BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Tricky absolute question..... help needed

Expert replies
by Mo2men » Thu Aug 31, 2017 1:42 pm
Is |x+y|>|x-y|?

(1) |x| > |y|
(2) |x-y| < |x|

Source:GC
OA: B

|x+y|>|x-y|...........Square both sides

x^2 + 2xy + y^2 > x^2 - 2xy + y^2

4xy > 0 .....the question could be repharsed

Is xy > 0 or Do both x & y have same sign?

1) |x| > |y|

Clearly Insufficient

2) |x-y| < |x| ..........Square both sides

x^2 - 2xy + y^2 < x^2

y^2 - 2 xy < 0 ...............Because we are certain that 'y' can't equal zero. I can divide by 'y'. If y =0 statement 2 would be |x| < |x| which is invalid. So you does not equal 0

y < 2x

here y and x can both have same sign or different sign.

Insufficient

Combine both statements 1 & 2

still insiffecent ..............Answer is E

Where did I go wrong in the above?
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Tricky absolute question..... help needed

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Aug 31, 2017 2:57 pm
Mo2men wrote:Do both x & y have same sign?

2) |x-y| < |x| ..........Square both sides

x^2 - 2xy + y^2 < x^2

y^2 - 2 xy < 0 ...............Because we are certain that 'y' can't equal zero. I can divide by 'y'. If y =0 statement 2 would be |x| < |x| which is invalid. So you does not equal 0

y < 2x
The portion in red does not account for the sign of y.
You correctly squared the inequality to yield the following:
y² - 2xy < 0
y² < 2xy.

If y>0, then dividing both sides by y yields the following:
y < 2x.
Since y>0, we get:
0 < y < 2x, implying that both x and y are positive.

If y<0, then dividing both sides by y requires that we flip the inequality, yielding the following:
y > 2x.
Since y<0, we get:
2x < y < 0, implying that both x and y are negative.

In each case, x and y have the same sign.
Thus, the answer to the rephrased question stem is YES.
Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Thu Aug 31, 2017 5:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Thu Aug 31, 2017 4:42 pm
It might be easier to do this conceptually.

|x + y| > |x - y| can be stated as "x is further from -y than it is from y".

S2 can be stated as "x is further from 0 than it is from y".

If x is further from 0 than it is from y, x and y MUST be on the same side of zero, i.e. x and y must share the same sign. (If they had different signs, x to y would be (x to 0) + (0 to y), but with S2 that would make (x to 0) > (x to 0) + (0 to y), and (0 to y) can't be negative!)

With that in mind, the distance from x to -y = (the distance from x to 0) + (the distance from 0 to -y).

Since (x to 0) is already bigger than (x to y), we MUST have (x to 0) + (0 to -y) > (x to y), and S2 alone is sufficient.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Aug 31, 2017 5:14 pm
Is |x+y|>|x-y|?

a) |x|>|y|

b) |x-y|<|x|
A solution with an alternate line of reasoning for Statement 2:

Is |x+y| > |x-y|?
When there is absolute value notation on each side, we can square the inequality.

(x+y)² > (x-y)²
x² + 2xy + y² > x² - 2xy + y²
4xy > 0
xy > 0.

Question rephrased: Do x and y have the same sign?

Statement 1: |x| > |y|
Here, x and y could have the same sign or different signs.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: |x-y| < |x|
Squaring both sides, we get:
(x-y)² < x²
x² - 2xy + y² < x²
y² < 2xy
xy > y²/2.
Since the square of a value cannot be negative, y²/2 cannot be negative.
Thus, xy>0, implying that x and y have the same sign.
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is B.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Sep 01, 2017 3:05 am
Is |x+y|>|x-y|?

a) |x|>|y|

b) |x-y|<|x|
We could also treat this as a DISTANCE/NUMBER LINE problem.
|x-y| = the distance between x and y.
|x+y| = the distance between x and -y.
|x| = the distance between x and 0.

Is |x-y| < |x+y|?
In words:
Is the distance between between x and y less than the distance between x and -y?
For x to be CLOSER TO Y than to -y, x and y must be TO THE SAME SIDE OF 0.
To illustrate:
x.....y..............0.............-y
.......y.....x.......0.............-y
As these examples show, when x and y are to the same side of 0, x is closer to y than to -y.

Question rephrased: Are x and y to the same side of 0?

