Paleonotologist

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Sun Oct 24, 2010 2:11 pm
GMATMadeEasy wrote:@GMATGURUNY :
The correct idioms are either are not X but Y or are not X but are Y. Eliminate A and B.
Q1> I ignore for the moment that due to is incorrect here . Can we really eliminate A and B for those reasons ? WHy ?

"But that they are" and but they are" simple take subject of the previous clause and ,in my opinion, can we written this way .

Q2 > I would like to know the usage of "that" in "But that they are" ? Why ? I understand that parallelism requires "that " to be used if second clause is independent (I said that clause1 and that clause2), but , if second clause is treated as independent, an it take the subject of the first clase as is the case here ? in "but that they are " and in "but they are" both "they" reer to the subject of the previous clasue.
If the second half of the sentence is not completing the idiom not X but Y, then it should offer a contrast that is parallel with the subject and main verb of the first clause (paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued). For example:

Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that X...but others claim that Y...

Does this help?
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Legendary Member
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 3:46 am
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:7 members

by GMATMadeEasy » Wed Oct 27, 2010 7:20 am
Thanks GMATGuruNY , it certainly helps and clarifies another issue .

Let me ty my best to put my question again .

1. Jennifer told me that Marc ,her poor husband, is a nice person and that his mother is a wonderful lady .

2. Jennifer told me that Marc ,her poor husband, is a nice person and his mother is a wonderful lady .

Question : I under stand if claueses are independent we need "and that" in second part for parallelism. But what if second clause is independent but borrow part of subject as pronoun (in example his mother), in this case, we use that in second phrase or not ?