caffeine

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 1:47 am

by [email protected] » Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:35 am
The answer should be E.
The argument is based upon the fact that although the process of decaffeinating coffee beans is simple and not very costly,the retail price of decaffeinated coffee is considerably higher than that of regualr coffee.
The assumption the author makes is that beans used for decaffeinating does nt cost much compared to regular coffee.
If the beans used for decaffeinating was very high,then obviously it would have made sense that the price is high.
This is in fact the basis of the argument.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 407
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2009 1:20 am
Location: India
Thanked: 20 times
Followed by:1 members

by hrishi19884 » Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:41 am
Here, the only reason that reach to the conclusion provided by author if the cost of the decaffeinated beans before processing is not more than the regular one's.

Only E says that. ....other options are far way from the point of reasoning.
Hrishi

"As you sow, so shall you reap"