BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG_ # 87

Expert replies
by mehrasa » Tue Sep 06, 2011 11:54 pm
Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at
r1 feet per second greater than the number of seconds
required to travel d2 feet at r2 feet per second?
(1) d1 is 30 greater than d2.
(2) r1 is 30 greater than r2.

to me, the correct answer is "c" since we will have d2+30/r2+30 compared with d2/r2
which the former fraction is bigger than the latter then the answer is "together sufficient"
However, OA is E[/quote]
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by bblast » Wed Sep 07, 2011 2:59 am
Hi, this question is not really testing RTD, but its testing how fractions vary when the same number is added to the numerator and the denominator.

remember 2 rules :

1>If the same integer is added to the num and den of a proper fraction then the value of fraction increases.
eg 1/3, add 1 to both N and D we get 2/4 which is greater than 1/3

2>The converse is true for a positive improper fraction.
eg 4/3(1.33), add 1 to both N and D we get 5/4(1.25) which is less than 4/3.

This question does tell us that values are positive but does not tell us whether the fraction d1/r1 is proper or not. So the statement will not hold if the fraction is improper.
Cheers !!

Quant 47-Striving for 50
Verbal 34-Striving for 40

My gmat journey :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/710-bblast-s ... 90735.html
My take on the GMAT RC :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ways-to-bbla ... 90808.html
How to prepare before your MBA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upz46D7 ... TWBZF14TKW_
Join the discussion

by tpr-becky » Wed Sep 07, 2011 3:03 am
This is a rate problem so start with the basic formula d1 = r1(t1) and d2=r2(t2)

The question asks if t1>t2 - you can reorganize the formula to restate is d1/(r1)>d2/(r2)

1) by itself this is clearly not enough becuase we have no rate information - eliminate AD

2) by itself this is not enough becuase we don't have distance information - eliminate B

Together the statement are still not enough. basically together we have the question:
is (d2 + 30)/(r2 + 30) > d2/(r2) When you have division and addition together with variables it is rarely enough because the relationship will be dependent on values, it is best to try some values:

For instance if d2 = 10 and r2 = 50 the question is is 40/80 > 10/50 which reduces to is 1/2 > 1/5 (yes)

But if d2 is 10 and r2 = 10 then the question is is 40/40 > 10/10 - which asks is 1 > 1 - (no)

Therefore together the information is insufficient.
Becky
Master GMAT Instructor
The Princeton Review
Irvine, CA
Join the discussion

by sl750 » Thu Sep 08, 2011 8:10 am
Answer is E, because you do not know the relationship with d2 and r2. Unless that is given you cannot conclude whether 30+d2/30+r2 > d2/r2
Join the discussion