---- Philip Larkin ----

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 857
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 1:36 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:15 members

---- Philip Larkin ----

by AIM GMAT » Fri Mar 18, 2011 9:05 am
MAKE IT A TIMED EFFORT TO GAIN MAX

Although he rejected the prevailing Neo-Romanticism of the late forties
and early fifties, Philip Larkin was no admirer of modernism. Like many in
the English middle-class, for example, he thought Picasso a fake, and
believed that an artist should "•make a horse look like a horse.
When some disparaged his work as "•limited and "•commonplace,
Larkin replied, "•I'd like to know what dragon-infested world these lads
live in to make them so free with the word 'commonplace'. His irritation
stemmed from his view that poetry "•was an act of sanity, of seeing things
as they are. He thought that the connection between poetry and the
reading public, forged in the 19th century by such poets as Kipling,
Housman and Brooke, had by the mid-20th century been destroyed by
the growing unintelligibility of English poetry to the general reader. He
attributed this in part to the emergence of English literature (along with
the other arts) as an academic subject, demanding poetry that required
elucidation.

He saw no such need to explain his own work. When asked to expand
on The Whitsun Weddings, he remarked that the intent of each poem was
clear enough in itself, and he would only add that "•the poems had been
written in or near Hull, Yorkshire, with a succession of 2B pencils during
the years 1955 to 1963. Influenced by the poetry of Thomas Hardy, he
made the mundane details of his life the basis for tough, unsparing,
memorable poems that rejected the Victorian belief in a benevolent God,
exploring life with a post-religious stoicism. The poems themselves are
deceptively simple. Through the details of advertisements, train-stations,
and provincial towns, they transform into something elevated and
strangely beautiful the central issues of ordinary life in the language of
ordinary speech. His underlying themes of love, solitude, and mortality
express intense personal emotion while they strictly avoid sentimentality
or self-pity, using rough-hewn rhythms and colloquial diction with an
extraordinary variety of meters and stanzaic forms. These qualities were
quickly identified, if not always appreciated, by reviewers. As the critic
Donald Hall put it (only half-admiringly), "• [Larkin's poem] 'At Grass' is
the best horse picture ever painted.

Some critics went so far as to call him anti-social. In an interview,
Larkin questioned why he was described a melancholy man, protesting-
self-deprecatingly-that he was actually "•rather funny."– Neither of these
adjectives reflect the beauty of his poetry that is the source of a deep,
abiding pleasure.

Philip Larkin earned a living as a librarian until his death of cancer in
1985. His first poem was published in 1940, but he earned his reputation
as one of England's finest poets with the publication of The Less Deceived
in 1955, which was subscribed to by almost all recognized young English
poets: Amis, Bergonzi, Boyars, Brownjohn, Conquest, Davie, Enright,
Hamburger, Hill, Jennings, MacBeth, Murphy, Thwaite, Tomlinson, and
Wain. His status was confirmed with the release in 1963 of The Whitsun
Weddings (the title poem of which may be the finest in all his work), and
again with High Windows in 1974. The mood of each of these thin
volumes changed considerably from poem to poem; but, for all their
range, they were clearly the products of a singular and accomplished
poetic sensibility.

1. The author quotes Larkin as saying "•I'd like to know what dragon-infested
world these lads live in to make them so free with the word
"—commonplace' in lines 6-7 in order to:
A. show how Larkin dismissed critics of his work by pointing out their
personal failings.
B. show how Larkin mocked his critics for implying that everyday
experience must be trivial.
C. suggest that Larkin's critics attacked his work to make their own lives
seem more glamorous.
D. show that Larkin did not believe that the events he wrote about were
actually common.
E. show how deeply saddened Larkin was at the criticism of his work

