Set K

Expert replies

DevitaN: Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts; Posts: 28; Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 8:25 am; Thanked: 2 times

by DevitaN » Fri Sep 23, 2011 5:32 am

Question:

K is a set of numbers such that

(i) if x is in K, then -x is in K, and

(ii) if each of x and y is in K, then xy is in K

Is 12 in K?

(1) 2 is in K

(3) 3 is in K

Couldn't the set therefore be:

-6 -3 -2 0 2 3 6 ?? Which shows 12 isn't in set and it's easy to find a set with 12 in it.

Why is the correct answer C and not E. The books explanation was at most vague.

Thanks!

Like this post

Source: Beat The GMAT — Problem Solving | Fri Sep 23, 2011 5:32 am

knight247: Legendary Member; Posts: 504; Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2011 1:40 pmFollowed by: 11 members; Thanked: 114 times

by knight247 » Fri Sep 23, 2011 5:39 am

(1) Statement 1 says 2 is in k. Obviously implying that -2 is in k. So if 2 and -2 are in k then -4 also has to be in k(rememeber if x and y are in k then xy also is in k)
So, we have 2,-2 and -4. But this info is insufficient to prove 12 is in k.
(2)3 is in k. So -3 has to be in k. Also -9 has to be in k. So k has 3,-3 and -9. However, this is also insufficient to prove 12 is in k.

Combining both we know that k has 2,-2 -4 and 3,-3,-9. Consider the case of only -4 and -3. If x and y are in k then xy is in k. So if -4 and -3 are in k then (-4)*(-3)=12 will also be in k.
Hence C

Like this post

GMAT/MBA Expert

Brent@GMATPrepNow: GMAT Instructor; Posts: 16207; Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pmFollowed by: 1268 members; Location: Vancouver, BC; Thanked: 5254 times; GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Fri Sep 23, 2011 6:01 am

DevitaN wrote:
Couldn't the set therefore be:

-6 -3 -2 0 2 3 6 ?? Which shows 12 isn't in set and it's easy to find a set with 12 in it.

This set is incomplete.
Rule ii says that, if each of x and y is in K, then xy is in K. So, since you have 2 and 6 in the set, it must also be true that (2)(6) is in the set. So, 12 is definitely in the set.

knight247's solution is great.

Cheers,
Brent

Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com

Like this post

DevitaN: Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts; Posts: 28; Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 8:25 am; Thanked: 2 times

by DevitaN » Fri Sep 23, 2011 6:07 am

knight247 wrote:(1) Statement 1 says 2 is in k. Obviously implying that -2 is in k. So if 2 and -2 are in k then -4 also has to be in k(rememeber if x and y are in k then xy also is in k)
So, we have 2,-2 and -4. But this info is insufficient to prove 12 is in k.
(2)3 is in k. So -3 has to be in k. Also -9 has to be in k. So k has 3,-3 and -9. However, this is also insufficient to prove 12 is in k.

Combining both we know that k has 2,-2 -4 and 3,-3,-9. Consider the case of only -4 and -3. If x and y are in k then xy is in k. So if -4 and -3 are in k then (-4)*(-3)=12 will also be in k.
Hence C

Thanks

Forgive my stupidity, but couldn't x or y be -2 or 2? So x*y = -4 if y=2 and x=-2 or x=-2 and y=2. So by saying 12 must be in the equation, isn't that like saying xy*(Y (3 or -3) or X (3 or -3)) so it would be x*y^2?

So i suppose basically my question is why must either x or y be -4. I feel like in the end 12 can be in the equation and doesn't have to be in the equation, thereby proving insufficient.

Sorry again for my thick headedness. I appreciate you taking the time to help me with this!

Like this post

DevitaN: Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts; Posts: 28; Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 8:25 am; Thanked: 2 times

by DevitaN » Fri Sep 23, 2011 6:10 am

Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
DevitaN wrote:
Couldn't the set therefore be:

-6 -3 -2 0 2 3 6 ?? Which shows 12 isn't in set and it's easy to find a set with 12 in it.
This set is incomplete.
Rule ii says that, if each of x and y is in K, then xy is in K. So, since you have 2 and 6 in the set, it must also be true that (2)(6) is in the set. So, 12 is definitely in the set.

knight247's solution is great.

Cheers,
Brent

Okay, so basically it's saying if 2 numbers are in a set, than their products are in the set...it's not having you specify an x and a y and ensuring their products are in the set? It's simply referring to any 2 numbers in the set?

If my statement is correct then I understand and thank you both!!

Like this post

GMAT/MBA Expert

Brent@GMATPrepNow: GMAT Instructor; Posts: 16207; Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pmFollowed by: 1268 members; Location: Vancouver, BC; Thanked: 5254 times; GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Fri Sep 23, 2011 6:16 am

DevitaN wrote:Forgive my stupidity, but couldn't x or y be -2 or 2? So x*y = -4 if y=2 and x=-2 or x=-2 and y=2. So by saying 12 must be in the equation, isn't that like saying xy*(Y (3 or -3) or X (3 or -3)) so it would be x*y^2?

So i suppose basically my question is why must either x or y be -4. I feel like in the end 12 can be in the equation and doesn't have to be in the equation, thereby proving insufficient.

Sorry again for my thick headedness. I appreciate you taking the time to help me with this!

Edit: Sorry, it looks like I was still writing this when you made your last post (which is absolutely correct)

There's no "thickheadedness" on your part. It's easy to confuse the roles that variables play in different settings.

The part where it says "if each of x and y is in K, then xy is in K" isn't assigning values to the variables x and y. It is using x and y to help phrase the rule.
This part could have been written without variables as well. If could have been written as "if there are two different numbers in set K, then it must also be true that the product of those two numbers is also in set K" This sentence is equivalent to the original sentence. It's just that the original version is more concise.

The point here is that we aren't saying that x and y are assigned certain values, we're just using the variables to better explain a rule.

Cheers,
Brent

Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com

Like this post

Post new topic Post Reply

• Page 1 of 1

GMAT Course Reviews

559 reviews

1168 reviews

431 reviews

359 reviews

147 reviews

5/5

5 Star (560 Reviews)

"Target Test Prep is the closest to the official version of the GMAT exam, about 99% accuracy in terms of the quality and quantity of information. The course has excellently created singular sets of focused lessons and tests for every possible topic that one could come across in the official GMAT exam."

"The TTP course maximizes the efficiency of the time you spend studying. It will take time and effort but I could almost guarantee that if you complete the course exactly as it is laid out you will get an amazing score. They also have a very responsive team willing to help with any questions you might have."

"TTP has two things that I think no other test prep company offers: A teaching approach that reinforces understanding and an attitude that will give you the mental preparedness needed to succeed on the test. TTP gives you a deep understanding of the concept you need to know while teaching you how to think."

Write a Review