the conclusion says : take Avian oculars on your next trip=> addresses the reader. the reader may not be a birding enthusiast.

the birding enthusiasts are mentioned to highlight the fact that the oculars have features which help in bird watching

scoobydooby wrote:the conclusion says : take Avian oculars on your next trip=> addresses the reader. the reader may not be a birding enthusiast.

the birding enthusiasts are mentioned to highlight the fact that the oculars have features which help in bird watching

Awesome Scooby !!!

Thanks a ton !!

I feel there is something with the advertisement - assumption question. There is something that the advertisers assume everytime that we do not understand.

Just like the causal reasoning and numbers and percentages section in the CR, the advertisement - assumption question is also a different topic...

Lets forget this question for a while and just assume the advertise of your favourite product lets say addidas or nike or reebok.

The basic assumption behind the advertisements of these brands is that the consumer is going to buy a sports shoes come what may...

Same for travel agents. They assume or believe that consumers are going to travel some places so just attack or target them...

Remember this is an assumption question and not inference or strengthen or weaken question...

Now come back to this question, you will find that this advertisement is specifically targeted at bird watchers and hence it is assumed that the travellers are going to for the new bird watching trip...

Experts please help for this question and let me know if I am right or wrong...

Thanks if it helps!!!

Came down to C and E, C is better!

Down to C and E. Both look equally right to me.

Please help.

Regards.