2. The author's primary concern in this passage is to:
A. show that Larkin's verse was informed by his views on poetry.
B. describe how Larkin created verse of lasting value based on ordinary
events.
C. compare schools of poetry from the 19th and 20th centuries.
D. explain how the general reader became alienated from English poetry
by the mid-20th century.
E. criticise Larking for writing fanciful and esoteric poetry

3. The author cites the description of one of Larkin's poems by one of his
critics as "•the best horse picture ever painted. This quotation serves
several purposes, including to demonstrate:
I. that critics considered Larkin's poetry poor and funny.
II. the commonplace subject matter of Larkin's work.
III. that critics often blurred Larkin's poetry with Larkin's views.
A. I only
B. I and II only
C. II and III only
D. II only
E. I, II and III

4. Based on the information provided in the passage, we can assume that
Larkin would be LEAST likely to write a poem taking as its subject:
A. a devout song of praise to God.
B. the working day of a London businessman.
C. the death in war of an upper-class academic.
D. a current, happy love affair.
E. a day in the life of a schoolboy


OA BBDA

It took me 7 minutes to solve this passage .
Thanks & Regards,
AIM GMAT
Source: — Reading Comprehension |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 574
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:47 pm
Location: USA
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:5 members

by Target2009 » Sun Mar 20, 2011 5:14 am
My pick BBCA .. got one wrong :(
Regards
Abhishek
------------------------------
MasterGmat Student

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1101
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 7:26 am
Thanked: 47 times
Followed by:13 members
GMAT Score:640

by HSPA » Mon Mar 21, 2011 12:31 am
Hi AIM, I got one wrong.. yet again >8 min.. time is not sufficent for me here also


40-50 -Reject Neo roman
No for moderism
he is middleclass
limited/commonplace
Can look into first question: havent understood
poetry is an act of sanity
19th: good readers
20th: bad readers
he wnt poetry as an acadamic with thoguht

Para 2:
his poems are self explanatory
thomas yardy influnecd him
simple poems.. simple speech

no self pity/sentiment but love,s
these are good qualiteis

para 3: react jovially to his nick name

Para 4: his bio

1) B and D
2) C is larkins concern, B is good
3) D
4) A( about god is not every day)

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1325
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 6:24 am
Thanked: 105 times
Followed by:14 members

by vikram4689 » Tue Mar 22, 2011 5:37 pm
I got 2 wrong ...2 and 4

2. Confused b/w A & B . B describe "how Larkin created verse of lasting value based on ordinary"
events.

HOw we come to know that values of Larkin were lasting value....so chose A

4. Choose C because death of academic is not common though "song of praise to god is common"

Please post OE

Legendary Member
Posts: 857
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 1:36 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:15 members

by AIM GMAT » Tue Mar 22, 2011 9:24 pm
2 . Main point question - We should have idenfied the purpose scope and topic.

A. show that Larkin's verse was informed by his views on poetry. -- The author mentions Larkin's views on poetry and shows how they tied in what he wrote about , the purpose is broader than just to show this relation .

B. describe how Larkin created verse of lasting value based on ordinary events. -- The author is concerned with describing Larkin's verse particularly in context of subject he uses.

4. What topic would Larkin least likely to write about ? Certainly something that is not commonplace .

A. This is something intangible , lofy and not commonplace. Very imaginary , no reality .

C. This choice tries to trick you with the academic angle , death in war would seem "real" enough for Larkin's taste.


Hope that helps.
Thanks & Regards,
AIM GMAT

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 979
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 1:38 am
Location: Hyderabad, India
Thanked: 49 times
Followed by:12 members
GMAT Score:700

by bubbliiiiiiii » Wed Mar 23, 2011 10:07 pm
DBCA :( Scored 2/4!!

What is the complexity of passage and can someone shed some light on third question as to How C?
Regards,

Pranay

Legendary Member
Posts: 857
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 1:36 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:15 members

by AIM GMAT » Wed Mar 23, 2011 10:22 pm
bubbliiiiiiii wrote:DBCA :( Scored 2/4!!

