BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

og math # 130

Expert replies

by davidoff78 » Thu Apr 05, 2012 12:04 pm
The right answer id D 22/15
Join the discussion

by vermarohitbr » Fri May 18, 2012 6:12 am
Work "A" -- Time taken by y&z working together -- A[(1/15)+(1/18)]=1 --> A = 90/11
Same work "A", completed by x in 12 hrs
So ratio = 12/(90/11)=22/15

Ans D
Join the discussion

by asax » Fri Jun 15, 2012 7:11 pm
Join the discussion

by Chinmoy » Tue Jun 26, 2012 3:16 am
Thanks Stuart. Understood why the fraction is flipped. The right answer is 22/15. Cheers!!!
Join the discussion

by Umang_Mathur » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:22 pm
There's a much better and easier way to solve this problem, which would hardly use pen and paper. Here it goes:

Instead of assuming the total word done as 1, which leads us to fractions and then calculations, lets assume the total work to be the LCM of the individual times taken by X, Y & Z.
The LCM would be 180.

Now, the work done by X = 15
the work done by Y = 12
the work done by Z = 10

Thus the ratio of work done by X to that done by Y & Z = 15 : (10 + 12) i.e 15:22
Therefore the ratio of time taken will be 22 : 15

Hope it helps... :-)

Cheers!!!
Umang
Join the discussion

by cuddytime » Thu Jul 12, 2012 8:21 am
if you got this wrong, here's where i tripped up:

1/12T=W
11/90T=W

so we need to find the TIME:
T=12W
T=90/11W

then solve:
12W/(90/11W)
= (12*11)W / 90
= 22/15 W

plug in 1 for W (since it is 1 job)
Join the discussion

by Shubhu@MBA » Sat Jul 14, 2012 2:47 pm
Y & z can do the job in 1/15. + 1/18=11/90
Thus they can do the job in 90/11 hrs
Thus the ratio is
12/90/11= 22/15
Thus the answer is D
Join the discussion

by icespray89 » Tue Jul 31, 2012 7:10 pm
Well no need for such huge calculations. this can be explained very easily !
the above fact means : machine 1 can finish it in 12 hrs.
Machine 2 in 15 and machine 3 in 18 hrs.
So machine 2 and 3 will, combined, take 1/(1/15+1/18) . U first calculate the rate per hour done by both and then invert it so that you whats the total time taken. ---> 33/270.

So the ratio is 12*33 / 270 which gives the desired answer!
Join the discussion

by rajshas » Wed Aug 01, 2012 5:43 am
OA is 15/22

ie rate of x divided by combined rate of y and z taken individually.

ie (1/12)/(1/15+1/18).
Join the discussion

by rajshas » Wed Aug 01, 2012 5:47 am
Oops i got that wrong ... its for time... :P OA 22/15 , thanx everyone
Join the discussion

by damilolaamele » Tue Aug 14, 2012 2:53 am
Answer is D

x = 12hrs, y = 15 hrs, z = 18hrs
y and z combined will do 1/15 + 1/18 in one hour which equals 11/90.

x alone will do the 1/12 of the job in an hour.

x:y and z = 1/12 : 11/90 = 15/22. this is the ratio of work done in an hour.

The inverse of 15/22 which is equal to 22/15 gives us the ratio of time it takes printer x to do the job, working alone to time it takes printers y and z to do the job working together.
Join the discussion

by sureshcpa » Fri Aug 24, 2012 8:07 am
In 1 hour combined work of y + Z = 1/15 + 1/18 = 11/90
Total time of y + z = 90/11 (reverse the 1 hour number to get the total time)

Ratio of X:y+z = 12:90/11 = (12 x 11)/90 = 2 x 11/15 = 22/15

Ans: D
Join the discussion

by eski » Fri Sep 07, 2012 1:01 am
For those who not having a clarity on the approach . Simple way

Rate of work = work / time
we need to find : x / combined time of y and z

combined time of y and z :

we know individual time , suppose both do a common amount of work w . then

rate of doing w y = w/time to do w = w/(1*y) = w/y

Rate of doing w by z = w/z

Combined rate = w(1/y+1/z)

again rate = w / time , so combined time = w / combined rate = w/w(1/y+1/z)

ie 12/(1/((1/15)+(1/18))

= 12/(1/(33/(15*18)) = 22/15
Join the discussion

by marlinemilio » Tue Sep 11, 2012 10:59 am
HOW DID YOU GET THE THE 6, 5 AND 90
camitava wrote:Enginpasa1,
Look if y and z work together, they can do = (1/15 + 1/18) amount in 1 day = (6 + 5) / 90 = 11/90.
so y and z can complete the work in 90/11 days.

On the other hand, x can do the work in 12 day.
So ratio is = 12 : 90/11 = 22/15.

Look the Qs is asking for - What is the ratio of the time it takes printer x to do the job, working at its rate, to time it takes printers y and z to do the job, working together at their individual rates? So you can not do the ratio with the amount of work, u got, that x and (y + z) can do in 1 hr.

1/12 -> Amount of work done by X in 1 hr
11/90 -> Amount of work done by Y and Z in 1 hr . So u can not do the ratio of these numbers. Got me, Enginpasa1?
Join the discussion

by way2ashish » Mon Sep 17, 2012 7:46 am
The answer is D
;15
12 : (18*15/33) = 22:15
Join the discussion