kaplan 49

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 789
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 1:25 am
Location: Southern California, USA
Thanked: 15 times
Followed by:6 members

kaplan 49

by resilient » Thu Apr 03, 2008 10:51 pm
does root (x+12) = 2 + Root X

simplifed I squared the whole thing and the book only square the left side. Is that even possible. I thought what you do to one side you must do to another side.

1. (x-4)(x-10)=0
2.4(x+10)=5x +36


qa is b


stumped
Appetite for 700 and I scraped my plate!
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

Re: kaplan 49

by lunarpower » Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:01 am
you should rephrase the statements before you do anything else, because they're both fantastically easy equations to solve. if you solve them, you get the following rephrases:
(1) x = 4 or 10
(2) x = 4


note that (2) is automatically SUFFICIENT, because it's one number; because it's one value, that number is guaranteed to give either a 'definitive yes' answer or a 'definitive no' answer.

to determine whether (1) is sufficient, just plug 4 and 10 into the equation and see what happens:
x = 4 --> rad(16) = 2 + rad(4) --> yes
x = 10 --> rad(22) = 2 + rad(10) --> no
INSUFFICIENT, because you have a 'yes' and a 'no'

note that there's no need to solve the equation, because the answer choices are so easy to rephrase!

--
Enginpasa1 wrote:does root (x+12) = 2 + Root X
I squared the whole thing and the book only square the left side. Is that even possible. I thought what you do to one side you must do to another side.
if you insist on solving the equation - which is, frankly, a waste of time, as you can just plug in the answer choices as is done above - then yes, you are absolutely right: you need to square both sides.

x + 12 = 4 + 4rad(x) + x
8 = 4rad(x)
2 = rad(x)
4 = x
so, the question rephrases to ... is x = 4?
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 543
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 1:01 am
Thanked: 43 times
GMAT Score:580

Re: kaplan 49

by codesnooker » Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:37 am
lunarpower wrote: so, the question rephrases to ... is x = 4?
Hello,
I am sorry for this but I am little bit disagreed with your solution. I have also thought the same solution but struck at the following point:-

Root (X) = ?
If X = 4, then Root(4) = +2 and -2.
So, in case if take it as -2 then the demanded condition would not be satisfied. So, in my opinion also the answer should be (E).

Since you a instructor, so of course you must know more than me. Let me know, in case of the real test, if any such condition arises then should we consider -negative value of root or not?

Thanks in Advance

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
Followed by:614 members
GMAT Score:800

Re: kaplan 49

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Fri Apr 04, 2008 9:57 am
codesnooker wrote:
lunarpower wrote: so, the question rephrases to ... is x = 4?
Hello,
I am sorry for this but I am little bit disagreed with your solution. I have also thought the same solution but struck at the following point:-

Root (X) = ?
If X = 4, then Root(4) = +2 and -2.
So, in case if take it as -2 then the demanded condition would not be satisfied. So, in my opinion also the answer should be (E).

Since you a instructor, so of course you must know more than me. Let me know, in case of the real test, if any such condition arises then should we consider -negative value of root or not?

Thanks in Advance
By mathematical convention, the radical sign is translated as "the postive root of".

So, if you see a number or variable under a radical sign, you only have to worry about the positive root.

Understanding this issue has its biggest impact in data sufficiency. Let's look at a question that would test us on it:

What's the value of x?

(1) x = root(16)

(2) x^2 = 16

Statement (1) uses the radical sign, so we know that the only possible value of x is the positive root of 16, which is 4: sufficient.

Statement (2), on the hand, has two possible solutions. If x^2 = 16, then x could be positive 4 or negative 4: insufficient.

So, even though these statements seem to be providing the exact same information (if one were to make the mistake of squaring both sides of statement (1), one would actually get statement (2)), they're very different.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course

Legendary Member
Posts: 789
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 1:25 am
Location: Southern California, USA
Thanked: 15 times
Followed by:6 members

ok

by resilient » Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:33 pm
I guess I am asking for the key to life. But how did you know to automatically backsolve. I have a bad habit of trying to plow through a question but if I just stepped back to analyze the complete situation, I would have had a nice answer.

I am learning the rephrasing is key! And on DS, success hinges on Rephrasing.
Appetite for 700 and I scraped my plate!