that same explanation..this is a tricky and a very good question: OA is Op E, keep patience while reading the OE

The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local times, determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and differing from city to city, and to the establishment of regional times.
The sentence is correct as given. As discussed above:

...somebody determined times... INTENTIONAL so DETERMINED.
but
times differed... UNINTENTIONAL so DIFFERING

Here's the key: 'Determined' isn't a verb here. It's a PARTICIPLE: a verb form that functions as an adjective.

The local times were WEIRD (adjective).

The local times were DETERMINED (participle acting as adjective) by...

So you need to pick the second half that's also 'participle acting as adjective'. Try them both:
The local times were DIFFERED: uh oh, that doesn't work.
The local times were DIFFERING from city to city. That works. It's a 'present participle' rather than a 'past participle',
but it's the only one of the two that's a participle at all.

It's a bit tricky to answer these questions sometimes, but the main idea behind whether to choose the -ing form or the -ed form this:

When we reduce a verb to its -ing or -ed form, we must look at one and only one thing: whether the noun that it will modify is the subject or object of that verb.

The -ing form is used for DOING the action, which means SUBJECT, which means ACTIVE voice.
The -ed form is used for RECEIVING the action, which means OBJECT, which means PASSIVE voice.
Before I go further, let me offer two examples that will make things clearer as we go along:
"¢ speaking person (the -ing form)
"¢ spoken words (the -ed form)
In this type of question, we always have two elements:
"¢ a particple, which is either in the -ing or -ed form
"¢ a noun that is modified by this participle
So, using the previous examples, speaking modifies person and spoken modifies words.
The next step is to realize that these participles all come from verbs--speaking and spoken both come from the verb speak.

Now, using these examples, and applying them to the rules I mentioned at the beginning, we will notice that if we made a sentence, person would be the subject of the verb speak and words would be the object of the verb speak. Using this procedure, we can figure out whether should use the -ing or -ed form of a participle that modifies a noun. And that's it!!
Of course, this is easy when the vocabulary is easy, and we often get confused when we are using difficult vocabulary
because we sometimes don't know whether something is the subject or the object of the verb, but this procedure that
I have explained is the only sure way to get the right answer.

In our sentence here, which replaces times, and times is the object of determined, but it is the subject of differed.

Extreme Caution: I know some of you have learned that we should only use the -ing form only for
actions that are ongoing/in progress in the present, but that's simply not true. Participles have nothing to do with TENSES. We do occasionally use them correctly for past actions that were ongoing/in progress.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 234
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 5:02 am
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:3 members

by champmag » Sat Apr 30, 2011 1:15 am
Thanx Atul,

Didn't reach that part of the hand out yet. Its an amazing document. Really informative.

Just got stuck up with the concept of subtleness in the questions given prior in the document. Googled and found an equally challenging one.

Thanks
Megha

Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:02 am
atulmangal wrote:Hi Megha,

If u remember, i send u a pdf.."intro handout solutions.pdf"...open page no 62, it contains the detailed solution of this question....for others here is that same explanation..this is a tricky and a very good question: OA is Op E, keep patience while reading the OE

The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local times, determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and differing from city to city, and to the establishment of regional times.
The sentence is correct as given. As discussed above:

...somebody determined times... INTENTIONAL so DETERMINED.
but
times differed... UNINTENTIONAL so DIFFERING

Here's the key: 'Determined' isn't a verb here. It's a PARTICIPLE: a verb form that functions as an adjective.

The local times were WEIRD (adjective).

The local times were DETERMINED (participle acting as adjective) by...

So you need to pick the second half that's also 'participle acting as adjective'. Try them both:
The local times were DIFFERED: uh oh, that doesn't work.
The local times were DIFFERING from city to city. That works. It's a 'present participle' rather than a 'past participle',
but it's the only one of the two that's a participle at all.

It's a bit tricky to answer these questions sometimes, but the main idea behind whether to choose the -ing form or the -ed form this:

When we reduce a verb to its -ing or -ed form, we must look at one and only one thing: whether the noun that it will modify is the subject or object of that verb.

The -ing form is used for DOING the action, which means SUBJECT, which means ACTIVE voice.
The -ed form is used for RECEIVING the action, which means OBJECT, which means PASSIVE voice.
Before I go further, let me offer two examples that will make things clearer as we go along:
"¢ speaking person (the -ing form)
"¢ spoken words (the -ed form)
In this type of question, we always have two elements:
"¢ a particple, which is either in the -ing or -ed form
"¢ a noun that is modified by this participle
So, using the previous examples, speaking modifies person and spoken modifies words.
The next step is to realize that these participles all come from verbs--speaking and spoken both come from the verb speak.

