A line with the equation y = px + q is reflected over the line y = x. Is the reflection of this line parallel to the line y = mx + n?
(1) m = p + 2
(2) m = 3p
(1) m = p + 2
(2) m = 3p
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
RedeemTarget Test Prep · GMAT
Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

with Chris Peckover

with Logan Thompson
Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.
Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.
Absco wrote:A line with the equation y = px + q is reflected over the line y = x. Is the reflection of this line parallel to the line y = mx + n?
(1) m = p + 2
(2) m = 3p

Anurag@Gurome wrote:Absco wrote:A line with the equation y = px + q is reflected over the line y = x. Is the reflection of this line parallel to the line y = mx + n?
(1) m = p + 2
(2) m = 3p
Slope of line y = px + q is p and slope of line y = mx + n is m.
(1) m = p + 2 implies there is just one equation and 2 variables. Until we know the values of m and p, we cannot say whether reflection of y = px + q is parallel to the line y = mx + n. So, (1) is NOT SUFFICIENT.
(2) m = 3p again implies there is just one equation and 2 variables. Until we know the values of m and p, we cannot say whether reflection of y = px + q is parallel to the line y = mx + n. So, (2) is NOT SUFFICIENT.
Combining (1) and (2), 3p = p + 2 implies p = 1 and m = 3. So, now we can find the angle that each of the two lines make with x -axis. Hence, combining the statements is SUFFICIENT to answer the question.
The correct answer is C.
You are assuming here that the two lines with slopes m and p must be perpendicular in order to be parallel after reflecting one of the lines about the line y=x. I'm not sure if this assumption is valid.aneesh.kg wrote:Let's try to find the slope of the reflected line.
Thus, Slope of the line = [((q/1 - p) - q)/ (q/1 - p) - (0))] = 1/p
So, in order to find if this line is parallel to y = mx + c or not, we need to see if 1/p = m or not. Or, Is mp = 1 ?
Hello Anurag - I did not understand the question or the solution - What does the term "reflection mean" ? I was assuming that the line y=x is actually perpendicular to y=px+q therefore slope of y=x; M" = 1 and slope of y=px+q; p= -1 ?? And thus question is asking if this line y=px+q is parallel to line y=mx+n; i.e. m= -1 ?Anurag@Gurome wrote:Absco wrote:A line with the equation y = px + q is reflected over the line y = x. Is the reflection of this line parallel to the line y = mx + n?
(1) m = p + 2
(2) m = 3p
Slope of line y = px + q is p and slope of line y = mx + n is m.
(1) m = p + 2 implies there is just one equation and 2 variables. Until we know the values of m and p, we cannot say whether reflection of y = px + q is parallel to the line y = mx + n. So, (1) is NOT SUFFICIENT.
(2) m = 3p again implies there is just one equation and 2 variables. Until we know the values of m and p, we cannot say whether reflection of y = px + q is parallel to the line y = mx + n. So, (2) is NOT SUFFICIENT.
Combining (1) and (2), 3p = p + 2 implies p = 1 and m = 3. So, now we can find the angle that each of the two lines make with x -axis. Hence, combining the statements is SUFFICIENT to answer the question.
The correct answer is C.
In coordinate geometry, reflection over or with respect to a line means as if there is a invisible mirror placed on the line. For example, in the following figure P' is the reflection of P with respect to the line l, meaning as if there is an invisible mirror along the line l on which P' is the reflection of P.subhakam wrote:Hello Anurag - I did not understand the question or the solution - What does the term "reflection mean" ?
...
I totally misunderstood the question. Appreciate if you could explain it to me


New here Create free account