BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Manned space programs

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Legendary Member
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
Thanked: 36 times
Followed by:2 members

Manned space programs

by goelmohit2002 » Fri Mar 13, 2009 12:29 am
Hi All,

In the below question, the correct answer is "E". Can somebody please help me understand what is wrong with "A" and "D" ?

In the early days of the manned space programs, three astronauts died in a fire before engineers discovered that a mixture of oxygen and nitrogen, rather than pure oxygen, will be breathable and less incendiary.

a) will be breathable and less incendiary.
b) breathes better than it burns.
c) was less incendiary than breathable.
d) to be breathable rather than incendiary.
e) would be breathable and less incendiary.

Thanks
Mohit
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 107
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:39 am
Location: Vancouver
Thanked: 9 times
GMAT Score:750

by pakaskwa » Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:13 am
... engineers discovered that a mixture of oxygen and nitrogen, rather than pure oxygen, will be breathable and less incendiary.

a) will be breathable and less incendiary.
in original sentence, engineers discovered indicates that it's past tense. So using will be is incorrect.


d) to be breathable rather than incendiary.
It changed the original meaning. It indicates that mixture of oxygen and nitrogen is breathable, but not incendary, which is not true.
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
Thanked: 36 times
Followed by:2 members

by goelmohit2002 » Fri Mar 13, 2009 7:21 am
pakaskwa wrote:... engineers discovered that a mixture of oxygen and nitrogen, rather than pure oxygen, will be breathable and less incendiary.

a) will be breathable and less incendiary.
in original sentence, engineers discovered indicates that it's past tense. So using will be is incorrect.


d) to be breathable rather than incendiary.
It changed the original meaning. It indicates that mixture of oxygen and nitrogen is breathable, but not incendary, which is not true.
Thanks. I got for "D"..but for "A"...the same logic IMO applies for "would" too....both "will" and "would" indicate future tense....

Please tell what I am missing here. As per my understanding...

Will = future almost guaranteed event.
Would = future event but not sure of its outcome.

Thanks
Mohit
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 188
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:40 am
Location: INDIA
Thanked: 4 times

by senthil » Sat Mar 14, 2009 10:45 am
As per Wrenin Martin ,

would,could,might all are past tense ...

may be one of their forms may take the meaning as what u say but really not heard of what you 've mantioned above...
Thanks
Senthil

It seems impossible until its done.
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
Thanked: 36 times
Followed by:2 members

by goelmohit2002 » Sat Mar 14, 2009 11:00 am
I am not sure about Wrenin and Martin. But IMO OG-10 follows will Vs would distinction. Q250 of OG-10 has similar will Vs would distinction.

Please tell if I am missing something here.

Thanks
Mohit
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 174
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:04 am
Thanked: 5 times
GMAT Score:620

by bmlaud » Sat Mar 14, 2009 11:42 am
If Principal clause is simple past, the subordinate clause can only take simple past or past perfect.

Principle clause: Three astronauts died...(simple past)
Subordinate clause: that a mixture of oxygen and ..... would be ( past of will be)....

Thus E
"Great works are performed not by strength but by perseverance."
Top
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1