political parties - assumption

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 139
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 12:27 pm
Thanked: 8 times

political parties - assumption

by acecoolan » Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:00 pm
We have heard a good deal in recent years about the declining importance of the two major political parties. It is the mass media, we are told, that decide the outcome of elections, not the power of the parties. But it is worth noting that no independent or third-party candidate has won any important election in recent years, and in the last nationwide campaign, the two major parties raised and spent more money than ever before in support of their candidates and platforms. It seems clear that reports of the imminent demise of the two-party system are premature at best.
1. Which of the following is an assumption made in the argument above?
(A) The amount of money raised and spent by a political party is one valid criterion for judging the influence of the party.
(B) A significant increase in the number of third-party candidates would be evidence of a decline in the importance of the two major parties.
(C) The two-party system has contributed significantly to the stability of the American political structure.
(D) The mass media tend to favor an independent or third-party candidate over a candidate from one of the two major parties.
(E) The mass media are relatively unimportant in deciding the outcome of most elections.

The OA is A ..why not D ?
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 259
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 8:30 pm
Thanked: 16 times

by amitabhprasad » Sun Dec 21, 2008 8:05 pm
Lets break this Stimulus
Prem:
1) declining imp of 2 major pol. parties
2) mass media and not the power of parties decides the outcome
Counter premise word "BUT"
3) no ind. 3rd parties cand. has won any imp.election
4) last campaign 2 major parties raised and spent more money.
concl: its premature to think about the demise of 2 party system.

for the assumption to be valid, it should connect premise and conclusion together and in this case stimuli seems to indicate way of raising and spending money is one of the primary criterion for wining election and not favor from mass media.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 546
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:00 pm
Location: New Delhi , India
Thanked: 13 times

by ronniecoleman » Sun Dec 21, 2008 10:18 pm
Option D states that media favours third party candidature..

stimulus says: It is the mass media, we are told, that decide the outcome of elections, not the power of the parties

no way you can assume that media favours any group
Admission champion, Hauz khaz
011-27565856

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 4:32 am
Location: Bangalore
GMAT Score:580

by naveen.bobbili » Mon Dec 22, 2008 2:38 am
I am stuck between A and D.
A is stated. Anything stated cannot be an assumption.So I chose D .
GMAT:580

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 197
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2014 4:03 am

by nicolette » Fri May 13, 2016 3:12 am
The official answer is D. But I don't understand why? Can anyone explain