BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

knewton DS

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1077
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 1:44 am
Thanked: 118 times
Followed by:33 members
GMAT Score:710

knewton DS

by bblast » Tue Aug 30, 2011 4:20 am
An item's sale price was x percent of its original price by the end of the first week of the sale. By the end of the second week, the sale price was further reduced to y percent of its original price.

What was the original price of the item?

x = 20
y - x = 15

E
Cheers !!

Quant 47-Striving for 50
Verbal 34-Striving for 40

My gmat journey :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/710-bblast-s ... 90735.html
My take on the GMAT RC :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ways-to-bbla ... 90808.html
How to prepare before your MBA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upz46D7 ... TWBZF14TKW_
Top
Source: — Data Sufficiency |
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 324
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 6:44 am
Location: London
Thanked: 70 times
Followed by:3 members

by kmittal82 » Tue Aug 30, 2011 4:27 am
Let original price = a

End of first week, items price = (x/100) * a
End of second week, items price = (y/100) * a

(1) Clearly Not sufficient

(2) Again, not sufficient as we have 3 unknowns

Combine (1) and (2)

y = 35, which again does not give the value of a itself.
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 608
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 11:16 am
Thanked: 37 times
Followed by:8 members

by saketk » Tue Aug 30, 2011 11:48 am
bblast wrote:An item's sale price was x percent of its original price by the end of the first week of the sale. By the end of the second week, the sale price was further reduced to y percent of its original price.

What was the original price of the item?

x = 20
y - x = 15

E
Hi, Although the answer is E. I think the second statement is incorrect.
After reading the question statement can't we say that the value of Y is less than X?

In the 2nd week the price was further reduced to Y% of the actual price (P) . Say, X=20%
Sale price in 1st week= 0.2p
Sale price in the 2nd week has to be less that the 1st week price.
Hence value of Y should be less than X. Or, Am I missing something.. is it something like this for the 2nd week -- y% of X% of P.

Just a thought
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 398
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 11:39 pm
Location: India
Thanked: 41 times
Followed by:6 members

by prateek_guy2004 » Tue Aug 30, 2011 2:20 pm
I did a similar problem in prob solving.....In this yes statement 1 and 2 are not sufficient to get the original value..

Thought the discounted percentage can be concluded.....

IMOE
Don't look for the incorrect things that you have done rather look for remedies....

https://www.beatthegmat.com/motivation-t90253.html
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1077
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 1:44 am
Thanked: 118 times
Followed by:33 members
GMAT Score:710

by bblast » Tue Aug 30, 2011 9:22 pm
saketk wrote:
bblast wrote:An item's sale price was x percent of its original price by the end of the first week of the sale. By the end of the second week, the sale price was further reduced to y percent of its original price.

What was the original price of the item?

x = 20
y - x = 15

E
Hi, Although the answer is E. I think the second statement is incorrect.
After reading the question statement can't we say that the value of Y is less than X?

In the 2nd week the price was further reduced to Y% of the actual price (P) . Say, X=20%
Sale price in 1st week= 0.2p
Sale price in the 2nd week has to be less that the 1st week price.
Hence value of Y should be less than X. Or, Am I missing something.. is it something like this for the 2nd week -- y% of X% of P.

Just a thought

This is exactly why I posted this question. But I am sure we are missing something.
Cheers !!

Quant 47-Striving for 50
Verbal 34-Striving for 40

My gmat journey :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/710-bblast-s ... 90735.html
My take on the GMAT RC :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ways-to-bbla ... 90808.html
How to prepare before your MBA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upz46D7 ... TWBZF14TKW_
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 540
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 7:24 pm
Thanked: 37 times
Followed by:6 members

by navami » Tue Aug 30, 2011 10:52 pm
Got to be E.


no information provided on the real price. We can just come out with % value. not the real value.
This time no looking back!!!
Navami
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 106
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 9:39 am
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:1 members

by czarczar » Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:06 pm
Though answer should be E but a bad question stem.
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 582
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:48 am
Thanked: 61 times
Followed by:6 members
GMAT Score:740

by force5 » Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:28 pm
+1 for E.
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 608
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 11:16 am
Thanked: 37 times
Followed by:8 members

by saketk » Sat Sep 03, 2011 11:50 am
bblast wrote:
saketk wrote:
bblast wrote:An item's sale price was x percent of its original price by the end of the first week of the sale. By the end of the second week, the sale price was further reduced to y percent of its original price.

What was the original price of the item?

x = 20
y - x = 15

E
Hi, Although the answer is E. I think the second statement is incorrect.
After reading the question statement can't we say that the value of Y is less than X?

In the 2nd week the price was further reduced to Y% of the actual price (P) . Say, X=20%
Sale price in 1st week= 0.2p
Sale price in the 2nd week has to be less that the 1st week price.
Hence value of Y should be less than X. Or, Am I missing something.. is it something like this for the 2nd week -- y% of X% of P.

Just a thought

This is exactly why I posted this question. But I am sure we are missing something.
Don't know but lets move on :) .. this is a bad question stem ..lol
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1