BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
easy way required to solve this
Source: Beat The GMAT — Data Sufficiency |
please post the full equation, inequalities cannot be solved unless limits on the variables are not known
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button
Hi,
From(1): x^2+y^2>z^2
if x=3, y=3, z=4 x^4+y^4 = 162 < z^4(256)
if x=2, y=2, z= 1 x^4+y^4>z^4
Not sufficient
From(2):
if x=3, y=3, z=4 x^4+y^4 = 162 < z^4(256)
if x=2, y=2, z= 1 x^4+y^4>z^4
Not sufficient
Both (1)&(2): Use the same set of values as those used in (1)&(2)
Not sufficient
Hence, E
From(1): x^2+y^2>z^2
if x=3, y=3, z=4 x^4+y^4 = 162 < z^4(256)
if x=2, y=2, z= 1 x^4+y^4>z^4
Not sufficient
From(2):
if x=3, y=3, z=4 x^4+y^4 = 162 < z^4(256)
if x=2, y=2, z= 1 x^4+y^4>z^4
Not sufficient
Both (1)&(2): Use the same set of values as those used in (1)&(2)
Not sufficient
Hence, E
Cheers!
Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Well in that case i think answer would always be E because even if we are able to get some consistency bu putting values, we can always reverse values of x,y & z to get the opposite result.divya23 wrote:this is the full question nothing else was given
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button
observe that the exponents here are even.Hence we need not try negative values.
checking for 1,1,1 and 1,2,2.
a for 1,1,1 LHS=RHS. for 1,2,2 LHS > RHS. not sufficient.
b same as above. not sufficient.
a+b not sufficient.
E it is.
checking for 1,1,1 and 1,2,2.
a for 1,1,1 LHS=RHS. for 1,2,2 LHS > RHS. not sufficient.
b same as above. not sufficient.
a+b not sufficient.
E it is.
For Understanding Sustainability,Green Businesses and Social Entrepreneurship visit -https://aamthoughts.blocked/
(Featured Best Green Site Worldwide-https://bloggers.com/green/popular/page2)
(Featured Best Green Site Worldwide-https://bloggers.com/green/popular/page2)
For 1,1,1 LHS(2) > RHS(1).amit2k9 wrote:
a for 1,1,1 LHS=RHS. for 1,2,2 LHS > RHS. not sufficient.
Cheers!
Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
















