Absolute value is always positive or zero.
(1) |x + 3| = 4x -3
We see absolute value on the left. Thus, the left hand side must be positive or zero. Because the left hand side must equal the right hand side, this means that the right hand side is also positive or zero. Thus, 4x-3>= 0, and x >=3/4. Therefore, x is definitely positive. So, the first statement is sufficient by itself. Similar reasoning applies to the second statement.
Both statements sufficient by themselves; choose D.
Manhattan DS Is X>0?
This topic has expert replies
Source: Beat The GMAT — Data Sufficiency |
Hi TestLuv,Testluv wrote:Absolute value is always positive or zero.
(1) |x + 3| = 4x -3
We see absolute value on the left. Thus, the left hand side must be positive or zero. Because the left hand side must equal the right hand side, this means that the right hand side is also positive or zero. Thus, 4x-3>= 0, and x >=3/4. Therefore, x is definitely positive. So, the first statement is sufficient by itself. Similar reasoning applies to the second statement.
Both statements sufficient by themselves; choose D.
Isn't taking the absolute value as if it were not an then taking both teh positive an negative to it?
i.e (x+3) = 4x-3 Case 1?
-(x+3) =4x-3 Case 2? (though in this case the answer may not gave the correct value when plugged back into the original question..)
Should absolute values without taking the +ve and -ve values be taken into consideration always?
-
Testluv
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 1302
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:13 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 539 times
- Followed by:164 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi yserious
If we had this: |x| = 4, then x is either 4 units to the right or 4 units to the left of zero on the number line, and so either x = 4 or x = -4, and we definitely consider negative values.
But you would never have an equation like this: |x| = -4 because, as a measure of distance, absolute value is always non-negative. Having an equation like that is exactly the same as saying "one thing is negative four units distant from another thing". Obviously, the closest two objects can get to each other is perfectly joining each other, in which case the distance between them is zero; the distance between them cannot be negative. Thus, if we have |x| = y, we know the left hand side is positive or zero, and therefore the right hand side is positive or zero; that is, y is positive or zero.
So, we can look at statement one like this:
(1) |x + 3| = 4x -3
4x - 3 = |x + 3|
4x - 3 = (pos or zero)
4x - 3 >= 0
One tip-off that the question was looking to be approached like this is that it was asking you for the sign of x. Then, it put statements with absolute value. So, then think about the possible signs of absolute value: either positive sign or no sign.
If we had this: |x| = 4, then x is either 4 units to the right or 4 units to the left of zero on the number line, and so either x = 4 or x = -4, and we definitely consider negative values.
But you would never have an equation like this: |x| = -4 because, as a measure of distance, absolute value is always non-negative. Having an equation like that is exactly the same as saying "one thing is negative four units distant from another thing". Obviously, the closest two objects can get to each other is perfectly joining each other, in which case the distance between them is zero; the distance between them cannot be negative. Thus, if we have |x| = y, we know the left hand side is positive or zero, and therefore the right hand side is positive or zero; that is, y is positive or zero.
So, we can look at statement one like this:
(1) |x + 3| = 4x -3
4x - 3 = |x + 3|
4x - 3 = (pos or zero)
4x - 3 >= 0
One tip-off that the question was looking to be approached like this is that it was asking you for the sign of x. Then, it put statements with absolute value. So, then think about the possible signs of absolute value: either positive sign or no sign.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
-
Testluv
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 1302
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:13 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 539 times
- Followed by:164 members
- GMAT Score:800
Normally, that would be a great approach but here "x" appears on both sides, and so there is a risk that one of the cases is impermissible, that it will result in a negative absolute value. For example, if x = 0, and we sub in to the equation of statement one, we have:pink_08 wrote:Since absolute value include +ve and -ve, Why are we not considering the -ve case
x + 3 = - ( 4x -3)
x + 3 = 3- 4x
x=0
|0 + 3| = 4(0) - 3
|3| = -3
and that equation is impossible because absolute value is non-negative.
So you could have employed pure algebra but then you would have had to test the validity of your numerical results against the known equation(s).
Many absolute value and inequality questions are better approached through reasoning about the relevant conepts rather than pure algebra. And many others benefit from employing both conceptual reasoning and algebra (such as here).
