BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

OG12: The play La Finestrina

Expert replies

by twinkle8 » Fri Jul 27, 2012 7:48 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

Any thoughts on (E). please explain.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Sat Jul 28, 2012 4:23 am
nhai2003 wrote:Theater Critic: The play La Finestrina, now at Central Theater, was written in Italy in the eighteenth century. The director claims that this production is as similar to the original production as is possible in a modern theater. Although the actor who plays Harlequin the clown gives a performance very reminiscent of the twentieth-century American comedian Groucho Marx, Marx's comic style was very much within the comic acting tradition that had begun in sixteenth-century Italy.

The considerations given best serve as part of an argument that
(A) modern audiences would find it hard to tolerate certain characteristics of a historically accurate performance of an eighteenth-century play
(B) Groucho Marx once performed the part of the character Harlequin in La Finestrina
(C) in the United States the training of actors in the twentieth century is based on principles that do not differ radically from those that underlay the training of actors in eighteenth-century Italy
(D) the performance of the actor who plays Harlequin in La Finestrina does not serve as evidence against the director's claim
(E) the director of La Finestrina must have advised the actor who plays Harlequin to model his performance on comic performances of Groucho Marx
The director links the MODERN production of La Finestrina to the ORIGINAL production in the 18th century.
He establishes this LINK by offering the following evidence:
The actor who plays Harlequin the clown gives a performance very reminiscent of the twentieth-century American comedian Groucho Marx -- a comic style that WAS very much within the comic acting tradition that HAD BEGUN in sixteenth-century Italy.
Note the VERBS: a tradition that HAD BEGUN in the 16th century and WAS still in use in the 20th century. These verbs imply that the comic tradition remained just that -- a TRADITION -- during the intervening years.

Since these intervening years include the 18th century -- the time of the original production of La Finestrina -- the performance of the actor STRENGTHENS THE LINK between the MODERN production and the ORIGINAL production.
Thus, the actor's performance could not serve as evidence AGAINST the director's claim that the two productions are similar:

D: The performance of the actor who plays Harlequin in La Finestrina does not serve as evidence against the director's claim.

The correct answer is D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by umeshpatil » Sun Jul 29, 2012 6:45 pm
We need to find out the argument for the theatre critic. Whatever mentioned in a Theater critics are the premises that will helps to justify this argument.
Premises:
1. the was play written in 18th century. Harlequin is a one character in this play.
2. Director says -'Production of play is SIMILAR to ORIGINAL production as much possible.
3. Performance of Actor, who plays Helequin looks similar to 20th century comedian Groucho Marks. Comic style of Groucho Marx began in 16th Century.
To extract the argument, We need to take help of available premises. Consideration of P1 & P2 says that Production has to look like 18th century Play. But Actually, Acting of role Helequin is looking like Groucho Marks, whose style started in 16th century. So, We can argue that Production is NOT ORIGINAL.
Answer: D

More detailed explanation: Q 102, OG-12
Join the discussion

by Suapplle » Fri Dec 06, 2013 4:12 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
nhai2003 wrote:Theater Critic: The play La Finestrina, now at Central Theater, was written in Italy in the eighteenth century. The director claims that this production is as similar to the original production as is possible in a modern theater. Although the actor who plays Harlequin the clown gives a performance very reminiscent of the twentieth-century American comedian Groucho Marx, Marx's comic style was very much within the comic acting tradition that had begun in sixteenth-century Italy.

The considerations given best serve as part of an argument that
(A) modern audiences would find it hard to tolerate certain characteristics of a historically accurate performance of an eighteenth-century play
(B) Groucho Marx once performed the part of the character Harlequin in La Finestrina
(C) in the United States the training of actors in the twentieth century is based on principles that do not differ radically from those that underlay the training of actors in eighteenth-century Italy
(D) the performance of the actor who plays Harlequin in La Finestrina does not serve as evidence against the director's claim
(E) the director of La Finestrina must have advised the actor who plays Harlequin to model his performance on comic performances of Groucho Marx
The director links the MODERN production of La Finestrina to the ORIGINAL production in the 18th century.
He establishes this LINK by offering the following evidence:
The actor who plays Harlequin the clown gives a performance very reminiscent of the twentieth-century American comedian Groucho Marx -- a comic style that WAS very much within the comic acting tradition that HAD BEGUN in sixteenth-century Italy.
Note the VERBS: a tradition that HAD BEGUN in the 16th century and WAS still in use in the 20th century. These verbs imply that the comic tradition remained just that -- a TRADITION -- during the intervening years.

