BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

Fianancial benefit

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 435
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 3:55 am
Thanked: 17 times

Re: Fianancial benefit

by madhur_ahuja » Tue Jul 28, 2009 9:11 am
crackgmat007 wrote:OA to follow. Pls explain your answers. Tx
IMO D.

share of market remaining constant is assumption.

D attacks this.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 121
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 1:16 am
Thanked: 4 times
GMAT Score:720

by Naruto » Tue Jul 28, 2009 9:43 am
IMO C

Because if C is true then the comparison and the factors considered are rendered moot.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 221
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 10:33 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 12 times

by krisraam » Tue Jul 28, 2009 10:41 am
IMO D.



Thanks
Raama
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 527
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 9:14 am
Location: Atlanta
Thanked: 17 times

by pandeyvineet24 » Tue Jul 28, 2009 5:29 pm
Yes D for me to.

Argument assumes that market share would remain constant. D clearly states that the new process would reduce the cost and increase the maeket share.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:11 pm
Location: NYC
Thanked: 1 times
GMAT Score:720

by n_niaz » Sun Aug 02, 2009 11:27 am
IMO E
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 11:37 am
Location: kolkata

by ssbhowmick » Mon Aug 03, 2009 5:50 pm
I think it is C..

If you compare the net gains in investing with that of not investing, then this will prove to be a disadvantage as intial investments might not yield any net gains in the beginning but later might yield enough benefit..
Peace
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 57
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 3:07 am

by micheal_kr » Sun May 15, 2016 11:33 pm
I am leaning more towards C
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1