BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

CR strategy clarification

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 12:23 pm

CR strategy clarification

by tonybasu » Sun Mar 07, 2010 2:48 pm

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

Hi,
I am using the Powerscore CR Bible book.
I have some general clarifications to make regarding CR stimuls reading and answering questions.
CR stimulus Reading:
Like Reading Comphrehension do we need to use the notebook to jot down shorthand quick notes on every sentence ? (I mean make a detail map of the CR stimulus just like short passages of RC. Spend approx 1 min for this step.)
Or:
Just read the stimulus and identify the conclusion and premises of the stimulus. Write the conclusion in shorthand. Spend 1 min for this step.

After the above steps then read and attack the question.

Please clarify! Thanks.
Surya
Top
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2193
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:30 pm
Location: Vermont and Boston, MA
Thanked: 1186 times
Followed by:512 members
GMAT Score:770

by David@VeritasPrep » Tue Mar 09, 2010 2:43 pm

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

I cannot speak to exactly what is in the PowerScore book...however I can tell you about critical reasoning on the GMAT. I have written over 100 GMAT critical reasoning questions that have been published and I also teach the LSAT, where critical reasoning is much more varied and difficult. I mention this because it is this experience that allows me to tell you the following:

On the GMAT there is usually just one conclusion in each stimulus (of course some stimuli have no conclusion) and only one truly important premise. The other premises tend to be more in the neighborhood of "background information." If you are working a GMAT CR problem from start to finish, taking notes I think you are approaching it incorrectly. Read the stimulus through once and identify the conclusion - then work it backwards, so to speak, deconstructing the stimulus and identifying the most important premise. The conclusion and the important premise - yes, in shorthand - should be all the notes you need for strengthen and weaken questions, (which together are much more than 1/2 of all the Official CR questions). Do not focus too heavily on everything that is written; much of what is written in each stimulus is not truly crucial. And remember to start and finish with the conclusion - it is the only thing that you can "strengthen" or "weaken."

In conclusion, if you are to take notes, I would simply note the conclusion and the crucial premise, rather than trying to take notes on each sentence. And remember - for strengthen and weaken questions you want to spend more time with the stimulus to have a general idea of the correct answer and look for that answer. At Veritas we have strategies for each of the various types of critical reasoning questions and however you choose to study for the test you should also develop methodologies for each type of CR question.

If you realize that the critical reasoning on the GMAT is often lots of smoke and mirrors trying to distract you - and if you refuse to be distracted - you may even find CR questions fun!

Good luck!
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1