SC - SV agreement

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pm
Thanked: 165 times
Followed by:70 members

SC - SV agreement

by karthikpandian19 » Mon Jul 02, 2012 7:15 pm
The villagers' sighting ghosts and demons during the Salem witch trials of 1692 have been attributed by many present psychologists and physicians to mass hysteria and psychosomatic disorders.


(A) sighting ghosts and demons during the Salem witch trials of 1692 have been

(B) sighting of ghosts and demons during the Salem witch trials of 1692 have been

(C) sightings of ghosts and demons during the Salem witch trials of 1692 has been

(D) sighting ghosts and demons during the Salem witch trials of 1692 has been

(E) sighting of ghosts and demons during the Salem witch trials of 1692 are
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" :) :)---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---
Source: — Sentence Correction |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 502
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 11:36 pm
Thanked: 99 times
Followed by:21 members

by vk_vinayak » Mon Jul 02, 2012 8:24 pm
karthikpandian19 wrote:The villagers' sighting ghosts and demons during the Salem witch trials of 1692 have been attributed by many present psychologists and physicians to mass hysteria and psychosomatic disorders.


(A) sighting ghosts and demons during the Salem witch trials of 1692 have been

(B) sighting of ghosts and demons during the Salem witch trials of 1692 have been

(C) sightings of ghosts and demons during the Salem witch trials of 1692 has been

(D) sighting ghosts and demons during the Salem witch trials of 1692 has been. Shouldn't it be The Villagers' sighting of ghosts and demons instead of The Villagers' sighting ghosts and demons ?

(E) sighting of ghosts and demons during the Salem witch trials of 1692 are
- VK

I will (Learn. Recognize. Apply)

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pm
Thanked: 165 times
Followed by:70 members

by karthikpandian19 » Mon Jul 02, 2012 9:02 pm
Once you raise the doubt i am confused......Me too thinking on the same lines of you.......
But this is as per the source Knewton


Can any GMAT Experts clarify?


vk_vinayak wrote:
karthikpandian19 wrote:The villagers' sighting ghosts and demons during the Salem witch trials of 1692 have been attributed by many present psychologists and physicians to mass hysteria and psychosomatic disorders.


(A) sighting ghosts and demons during the Salem witch trials of 1692 have been

(B) sighting of ghosts and demons during the Salem witch trials of 1692 have been

(C) sightings of ghosts and demons during the Salem witch trials of 1692 has been

(D) sighting ghosts and demons during the Salem witch trials of 1692 has been. Shouldn't it be The Villagers' sighting of ghosts and demons instead of The Villagers' sighting ghosts and demons ?

(E) sighting of ghosts and demons during the Salem witch trials of 1692 are
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" :) :)---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pm
Thanked: 165 times
Followed by:70 members

by karthikpandian19 » Mon Jul 02, 2012 9:09 pm
Btwn the OA is D

and OE is

In this sentence, the subject sighting is a gerund (it stands for "the act of sighting") and so functions as a singular noun. Remember that verbals are always singular when they function as nouns and must agree with singular verbs. In this case, the plural verb have does not agree with the singular sighting.

Choice D changes the plural verb have to the singular has so that it agrees with the singular gerund subject sighting. Choice D is correct.

Choice B retains the original subject-verb agreement error. The preposition of after sighting, though not incorrect, is not necessary.

Choice C changes the singular verbal sighting into the plural sightings, but the plural subject sightings does not agree with the singular verb has.

Choice E contains a subject-verb agreement error, because the plural verb are does not agree with the singular verbal sighting.
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" :) :)---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 502
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 11:36 pm
Thanked: 99 times
Followed by:21 members

by vk_vinayak » Mon Jul 02, 2012 9:58 pm
Lucky, there wasn't an additional answer choice similar to D but containing 'Of'!

@Experts, what exactly is the difference between:

His sighting ghosts is attributed to hysteria.

AND

His sighting of ghosts is attributed to hysteria.

