Gmat RC question..Explanation required!!!!!!!

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 2:50 am
Thanked: 2 times
1 Before plans can be finalized for a
space station that maintains a low-earth
orbit, scientists must first answer
questions about the durability of
5 materials involved in its construction,
allowing them to determine which
sections of the space station will need
the greatest protection and to ensure
that such a craft is not overprotected
10 and consequently too heavy. In 1984
NASA deployed a satellite called the
Long-Duration Exposure Facility
(LDEF). Each of LDEF's experimental
specimens-materials intended for use
15 in the construction of spacecraft-was
mounted on the LDEF surface. LDEF
was balanced to maintain a constant
near-vertical orientation, leaning slightly
forward, so that the satellite did not spin
20 while it orbited the earth. This feature
allowed scientists to measure damage
caused to "leading" and "trailing" parts of
a spacecraft and to what extent the
damage suffered was affected by the
25 craft's orientation.
Initial reports indicate that LDEF could
yield much invaluable information. LDEF
data have already revealed the damage
atomic oxygen causes and confirmed
30 that its effects are much more
pronounced on leading than on trailing
surfaces. Atomic oxygen, comprising
most of the low-earth orbit atmosphere,
is much less stable than molecular
35 oxygen. It has no thermal velocity, and
as a result, it is effectively motionless.
Scientists now know that a fast-moving
object in space sweeps up oxygen
atoms as it travels (eventually
40 abandoning them in its wake) and they
understand to what degree an object's
orientation affects the damage caused
by atomic oxygen. The data promise to
yield other useful insights.

It can be inferred from the passage that the rotation of an object orbiting the earth
A)can be neutralized in the design process
B)will cause the object to maintain a near vertical orientation
C)is determined by the weight of the object itself
D)is caused by a combination of space-borne elements and atmospheric pressure
E)cannot be maintained indefinitely without the imposition of an outside force such as atmospheric oxygen
Source: — Reading Comprehension |

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 439
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 8:32 am
Location: India
Thanked: 34 times
Followed by:28 members

by sivaelectric » Sat Jun 04, 2011 6:59 am
I guess A is the answer. I inferred from these lines
LDEF was balanced to maintain a constant near-vertical orientation, leaning slightly forward, so that the satellite did not spin 20 while it orbited the earth.
:)
If I am wrong correct me :), If my post helped let me know by clicking the Thanks button ;).

Chitra Sivasankar Arunagiri

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 5:34 am
Location: India
Thanked: 310 times
Followed by:123 members
GMAT Score:750

by cans » Sat Jun 04, 2011 8:34 am
IMO A
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button ;)

Contact me about long distance tutoring!
[email protected]

Cans!!

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 439
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 8:32 am
Location: India
Thanked: 34 times
Followed by:28 members

by sivaelectric » Sat Jun 04, 2011 8:36 am
Hey CANS did you infer from the same lines or do you have some other lines of inference. :)
If I am wrong correct me :), If my post helped let me know by clicking the Thanks button ;).

Chitra Sivasankar Arunagiri

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 5:34 am
Location: India
Thanked: 310 times
Followed by:123 members
GMAT Score:750

by cans » Sat Jun 04, 2011 9:59 am
d and e) irrelevant (didn't found atmospheric pressure in the passage)
c) weight is measured but only to make sure that its not too heavy
LDEF
was balanced to maintain a constant
near-vertical orientation, leaning slightly
forward, so that the satellite did not spin while it orbited the earth.
b) Ldef had near-vertical orientation but not because of rotation of an object but because of the way it was balanced.
a) ldef was leaned slightly forward so that satellite didn't spin. Thus rotation can be neutralized.
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button ;)

Contact me about long distance tutoring!
[email protected]

Cans!!

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 126
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 6:37 pm
Followed by:4 members

by sandeep800 » Sat Jun 04, 2011 8:54 pm
IMO also A
A body of clay, a mind full of play, a moment's life - that is me!!!

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 126
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 6:37 pm
Followed by:4 members

by sandeep800 » Sat Jun 04, 2011 8:55 pm
IMO also A
A body of clay, a mind full of play, a moment's life - that is me!!!

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 142
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 8:03 am
Thanked: 19 times

by krishnasty » Sat Jun 04, 2011 10:11 pm
IMO A.

Relatively straight forward answer. Even in the case when you are not able to decide the right option, it can be found out by the process of elimination :

It can be inferred from the passage that the rotation of an object orbiting the earth
A)can be neutralized in the design process - Seems ok...lets check the other option
B)will cause the object to maintain a near vertical orientation - it's the opposite.so, wrong.
C)is determined by the weight of the object itself - not very clearly stated in the paragraph
D)is caused by a combination of space-borne elements and atmospheric pressure - irrelevant
E)cannot be maintained indefinitely without the imposition of an outside force such as atmospheric oxygen - irrelevant

Hence, the answer is clear A.

I hope it's much clear now.

Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Sat Jun 04, 2011 10:35 pm
its gmat prep or OG ?
I Seek Explanations Not Answers

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 2:50 am
Thanked: 2 times

by abidshariff » Fri Jun 10, 2011 6:26 am
princeton review mate!!