(Late in this thread, I employed a similar approach on a question involving an inequality of fractions : https://www.beatthegmat.com/gmat-prep-ii ... tml#208044. And here is another absolute value question where I employed a similar approach: https://www.beatthegmat.com/value-of-y-t ... tml#201008)
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
-
Testluv
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 1302
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:13 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 539 times
- Followed by:164 members
- GMAT Score:800
Well, I would say as a very very crude rule of thumb: the harder the problem, the more likely it will be attackable through reasoning.pink_08 wrote:Great stuff testlov !
Is there kind of a clear separation on what problems to approach through reasoning and what problems thro pure algebra
However, the broader theme here is that you should be open to alternative approaches in general. The test-maker is always looking to reward test-takers who arrive at deductions that obviate the need for unnecessary algebra. When reviewing your work, make sure you review your correct answers too (not just your incorrect ones), and always ask yourself: "was there a quicker way I could have gotten to the right answer? Could I have picked numbers, backsolved, used commonsense, logical reasoning, etc?"
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
-
linkinpark
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 8:32 am
- Location: Karjat
- Thanked: 3 times
Hi Testluv,
I agree with whatever you explained for this problem, however I've one question
will I be correct if I squared of both side of equations and solve them to check x >0?
e.g.
|x+1| = 2x - 1
(x+1)^2 = (2x-1)^2 and then just solve, applying this to both stmt1 and 2.
I agree with whatever you explained for this problem, however I've one question
will I be correct if I squared of both side of equations and solve them to check x >0?
e.g.
|x+1| = 2x - 1
(x+1)^2 = (2x-1)^2 and then just solve, applying this to both stmt1 and 2.
-
Testluv
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 1302
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:13 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 539 times
- Followed by:164 members
- GMAT Score:800
Yes, you can because |x| = sq root of x^2.linkinpark wrote:Hi Testluv,
I agree with whatever you explained for this problem, however I've one question
will I be correct if I squared of both side of equations and solve them to check x >0?
e.g.
|x+1| = 2x - 1
(x+1)^2 = (2x-1)^2 and then just solve, applying this to both stmt1 and 2.
But how would you go about applying this to the first statement? How ugly would all of that math be and how long do you think it would take?
I think you have to compare the time it would take to do all of that to how much time you think it would take solving it the way I did in my very first post on this thread.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
-
amittilak
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 11:23 am
- Thanked: 8 times
- Followed by:1 members
When I approached this problem, I did exactly what you did above and got values of x =0 or x=2. However, once you get the values, you need to plug it back into the original equation to make sure that both of them satisfy the equation. This is especially true for Absolute value eqn's, with variables on both sides. x=0 does not satisfy the conditions (l3l cannot be equal to -3) and hence we need to discard it. x=2>0 is suff.pink_08 wrote:Since absolute value include +ve and -ve, Why are we not considering the -ve case
x + 3 = - ( 4x -3)
x + 3 = 3- 4x
x=0
For S2, x=0 or x=2, which is same as S1. Hence, suff.
This process takes more time than the conceptual approach suggested by the other poster.
However, if you are like me and find it easier to solve eqns quickly, you can use the approach I like to use.
-
maihuna
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1578
- Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:49 am
- Thanked: 82 times
- Followed by:9 members
- GMAT Score:720
Just doing for my own practice:getso wrote:Is x > 0?
(1) |x + 3| = 4x -3
(2) |x + 1| = 2x -1
1. for x< -3 x+3 < 0 so -(x+3) = 4x - 3 so 5x = 0 or x=0, but since x<-3, x=0 is not applicable.
for x>=3, x+3 > 0 so x+3 = 4x-3 => 3x = 6 or x = 2. So X>0
2. for x<-1 -(x+1) = 2x-1 or 3x = 0 => x=0 not applicable.
for x>=-1, x+1 = 2x-1 = > x=2
so D
Charged up again to beat the beast 
-
[email protected]
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:55 am
-
Testluv
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 1302
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:13 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 539 times
- Followed by:164 members
- GMAT Score:800
Absolute value measures the distance of something from zero (on the number line). Distance is always positive (you can't say that something is negative meters away from something else, for example). So, take "-5". How far away from zero is it?...5 units. So, the absolute value of "-5" is 5.[email protected] wrote:But tesluv.. hz can absolute values always be positive or zero. I did not understand tat..
So, if you have:
|x|=y,
you know that:
x = pos or zero
So, y is positive or zero.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