And when do we prefer one to another?
- VK

I will (Learn. Recognize. Apply)

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pm
Thanked: 165 times
Followed by:70 members

by karthikpandian19 » Mon Jul 02, 2012 10:36 pm
As from my understanding,

sighting of ghosts - Here "sighting" is a gerund
sighting ghosts - Here "sighting" is a participle.....

But i would like experts to clarify the statement and concept, as this would require adding the "of" in the answer choice D. (becoz the answer choice D, as of now is Plural subject with singular verb)

vk_vinayak wrote:Lucky, there wasn't an additional answer choice similar to D but containing 'Of'!

@Experts, what exactly is the difference between:

His sighting ghosts is attributed to hysteria.

AND

His sighting of ghosts is attributed to hysteria.

And when do we prefer one to another?
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" :) :)---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1248
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:57 pm
Location: Everywhere
Thanked: 503 times
Followed by:192 members
GMAT Score:780

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:13 am
In "sighting ghosts," sighting is not a participle; a participle is a verb form used as an adjective. It's still a gerund, modified by the possessive "villagers' ".
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:30 am
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Sun Jul 08, 2012 7:28 pm
i received a private message about this thread.
vk_vinayak wrote:Lucky, there wasn't an additional answer choice similar to D but containing 'Of'!

@Experts, what exactly is the difference between:

His sighting ghosts is attributed to hysteria.

AND

His sighting of ghosts is attributed to hysteria.

And when do we prefer one to another?
ok ... make sure you get this first:

THIS DIFFERENCE WILL NOT BE TESTED ON THE EXAM. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE EXAM, YOU DO NOT HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT IT.

--

this is a very "writerly" difference, waaaayyy beyond the scope of anything that is going to be tested on the gmat. however, because (a) i'm a writer and (b) i like talking about things that aren't the same all the time, i will go ahead and give you a discussion.

basically, this is the difference:

1/
possessive + VERBing + object
--> used to discuss the notion that this actually happened, not the way in which it happened.
vs.
2/
possessive + VERBing + of + object
--> used to discuss HOW it happened, rather than the simple fact that it did.

e.g.
Your playing that song was a disgrace.
--> this means that the the fact that you played the song in the first place was disgraceful. i.e., even if you played the song with absolute technical perfection, it's still a disgrace that you played it at all.
vs.
Your playing of that song was a disgrace.
--> this means that you really screwed up the song. your decision to play the song itself wasn't disgraceful, but your awful technique was.

another example:
Your singing the national anthem made me cry with emotion.
--> i cried just because it was the national anthem itself; i.e., i cried because of what the anthem stands for, not because of how you sang it.
Your singing of the national anthem made me cry with emotion.
--> i cried because of how you sang it. (... with such feeling, or whatever.)

--

also note that, if there's a dedicated noun form of the verb (like "treatment" instead of "treating", etc.), then that's the form that will appear in #2, but NOT in #1.

e.g.
The doctor's treating foreign patients was controversial.
--> you still use -ING here
--> this sentence means that it was controversial for the doctor to treat these patients at all, regardless of how he/she actually treated them.

The doctor's treatment of foreign patients was controversial.
--> here, you use the dedicated noun form "treatment"
--> this sentence means that the way in which the doctor treated the patients was controversial.

--

again, you don't have to know any of the above, but i enjoy the occasional discussion of "writerly" stuff.

also -- i've noticed that, if the title of the thread is "good problem from [source]" -- like the thread cited above -- then it is exponentially more likely that we are actually dealing with a bad problem. specifically, a problem that tests Things You Simply Don't Have To Know.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 502
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 11:36 pm
Thanked: 99 times
Followed by:21 members

by vk_vinayak » Sun Jul 08, 2012 8:38 pm
lunarpower wrote: ok ... make sure you get this first:

THIS DIFFERENCE WILL NOT BE TESTED ON THE EXAM. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE EXAM, YOU DO NOT HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT IT.
Ron, thanks for the explanation and advice. Now I know the "difference" (though it gets fizzled out in seconds in my head) between these two usages, and relieved that this "difference" will not be tested on the GMAC. Phew!
- VK

I will (Learn. Recognize. Apply)

• Page 1 of 1