SC problem: When rates were raised in 1985

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 2:47 pm
Location: Shanghai
Thanked: 2 times
GMAT Score:550

SC problem: When rates were raised in 1985

by fx678 » Thu Mar 25, 2010 7:42 pm
Please delete this post anyway if discussion on the problem already exists.

When rates were raised in 1985, postal service officials predicted they would make further rate increases unnecessary for at least three years.

(A) they would make further rate increases unnecessary
(B) they would mean that further rate increases would not be needed
(C) that it would not be necessary for further rate increases
(D) that the increase would make further rate increase unnecessary
(E) further rate increases will not be needed

OA is D

Could anyone tell me if the "that" is omittable in the clause? Thanks~
No pain, no gain.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 537
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:15 am
Location: Nagpur , India
Thanked: 41 times
Followed by:1 members

by rockeyb » Thu Mar 25, 2010 8:22 pm
Although this has been posted earlier , I did not find the explanation good enough . So here it goes .


The sentence is checking verb tense and mood .

Mood here is subjunctive .

PREDICTED = subjunctive and as per rule SUBJUNCTIVE + THAT + Bare form of verb TO BE .
Could anyone tell me if the "that" is omittable in the clause?
So if you see the above rule . THAT can not be omitted .

But there are some subjunctives that need infinitive OR THAT or both .

Ex : The commissioner ALLOWED the members TO BE in the room .

So since THAT is needed we can eliminate A, B and E straight away .

Between (C) and (D) .

In (C) IT has no antecedent .

The only correct answer is D.
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"

User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 2:47 pm
Location: Shanghai
Thanked: 2 times
GMAT Score:550

by fx678 » Thu Mar 25, 2010 9:15 pm
Thank you very much for your reply, rockeyb. My classmate said that it should be an objective clause, but I was not sure if it checks the subjunctive mood.
No pain, no gain.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 537
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:15 am
Location: Nagpur , India
Thanked: 41 times
Followed by:1 members

by rockeyb » Thu Mar 25, 2010 9:22 pm
fx678 wrote:Thank you very much for your reply, rockeyb. My classmate said that it should be an objective clause, but I was not sure if it checks the subjunctive mood.
Well it certainly dose check for subjunctive .

Check MGMAT SC book for better understanding .

Cheers !!! :)
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 106
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 8:04 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by sanyalpritish » Thu Mar 25, 2010 9:31 pm
Well I was stuck between C and D, I agree It does not have a antecedent, but the meaning in D is not clear it says the " "increase would make further rate increase unnecessary " how can increase make anything.

If any one clarify this it will be great.

Can you please state the source of this question

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 537
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:15 am
Location: Nagpur , India
Thanked: 41 times
Followed by:1 members

by rockeyb » Thu Mar 25, 2010 9:43 pm
sanyalpritish wrote:Well I was stuck between C and D, I agree It does not have a antecedent, but the meaning in D is not clear it says the " "increase would make further rate increase unnecessary " how can increase make anything.

If any one clarify this it will be great.

Can you please state the source of this question
Have a look at the complete sentence and not only the underlined portion .

increase would make further rate increase unnecessary.

Increase here refers to the rates increased by postal services in 1985 .

Because of this increase in rates in 1985 no further increase would be required . This is what the sentence actually means.

Hope this helps.
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 613
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 6:17 am
Location: madrid
Thanked: 171 times
Followed by:64 members
GMAT Score:790

by kevincanspain » Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:46 am
I think the word increase needs an s in choice D
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 537
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:15 am
Location: Nagpur , India
Thanked: 41 times
Followed by:1 members

by rockeyb » Fri Mar 26, 2010 4:24 am
kevincanspain wrote:I think the word increase needs an s in choice D
I dont get it . Why should increase in D need a S ?
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 613
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 6:17 am
Location: madrid
Thanked: 171 times
Followed by:64 members
GMAT Score:790

by kevincanspain » Fri Mar 26, 2010 6:24 am
make a further rate increase unnecessary

OR

make further rate increases unnecessary
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 106
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 8:04 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by sanyalpritish » Fri Mar 26, 2010 7:32 am
Amazing observation

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 537
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:15 am
Location: Nagpur , India
Thanked: 41 times
Followed by:1 members

by rockeyb » Fri Mar 26, 2010 8:15 am
kevincanspain wrote:make a further rate increase unnecessary

OR

make further rate increases unnecessary

WOW !!!! man - O - man that is simply amazing .

Hats off to you for that observation .

Phew no words ............... :shock:
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"