Please delete this post anyway if discussion on the problem already exists.
When rates were raised in 1985, postal service officials predicted they would make further rate increases unnecessary for at least three years.
(A) they would make further rate increases unnecessary
(B) they would mean that further rate increases would not be needed
(C) that it would not be necessary for further rate increases
(D) that the increase would make further rate increase unnecessary
(E) further rate increases will not be needed
OA is D
Could anyone tell me if the "that" is omittable in the clause? Thanks~
SC problem: When rates were raised in 1985
This topic has expert replies
- rockeyb
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:15 am
- Location: Nagpur , India
- Thanked: 41 times
- Followed by:1 members
Although this has been posted earlier , I did not find the explanation good enough . So here it goes .
The sentence is checking verb tense and mood .
Mood here is subjunctive .
PREDICTED = subjunctive and as per rule SUBJUNCTIVE + THAT + Bare form of verb TO BE .
But there are some subjunctives that need infinitive OR THAT or both .
Ex : The commissioner ALLOWED the members TO BE in the room .
So since THAT is needed we can eliminate A, B and E straight away .
Between (C) and (D) .
In (C) IT has no antecedent .
The only correct answer is D.
The sentence is checking verb tense and mood .
Mood here is subjunctive .
PREDICTED = subjunctive and as per rule SUBJUNCTIVE + THAT + Bare form of verb TO BE .
So if you see the above rule . THAT can not be omitted .Could anyone tell me if the "that" is omittable in the clause?
But there are some subjunctives that need infinitive OR THAT or both .
Ex : The commissioner ALLOWED the members TO BE in the room .
So since THAT is needed we can eliminate A, B and E straight away .
Between (C) and (D) .
In (C) IT has no antecedent .
The only correct answer is D.
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"
- fx678
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 2:47 pm
- Location: Shanghai
- Thanked: 2 times
- GMAT Score:550
Thank you very much for your reply, rockeyb. My classmate said that it should be an objective clause, but I was not sure if it checks the subjunctive mood.
No pain, no gain.
- rockeyb
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:15 am
- Location: Nagpur , India
- Thanked: 41 times
- Followed by:1 members
Well it certainly dose check for subjunctive .fx678 wrote:Thank you very much for your reply, rockeyb. My classmate said that it should be an objective clause, but I was not sure if it checks the subjunctive mood.
Check MGMAT SC book for better understanding .
Cheers !!!
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/smile.png)
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"
- sanyalpritish
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 8:04 pm
- Thanked: 2 times
Well I was stuck between C and D, I agree It does not have a antecedent, but the meaning in D is not clear it says the " "increase would make further rate increase unnecessary " how can increase make anything.
If any one clarify this it will be great.
Can you please state the source of this question
If any one clarify this it will be great.
Can you please state the source of this question
- rockeyb
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:15 am
- Location: Nagpur , India
- Thanked: 41 times
- Followed by:1 members
Have a look at the complete sentence and not only the underlined portion .sanyalpritish wrote:Well I was stuck between C and D, I agree It does not have a antecedent, but the meaning in D is not clear it says the " "increase would make further rate increase unnecessary " how can increase make anything.
If any one clarify this it will be great.
Can you please state the source of this question
increase would make further rate increase unnecessary.
Increase here refers to the rates increased by postal services in 1985 .
Because of this increase in rates in 1985 no further increase would be required . This is what the sentence actually means.
Hope this helps.
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"
- kevincanspain
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 613
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 6:17 am
- Location: madrid
- Thanked: 171 times
- Followed by:64 members
- GMAT Score:790
I think the word increase needs an s in choice D
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid
- kevincanspain
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 613
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 6:17 am
- Location: madrid
- Thanked: 171 times
- Followed by:64 members
- GMAT Score:790
make a further rate increase unnecessary
OR
make further rate increases unnecessary
OR
make further rate increases unnecessary
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid
- sanyalpritish
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 8:04 pm
- Thanked: 2 times
- rockeyb
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:15 am
- Location: Nagpur , India
- Thanked: 41 times
- Followed by:1 members
kevincanspain wrote:make a further rate increase unnecessary
OR
make further rate increases unnecessary
WOW !!!! man - O - man that is simply amazing .
Hats off to you for that observation .
Phew no words ...............
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/shocked.png)
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"