BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Competitive Sports

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Moderator
Posts: 7187
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 4:43 pm
Followed by:23 members

Competitive Sports

by BTGmoderatorDC » Sun Sep 10, 2017 2:16 am
It has been demonstrated that individuals, who participated in competitive sports when they are in college, tend towards remaining physically active in their later years.

A) when they are in college, tend towards remaining

B) when they were in college, are likely to be

C) when they were in college, were apt to be

D) when they are in college, are apt to be

E) when they were in college, were liable to be

Why isn't option C or E the correct answer? Are there rules on this?

OA B
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 228
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2017 1:02 am
Location: Global
Thanked: 32 times
Followed by:3 members
GMAT Score:770

by elias.latour.apex » Sun Sep 10, 2017 4:12 am
Thank you for posting this question.

When we start doing a sentence correction problem, we should read carefully for the meaning. The sentence seems to say:

It has been demonstrated (present tense)
that individuals who participated in competitive sports (past tense)
when they are in college, tend [to remain](present tense)
physically active in their later years.

The problem with the underlined sentence is two fold. First, the present tense doesn't go well with the verb participated that goes ahead of it. It seems that the best verb to refer to the sports they participated in in the past is were. Accordingly, we eliminate (A) and (D).

Now that we have three candidate sentences, we can look for the differences among them. (E) is the worst of the three, not only because the verb were is suspect (as it seems to refer not to the past but rather to a situation later in the lives of people who go to college) but also because the word liable is unclear and potentially confusing.

So now we are down to (B) and (C). The phrases likely to be and apt to be mean the same thing, so we can ignore that. The real difference between the two sentences is the verb tense (are vs. were). Do you think that we are talking about the past (people who, for example, have died) or about the present (making a generalization about the later-in-life habits of people who did competitive sports in college)?

While there's nothing inherently wrong with the grammar in sentence (C), it does not express the meaning that we find in the original sentence in the best way possible. Accordingly, (B) is the best answer.
Elias Latour
Verbal Specialist @ ApexGMAT
blog.apexgmat.com
+1 (646) 736-7622
Top
Moderator
Posts: 7187
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 4:43 pm
Followed by:23 members

by BTGmoderatorDC » Thu Oct 12, 2017 2:24 pm
elias.latour.apex wrote:Thank you for posting this question.

When we start doing a sentence correction problem, we should read carefully for the meaning. The sentence seems to say:

It has been demonstrated (present tense)
that individuals who participated in competitive sports (past tense)
when they are in college, tend [to remain](present tense)
physically active in their later years.

The problem with the underlined sentence is two fold. First, the present tense doesn't go well with the verb participated that goes ahead of it. It seems that the best verb to refer to the sports they participated in in the past is were. Accordingly, we eliminate (A) and (D).

Now that we have three candidate sentences, we can look for the differences among them. (E) is the worst of the three, not only because the verb were is suspect (as it seems to refer not to the past but rather to a situation later in the lives of people who go to college) but also because the word liable is unclear and potentially confusing.

So now we are down to (B) and (C). The phrases likely to be and apt to be mean the same thing, so we can ignore that. The real difference between the two sentences is the verb tense (are vs. were). Do you think that we are talking about the past (people who, for example, have died) or about the present (making a generalization about the later-in-life habits of people who did competitive sports in college)?

While there's nothing inherently wrong with the grammar in sentence (C), it does not express the meaning that we find in the original sentence in the best way possible. Accordingly, (B) is the best answer.
Thank you!
Top
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1