BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Fi Bank

Expert replies
by mankabra » Tue Nov 03, 2009 9:15 pm
Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy FI Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were not to be concluded

A) is expected to make an offer to buy FI Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were

B) is expected to make an offer for buying FI bank until they sign a merger agreement including provision for penalties if the deal was

C) is expected to make an offer to buy FI bank until a merger agreement be signed by them with a provision for penalties if the deal were

D) are expected to make an offer for buying FI bank until it signs merger agreement with a provision for
penalties included if the deal was

E) are expected to be making an offer to buy FI bank until they sign merger agreement including a provision for penalties if the deal were
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by noun » Tue Nov 03, 2009 9:28 pm
I got it B
reason: offer to <someone>
offer for <some action> {offer for buying}

Please comment if I am wrong
Join the discussion

by ayushr » Tue Nov 03, 2009 9:44 pm
IMO A .

they in B is misleading ..
Whats the OA ..
Join the discussion

by 2010gmat » Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:59 pm
apart from they...was in B is wrong...we need subjunctive here,,,

basis S-V agreement and subjunctive B,D and E are out

In C them is ambiguous...

hence A
Join the discussion

by mankabra » Wed Nov 04, 2009 6:20 am
OA is A.

I choose B, because i thought that deal (singular) must be accompanied by was.
Join the discussion

by deagez » Wed Nov 04, 2009 7:48 am
I do not understand how it could be A as deal is singular and were is plural, should it not be "deal was"?
Join the discussion

by xcusemeplz2009 » Wed Nov 04, 2009 9:04 am
deagez wrote:I do not understand how it could be A as deal is singular and were is plural, should it not be "deal was"?
in subjunctive mood the rules for subject verb agreement are not applied...i.e irrespective of the subject the verb is always plural...

A is the only correct option
It does not matter how many times you get knocked down , but how many times you get up
Join the discussion

buzz!

by kiennguyen » Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:51 am
anyone please explain me the structure of A. i can't choose anyone else except A but i can not understand :" a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties" it sounds weird to me.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1