Since these intervening years include the 18th century -- the time of the original production of La Finestrina -- the performance of the actor STRENGTHENS THE LINK between the MODERN production and the ORIGINAL production.
Thus, the actor's performance could not serve as evidence AGAINST the director's claim that the two productions are similar:

D: The performance of the actor who plays Harlequin in La Finestrina does not serve as evidence against the director's claim.

The correct answer is D.
sorry to bump up an old thread,I am confusing about this question.
How can choice D support the conclusion?please clarify,thank you very much!
Join the discussion

by Suapplle » Fri Dec 06, 2013 4:13 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
nhai2003 wrote:Theater Critic: The play La Finestrina, now at Central Theater, was written in Italy in the eighteenth century. The director claims that this production is as similar to the original production as is possible in a modern theater. Although the actor who plays Harlequin the clown gives a performance very reminiscent of the twentieth-century American comedian Groucho Marx, Marx's comic style was very much within the comic acting tradition that had begun in sixteenth-century Italy.

The considerations given best serve as part of an argument that
(A) modern audiences would find it hard to tolerate certain characteristics of a historically accurate performance of an eighteenth-century play
(B) Groucho Marx once performed the part of the character Harlequin in La Finestrina
(C) in the United States the training of actors in the twentieth century is based on principles that do not differ radically from those that underlay the training of actors in eighteenth-century Italy
(D) the performance of the actor who plays Harlequin in La Finestrina does not serve as evidence against the director's claim
(E) the director of La Finestrina must have advised the actor who plays Harlequin to model his performance on comic performances of Groucho Marx
The director links the MODERN production of La Finestrina to the ORIGINAL production in the 18th century.
He establishes this LINK by offering the following evidence:
The actor who plays Harlequin the clown gives a performance very reminiscent of the twentieth-century American comedian Groucho Marx -- a comic style that WAS very much within the comic acting tradition that HAD BEGUN in sixteenth-century Italy.
Note the VERBS: a tradition that HAD BEGUN in the 16th century and WAS still in use in the 20th century. These verbs imply that the comic tradition remained just that -- a TRADITION -- during the intervening years.

Since these intervening years include the 18th century -- the time of the original production of La Finestrina -- the performance of the actor STRENGTHENS THE LINK between the MODERN production and the ORIGINAL production.
Thus, the actor's performance could not serve as evidence AGAINST the director's claim that the two productions are similar:

D: The performance of the actor who plays Harlequin in La Finestrina does not serve as evidence against the director's claim.

The correct answer is D.
sorry to bump up an old thread,I am confusing about this question.
How can choice D support the conclusion?please clarify,thank you very much!
Join the discussion

by Anaira Mitch » Thu Apr 06, 2017 5:33 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
nhai2003 wrote:Theater Critic: The play La Finestrina, now at Central Theater, was written in Italy in the eighteenth century. The director claims that this production is as similar to the original production as is possible in a modern theater. Although the actor who plays Harlequin the clown gives a performance very reminiscent of the twentieth-century American comedian Groucho Marx, Marx's comic style was very much within the comic acting tradition that had begun in sixteenth-century Italy.