Statement 1: |x| > |y|
x and y could be to the same side of 0 or on opposite sides of 0.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: |x-y| < |x|
In words:
The distance between x and y is less than the distance between x and 0.
This will not be true if x and y are on opposite sides of 0.
To illustrate:
x.........0...........y
y.........0..........x
In each case here, the distance between x and y is GREATER than the distance between x and 0.
Thus, to satisfy statement 2, x and y must be TO THE SAME SIDE OF 0.
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is B.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Mo2men » Fri Sep 01, 2017 3:37 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
Is |x+y|>|x-y|?

a) |x|>|y|

b) |x-y|<|x|
We could also treat this as a DISTANCE/NUMBER LINE problem.
|x-y| = the distance between x and y.
|x+y| = the distance between x and -y.
|x| = the distance between x and 0.

Is |x-y| < |x+y|?
In words:
Is the distance between between x and y less than the distance between x and -y?
For x to be CLOSER TO Y than to -y, x and y must be TO THE SAME SIDE OF 0.
To illustrate:
x.....y..............0.............-y
.......y.....x.......0.............-y
As these examples show, when x and y are to the same side of 0, x is closer to y than to -y.

Dear Mitch,

Thanks for your wonderful approaches you presented.

Should not the illustration be as follows:

x...-y..............0.............y
.....-y.....x.......0.............y

Thanks
Join the discussion

Tricky absolute question..... help needed

by GMATGuruNY » Sun Sep 03, 2017 3:08 am
Mo2men wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote:
Is |x+y|>|x-y|?

a) |x|>|y|

b) |x-y|<|x|
We could also treat this as a DISTANCE/NUMBER LINE problem.
|x-y| = the distance between x and y.
|x+y| = the distance between x and -y.
|x| = the distance between x and 0.

Is |x-y| < |x+y|?
In words:
Is the distance between between x and y less than the distance between x and -y?
For x to be CLOSER TO Y than to -y, x and y must be TO THE SAME SIDE OF 0.
To illustrate:
x.....y..............0.............-y
.......y.....x.......0.............-y

As these examples show, when x and y are to the same side of 0, x is closer to y than to -y.
Dear Mitch,

Thanks for your wonderful approaches you presented.

Should not the illustration be as follows:

x...-y..............0.............y
.....-y.....x.......0.............y


Thanks
In the blue illustration, x and y are both to the left of 0, implying that x and y are both negative.
Since y is negative, -y > 0, with the result that -y is to the right of 0.
The blue illustration positions x closer to y than to -y.
Since the distance between x and -y is greater than the distance between x and y, the following inequality is implied:
|x+y | > |x-y|.
Thus, the blue illustration accurately reflects the question stem.

In the red illustration, x and y are to different sides of 0, with the result that x is closer to -y and than to y.
Since the distance between x and -y is less than the distance between x and y, the following inequality is implied:
|x+y | < |x-y|.
Thus, the red illustration does not accurately reflect the question stem.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Mo2men » Sun Sep 03, 2017 8:59 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
Mo2men wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote:
Is |x+y|>|x-y|?

a) |x|>|y|

b) |x-y|<|x|
We could also treat this as a DISTANCE/NUMBER LINE problem.
|x-y| = the distance between x and y.
|x+y| = the distance between x and -y.
|x| = the distance between x and 0.

Is |x-y| < |x+y|?
In words:
Is the distance between between x and y less than the distance between x and -y?
For x to be CLOSER TO Y than to -y, x and y must be TO THE SAME SIDE OF 0.
To illustrate:
x.....y..............0.............-y
.......y.....x.......0.............-y

As these examples show, when x and y are to the same side of 0, x is closer to y than to -y.
Dear Mitch,

Thanks for your wonderful approaches you presented.

Should not the illustration be as follows:

x...-y..............0.............y
.....-y.....x.......0.............y


Thanks
In the blue illustration, x and y are both to the left of 0, implying that x and y are both negative.
Since y is negative, -y > 0, with the result that -y is to the right of 0.
The blue illustration positions x closer to y than to -y.
Since the distance between x and -y is greater than the distance between x and y, the following inequality is implied:
|x+y | > |x-y|.
Thus, the blue illustration accurately reflects the question stem.

In the red illustration, x and y are to different sides of 0, with the result that x is closer to -y and than to y.
Since the distance between x and -y is less than the distance between x and y, the following inequality is implied:
|x+y | < |x-y|.
Thus, the red illustration does not accurately reflect the question stem.
Thanks Mitch for your awesome explanation.
Join the discussion