Now, using these examples, and applying them to the rules I mentioned at the beginning, we will notice that if we made a sentence, person would be the subject of the verb speak and words would be the object of the verb speak. Using this procedure, we can figure out whether should use the -ing or -ed form of a participle that modifies a noun. And that's it!!
Of course, this is easy when the vocabulary is easy, and we often get confused when we are using difficult vocabulary
because we sometimes don't know whether something is the subject or the object of the verb, but this procedure that
I have explained is the only sure way to get the right answer.

In our sentence here, which replaces times, and times is the object of determined, but it is the subject of differed.

Extreme Caution: I know some of you have learned that we should only use the -ing form only for
actions that are ongoing/in progress in the present, but that's simply not true. Participles have nothing to do with TENSES. We do occasionally use them correctly for past actions that were ongoing/in progress.
I think the solutions in the pdf were copied from from MGMAT forums
https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/100 ... t1787.html
I Seek Explanations Not Answers

Legendary Member
Posts: 1112
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 11:16 am
Thanked: 77 times
Followed by:49 members

by atulmangal » Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:18 am
mundasingh123 wrote:
atulmangal wrote:Hi Megha,

If u remember, i send u a pdf.."intro handout solutions.pdf"...open page no 62, it contains the detailed solution of this question....for others here is that same explanation..this is a tricky and a very good question: OA is Op E, keep patience while reading the OE

The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local times, determined by when the sun reached the observer's meridian and differing from city to city, and to the establishment of regional times.
The sentence is correct as given. As discussed above:

...somebody determined times... INTENTIONAL so DETERMINED.
but
times differed... UNINTENTIONAL so DIFFERING

Here's the key: 'Determined' isn't a verb here. It's a PARTICIPLE: a verb form that functions as an adjective.

The local times were WEIRD (adjective).

The local times were DETERMINED (participle acting as adjective) by...

So you need to pick the second half that's also 'participle acting as adjective'. Try them both:
The local times were DIFFERED: uh oh, that doesn't work.
The local times were DIFFERING from city to city. That works. It's a 'present participle' rather than a 'past participle',
but it's the only one of the two that's a participle at all.

It's a bit tricky to answer these questions sometimes, but the main idea behind whether to choose the -ing form or the -ed form this:

When we reduce a verb to its -ing or -ed form, we must look at one and only one thing: whether the noun that it will modify is the subject or object of that verb.

The -ing form is used for DOING the action, which means SUBJECT, which means ACTIVE voice.
The -ed form is used for RECEIVING the action, which means OBJECT, which means PASSIVE voice.
Before I go further, let me offer two examples that will make things clearer as we go along:
"¢ speaking person (the -ing form)
"¢ spoken words (the -ed form)
In this type of question, we always have two elements:
"¢ a particple, which is either in the -ing or -ed form
"¢ a noun that is modified by this participle
So, using the previous examples, speaking modifies person and spoken modifies words.
The next step is to realize that these participles all come from verbs--speaking and spoken both come from the verb speak.

Now, using these examples, and applying them to the rules I mentioned at the beginning, we will notice that if we made a sentence, person would be the subject of the verb speak and words would be the object of the verb speak. Using this procedure, we can figure out whether should use the -ing or -ed form of a participle that modifies a noun. And that's it!!
Of course, this is easy when the vocabulary is easy, and we often get confused when we are using difficult vocabulary
because we sometimes don't know whether something is the subject or the object of the verb, but this procedure that
I have explained is the only sure way to get the right answer.

In our sentence here, which replaces times, and times is the object of determined, but it is the subject of differed.

Extreme Caution: I know some of you have learned that we should only use the -ing form only for
actions that are ongoing/in progress in the present, but that's simply not true. Participles have nothing to do with TENSES. We do occasionally use them correctly for past actions that were ongoing/in progress.
I think the solutions in the pdf were copied from from MGMAT forums
https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/100 ... t1787.html
Yaa its possible as that pdf contains questions and solutions compiled from various resources...but the main thing is, it solves the purpose...

Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:28 am
@atulmangal , it depends because the explanation touted in the pdf was not provided by an expert but an mgmat community member gter .
The Example given to eliminate D in this sentence doesnt apply here.
X were differing
X were differed
Wasnt this dummy sentence used to discount the use of Were differed
The auxiliary verb were is not present in either of the parallel clauses in D .Where has were come from ?
I Seek Explanations Not Answers

Legendary Member
Posts: 1404
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 6:55 pm
Thanked: 18 times
Followed by:2 members

by tanviet » Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:42 am
why C is not parallel?

which were

determined

and

deffering

so, C is parallel.

C is wrong because the distance between "which were determined" and "differing" is far and we need to repeat "which were" after "and" . The matter with C is not about parallelism but about style.

hard one. pls, comment/confirm . Thank you.

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1248
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:57 pm
Location: Everywhere
Thanked: 503 times
Followed by:192 members
GMAT Score:780

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:18 am
"were determined" and "differing" are not parallel.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test

• Page 1 of 1