Panel of Health Officials

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 151
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 4:07 pm
Thanked: 14 times

by Haaress » Wed Jul 14, 2010 10:35 am
Mitch,
Is there a preference between "confusion about" and "confusion over"...is it unidiomatic to use the latter.

If I may extrapolate on this, Is it similarly idiomatic to say "debate over" and "debate about".

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Jul 14, 2010 12:08 pm
Haaress wrote:Mitch,
Is there a preference between "confusion about" and "confusion over"...is it unidiomatic to use the latter.

If I may extrapolate on this, Is it similarly idiomatic to say "debate over" and "debate about".
Both are correct, but they have different meanings. The word over suggests that a choice or decision needs to be made, that one thing needs to chosen over another:

There is confusion over whether Mary finished the race first or second. (Did Mary finish first or second?)

There is a dispute over who should take over the company. (Who would be the best choice?)

The idiom confusion about suggests only a lack of understanding.

There is a lot of confusion about chocolate. (People don't understand chocolate, its significance, the process by which it's made, etc.)

If you're debating between two answer choices, and one uses confusion over and the other uses confusion about, choose the answer that uses confusion over. It's more likely to be correct. (But use this reasoning only if you can't find a better reason to eliminate one of the answer choices.)

Does this help?
Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Wed Jul 14, 2010 12:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 151
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 4:07 pm
Thanked: 14 times

by Haaress » Wed Jul 14, 2010 12:35 pm
Thanks Mitch!

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Jul 14, 2010 12:38 pm
GMATGuruNY wrote:
Haaress wrote:Mitch,
Is there a preference between "confusion about" and "confusion over"...is it unidiomatic to use the latter.

If I may extrapolate on this, Is it similarly idiomatic to say "debate over" and "debate about".
Both are correct, but they have different meanings. The word over suggests that a choice or decision needs to be made, that one thing needs to chosen over another:

There is confusion over whether Mary finished the race first or second. (Did Mary finish first or second?)

There is a dispute over who should take over the company. (Who would be the best choice?)

The idiom confusion about suggests only a lack of understanding.

There is a lot of confusion about chocolate. (People don't understand chocolate, its significance, the process by which it's made, etc.)

If you're debating between two answer choices, and one uses confusion over and the other uses confusion about, choose the answer that uses confusion over. It's more likely to be correct. (But use this reasoning only if you can't find a better reason to eliminate one of the answer choices.)

Does this help?
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 292
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 8:39 am
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:1 members

by pnk » Wed Jul 14, 2010 2:51 pm
GMATGuruNY wrote:
I was asked specifically about answer choice E. It also contains the following errors:

The comparison is too wordy because the words it is are unnecessary. A correct and more concise comparison would be:

...whether obesity is a biological order posing serious health risks or a condition...

Also, the placement of the word more is incorrect. The correct placement would be:

...related more to appearance than to health
...more related to appearance than to health
Hope this helps!
Thanks Mitch for making things so simple. Just one more query: 'related' can come after more but need not come after than...even thn the parrellism is maintained. Is my understanding correct. Would you elaborate a bit more.

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Jul 15, 2010 12:58 am
pnk wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote:
I was asked specifically about answer choice E. It also contains the following errors:

The comparison is too wordy because the words it is are unnecessary. A correct and more concise comparison would be:

...whether obesity is a biological order posing serious health risks or a condition...

Also, the placement of the word more is incorrect. The correct placement would be:

...related more to appearance than to health
...more related to appearance than to health
Hope this helps!
Thanks Mitch for making things so simple. Just one more query: 'related' can come after more but need not come after than...even thn the parrellism is maintained. Is my understanding correct. Would you elaborate a bit more.
The proper placement of the word more depends on context and on the meaning of the sentence:

The book was written more for children than for adults.

Since a book cannot be more written, the word more is placed after the word written.

The book is more beneficial for children than for adults.

Since a book CAN be more beneficial, the word more is placed before the word beneficial.

Hope this helps!
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 292
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 8:39 am
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:1 members

by pnk » Thu Jul 15, 2010 6:01 am
Thanks a lot Mitch

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pm
Thanked: 165 times
Followed by:70 members

by karthikpandian19 » Tue Jun 05, 2012 12:49 am
Thanks a lot Mitch for all the 3 various explanations
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" :) :)---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2018 2:58 am

by atrayee345 » Wed Dec 19, 2018 3:52 am
Option (A) is the correct choice asit uses past perfect tense because major depression or its effect is continuous and both of these sentences are independent and related as we are talking about Americans. Hence (a).