-
vishalwin
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 274
- Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2015 10:58 pm
- Thanked: 12 times
- Followed by:1 members
- GMAT Score:530
Hi,
Doubt1: I was studying past participles from MGMAT guide and I found 2 conflicting points:
5th edition: A Past Participle by itself is not a working verb.
6th edition: A Past Participle can be a verb all by itself but it cannot function as a noun.
Doubt 2:
1) Stoney NAMED the electron in 1894.
2) A venomous snake designated the emblem of the rebellion by the insurgency.
Both the sentences have subjects that agree in number "Stoney" in 1 and " venomous snake" in 2 and past participles "named" in 1 and "designated" in 2 but sentence 2 is wrong
Doubt1: I was studying past participles from MGMAT guide and I found 2 conflicting points:
5th edition: A Past Participle by itself is not a working verb.
6th edition: A Past Participle can be a verb all by itself but it cannot function as a noun.
Doubt 2:
1) Stoney NAMED the electron in 1894.
2) A venomous snake designated the emblem of the rebellion by the insurgency.
Both the sentences have subjects that agree in number "Stoney" in 1 and " venomous snake" in 2 and past participles "named" in 1 and "designated" in 2 but sentence 2 is wrong
Thanks & Regards
vishalwin
------------------------------------
GMAT Score - 530
I will BEAT the GMAT!
vishalwin
------------------------------------
GMAT Score - 530
I will BEAT the GMAT!

















