PRINCESTONE-HEART ATTACK

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:41 pm
Thanked: 33 times
Followed by:5 members

PRINCESTONE-HEART ATTACK

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Tue Jun 29, 2010 8:18 am
Medical researchers have tempered their initial enthusiasm for daily aspirin consumption as an effective means of preventing second heart attacks in men. Further studies into the possibility of a connection between daily consumption of aspirin and the reduced incidence of attack have indicated that since aspirin's effectiveness in preventing heart attacks is limited to certain types of attacks, only 50 to 60 percent of all men stand to reduce their risk of a second heart attack by consuming aspirin daily. Nevertheless, since moderate aspirin intake poses no health threat, researchers continue to recommend that all men who wish to reduce the risk of a second heart attack continue or begin consuming aspirin on a daily basis.

Which one of the following statements, if true, would lend the strongest support to the researchers' recommendation?



Fewer than 50 to 60 percent of all men who have experienced a heart attack have failed to begin daily aspirin consumption in an effort to avoid a second attack.



Failing to consume aspirin daily is one of several ways in which a one-time heart attack sufferer can decrease his chances of experiencing a second attack.



There is no way to determine accurately which particular one-time heart attack sufferers who are at risk of suffering a second heart attack might benefit from the consumption of aspirin.



The amount of aspirin that a one-time heart attack sufferer should consume varies only slightly according to the age and weight of the heart attack sufferer.



Those men who wish to reduce the risk of their having a second heart attack are not among those men who would reduce that risk by consuming aspirin daily.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 392
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 2:42 am
Location: Bangalore, India
Thanked: 116 times
Followed by:10 members
GMAT Score:770

by albatross86 » Tue Jun 29, 2010 8:42 am
Fact 1: Aspirin only prevents certain type of attacks, so only 50-60% of all men stand to reduce risk of a second heart attack.
Fact 2: Moderate aspirin intake poses no health threat.

Recommendation: Take aspirin daily to reduce risk of second heart attack.

STRENGTHENER


A. This is an irrelevant statistic. This are the people who don't follow the recommendation, this doesn't make or break the recommendation.

B. Not consuming aspirin can decrease chances - Opposite of recommendation.

C. There is no way of finding out which ones would benefit. Exactly. This is the reason the recommendation that all men who have had one attack should start taking aspirin is valid. Though they may not benefit from it, they wont be harmed, so it makes sense. Try negation test on this - if there was a way to find out which ones would benefit, the recommendation is wrong - only those who will benefit should take it.

D. Amount of aspirin is irrelevant.

E. The ones who want to reduce the risk are not among those who would consume aspirin for it. This only says that the recommendation may not be heeded.

Pick C.
~Abhay

Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it. -- Andre Gide

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 748
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:54 am
Thanked: 46 times
Followed by:3 members

by outreach » Tue Jun 29, 2010 11:20 am
+1 for c
-------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
General blog
https://amarnaik.wordpress.com
MBA blog
https://amarrnaik.blocked/