What is the complexity of passage and can someone shed some light on third question as to How C?
The official explanation for question 3 :-

Review the quote at the end of Para 3. The critic is referring to a specific poem of
Larkin's. The lines above suggest that the critic is responding to the commonplace
elements in the poem. Since the response is only half-admiring, the critic is
complimenting the poem while at the same time noting its subject matter. The only
statement that fits with these various purposes is statement II. statement I distorts the critics' view, and
neglects the good half of the "•half-admiringly. Statement III is off the scope: While
Larkin's own views and his poetry were intertwined, there's no evidence that the
critics were focusing on some element of Larkin's views that wasn't in his poetry.
Thanks & Regards,
AIM GMAT

Legendary Member
Posts: 586
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 4:38 am
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:5 members
GMAT Score:730

by rohu27 » Wed Mar 23, 2011 11:06 pm
BBDA - i did get all correct in 07:49 mins

AIM,
wht strategy do use for RC's?
for this one i had to give a reading once nd then answer the questions.
i normally tend to read the passage once if the topic is to my liking(which i get to knw after i read one para)in such cases i do get most of the answers right.

but i cant rely on this technique. I have tried the technique suggested by ron(in the mainpoint questions studyhall) to read the 1st nd last paras complete and 1st,last lines of the remaing paras for longer RC paras, but this somehow scares me - i mean im not confident while answering the questions as i feel i dnt knw completely wht the passage is saying.

wanted to knw if u use diff techniques for long,short paras etc?

Legendary Member
Posts: 857
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 1:36 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:15 members

by AIM GMAT » Wed Mar 23, 2011 11:14 pm
I completely agree with you rohu , i too follow Rons approach but i cant rely on that one , i guess because of being non native speaker . I guess you too are non native ?

Personally i need to read the passage as whole i cant rely on emphasizing the first and last lines , it diverts me . Then take gist out of that para , as Ron says the purpose of para and wht its saying etc . Still i refer back to passage while answering the question , as i am not always sure shot and have to re read to confirm . I am picking up mixed approaches to see what affects the accuracy and timing , but in exam the system will definately go on Auto pilot mode :) .

Also for short paras no skimming all concentrated matter to read carefully and for long para i skip details and do skim a bit not completely.
Thanks & Regards,
AIM GMAT

Legendary Member
Posts: 586
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 4:38 am
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:5 members
GMAT Score:730

by rohu27 » Wed Mar 23, 2011 11:28 pm
im non-native too
guess we need to try diff combos while we practice and see wht works best for us for diff type of passages.
but as u said, the exam day nerves wud matter a lot on how u apply techniques especially in RC and maybe CR.
AIM GMAT wrote:I completely agree with you rohu , i too follow Rons approach but i cant rely on that one , i guess because of being non native speaker . I guess you too are non native ?

Personally i need to read the passage as whole i cant rely on emphasizing the first and last lines , it diverts me . Then take gist out of that para , as Ron says the purpose of para and wht its saying etc . Still i refer back to passage while answering the question , as i am not always sure shot and have to re read to confirm . I am picking up mixed approaches to see what affects the accuracy and timing , but in exam the system will definately go on Auto pilot mode :) .

Also for short paras no skimming all concentrated matter to read carefully and for long para i skip details and do skim a bit not completely.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 1:11 pm
Thanked: 2 times
GMAT Score:590

by viv_gmat » Mon Jun 20, 2011 11:02 am
It took me 12 mins, and I got 2/4 corrects.

I thought 3rd questions was difficult, but after reading OE..I get it.

For first question- i first selected "B", but somehow got more inclined towards D..
This happens to me many a times, I rather have to trust my first instinct than thinking too much on other choices.

As far as strategy is concerned, I'm also not convinced with Ron's strategy but it works sometime and sometime I end up getting incorrect answers. I still feel reading complete passage is better than 1st/last lines para-reading.