BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Permutation and Combination problem

Expert replies
by priyasaibaba » Wed Jun 02, 2010 4:56 pm
Can anyone help to solve this problem?


A 3-people committee is to be selected from four couples. If the committee cannot contain a couple at the same time, how many such committees are possible?
A) 21
(B) 35
(C) 28
(D) 24
(E) 32

OA is E
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by indiantiger » Wed Jun 02, 2010 5:22 pm
Total possible cases : 8C3 = 56

Total cases with a couple =

Position one can be filled in 4 ways (we can pick one person from any four of the couple)
position 2 can be filled in one way ( to make in a couple)
position 3 can be filled with 6 ways ( 2 people have already been taken out of 8)

=> 4*6 = 24

total ways w/o a couple in the committee = 56 - 24 = 32 (E)

Please do correct me if I am wrong.
"Single Malt is better than Blended"
Join the discussion

by tpr-becky » Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:02 am
This is a combination problem so you have to figure out how many orders are possible by determining how many people are available for each slot and then multiplying them but becuase order does not matter you have to divide out all of the orders which will contain the same people - for example ABC and BCA are different orders but they are the same group of people when order doesn't matter. The easiest way to think of this is to divide by the number of slots factorial.

in the first slot you can pick any of the 8 people - so 8 possibilities.

in the second slot there are only 6 people - you already chose one and you can't pick the one from the same couple.

For the last slot there are 4 people available - from the last two couples.

So 8*6*4/(3*2*1) - for a total of 32.
Becky
Master GMAT Instructor
The Princeton Review
Irvine, CA
Join the discussion

by saurabhmahajan » Thu Jun 03, 2010 6:08 am
Friends,
Please let me know if my way is correct of solving.

3 out of 8,so 8C3=56
no couple together,so out of 4 couple there are 4 ways to select a couple,so 4!=24
therefore 56-24=32 (E)
Join the discussion

by tpr-becky » Thu Jun 03, 2010 6:22 am
yes, the alternate way is correct as well. There is often more than one way to do a problem.
Becky
Master GMAT Instructor
The Princeton Review
Irvine, CA
Join the discussion

by Thouraya » Wed Jun 09, 2010 5:56 am
TPR,

Why did u divide by 6 in the last step?

Thanks
Join the discussion

by tpr-becky » Wed Jun 09, 2010 6:33 am
Because the problem is a combination (no ordering of the elements) and when that happens you have to divide out all the extra ways. for example if you have AB you wouldn't need BA becuase they would be the same group - and you would divide the 2 ways by 2 to get one way. In other words you divide by the number of ways you can arrange the people in the group.

This is the same when you have three things in a group except the ways you can arrange them is determined by 3! - or 3*2*1=6
Becky
Master GMAT Instructor
The Princeton Review
Irvine, CA
Join the discussion