The considerations given best serve as part of an argument that
(A) modern audiences would find it hard to tolerate certain characteristics of a historically accurate performance of an eighteenth-century play
(B) Groucho Marx once performed the part of the character Harlequin in La Finestrina
(C) in the United States the training of actors in the twentieth century is based on principles that do not differ radically from those that underlay the training of actors in eighteenth-century Italy
(D) the performance of the actor who plays Harlequin in La Finestrina does not serve as evidence against the director's claim
(E) the director of La Finestrina must have advised the actor who plays Harlequin to model his performance on comic performances of Groucho Marx
The director links the MODERN production of La Finestrina to the ORIGINAL production in the 18th century.
He establishes this LINK by offering the following evidence:
The actor who plays Harlequin the clown gives a performance very reminiscent of the twentieth-century American comedian Groucho Marx -- a comic style that WAS very much within the comic acting tradition that HAD BEGUN in sixteenth-century Italy.
Note the VERBS: a tradition that HAD BEGUN in the 16th century and WAS still in use in the 20th century. These verbs imply that the comic tradition remained just that -- a TRADITION -- during the intervening years.

Since these intervening years include the 18th century -- the time of the original production of La Finestrina -- the performance of the actor STRENGTHENS THE LINK between the MODERN production and the ORIGINAL production.
Thus, the actor's performance could not serve as evidence AGAINST the director's claim that the two productions are similar:

D: The performance of the actor who plays Harlequin in La Finestrina does not serve as evidence against the director's claim.

The correct answer is D.
Hello Mitch,

Can you please describe the category of this problem whether it falls under strengthening or drawing conclusion?
Join the discussion

by jabhatta » Fri Mar 23, 2018 2:38 pm
GMATGuruNY wrote:
nhai2003 wrote:Theater Critic: The play La Finestrina, now at Central Theater, was written in Italy in the eighteenth century. The director claims that this production is as similar to the original production as is possible in a modern theater. Although the actor who plays Harlequin the clown gives a performance very reminiscent of the twentieth-century American comedian Groucho Marx, Marx's comic style was very much within the comic acting tradition that had begun in sixteenth-century Italy.

The considerations given best serve as part of an argument that
(A) modern audiences would find it hard to tolerate certain characteristics of a historically accurate performance of an eighteenth-century play
(B) Groucho Marx once performed the part of the character Harlequin in La Finestrina
(C) in the United States the training of actors in the twentieth century is based on principles that do not differ radically from those that underlay the training of actors in eighteenth-century Italy
(D) the performance of the actor who plays Harlequin in La Finestrina does not serve as evidence against the director's claim
(E) the director of La Finestrina must have advised the actor who plays Harlequin to model his performance on comic performances of Groucho Marx
The director links the MODERN production of La Finestrina to the ORIGINAL production in the 18th century.
He establishes this LINK by offering the following evidence:
The actor who plays Harlequin the clown gives a performance very reminiscent of the twentieth-century American comedian Groucho Marx -- a comic style that WAS very much within the comic acting tradition that HAD BEGUN in sixteenth-century Italy.
Note the VERBS: a tradition that HAD BEGUN in the 16th century and WAS still in use in the 20th century. These verbs imply that the comic tradition remained just that -- a TRADITION -- during the intervening years.

Since these intervening years include the 18th century -- the time of the original production of La Finestrina -- the performance of the actor STRENGTHENS THE LINK between the MODERN production and the ORIGINAL production.
Thus, the actor's performance could not serve as evidence AGAINST the director's claim that the two productions are similar:

D: The performance of the actor who plays Harlequin in La Finestrina does not serve as evidence against the director's claim.

The correct answer is D.

Hi Mitch - can you please explain why C is out of scope

I thought training of actors was important and had to be true for the director's claim (that this production is as similar to the original production as is possible in a modern theater. )
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Sun Mar 25, 2018 1:51 pm
Anaira Mitch wrote:Hello Mitch,

Can you please describe the category of this problem whether it falls under strengthening or drawing conclusion?
Since the correct answer must be supported by the passage -- implying that the correct answer is a valid INFERENCE that can be drawn from the passage -- the problem above may be considered an inference CR.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Sun Mar 25, 2018 2:03 pm
jabhatta wrote:Hi Mitch - can you please explain why C is out of scope

I thought training of actors was important and had to be true for the director's claim (that this production is as similar to the original production as is possible in a modern theater. )
The correct answer must be supported by the information in the passage.
C: In the United States, the training of actors in the twentieth century is based on principles that do not differ radically from those that underlay the training of actors in eighteenth-century Italy
The passage offers no information about the TRAINING of actors in the United States.
Eliminate C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion