Thailand's GDP

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 301
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 6:07 am
Thanked: 2 times

Thailand's GDP

by beater » Fri Oct 10, 2008 7:43 pm
Many researchers regard Thailand’s
recent economic growth, as reflected by its
gross domestic product (GDP) growth rates,
Line as an example of the success of a modern
(5) technological development strategy based
on the market economics of industrialized
countries. Yet by focusing solely on aggre-
gate economic growth data as the measure
of Thailand’s development, these research-
(10) ers have overlooked the economic impact of
rural development projects that improve
people’s daily lives at the village level—
such as the cooperative raising of water
buffalo, improved sanitation, and the devel-
(15) opment of food crops both for consumption
and for sale at local markets; such projects
are not adequately reflected in the country’s
GDP. These researchers, influenced by
Robert Heilbroner’s now outdated develop-
(20) ment theory, tend to view nontechnological
development as an obstacle to progress.
Heilbroner’s theory has become doctrine in
some economics textbooks: for example,
Monte Palmer disparages nontechnological
(25) rural development projects as inhibiting
constructive change. Yet as Ann Kelleher’s
two recent case studies of the Thai villages
Non Muang and Dong Keng illustrate, the
nontechnological-versus-technological
(30) dichotomy can lead researchers not only to
overlook real advances achieved by rural
development projects but also mistakenly to
conclude that because such advances are
initiated by rural leaders and are based on
(35) traditional values and practices, they retard
“real” economic development.


The author of the passage cites the work of Palmer in order to give an example of

A. a recent case study of rural development projects in Thai villages
B. current research that has attempted to reassess Thailand’s economic development
C. an economics textbook that views nontechnological development as an obstacle to progress
D. the prevalence of the view that regards nontechnological development as beneficial but inefficient
E. a portrayal of nontechnological development projects as promoting constructive change

Please explain your answer
Source: — Reading Comprehension |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 344
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 11:00 am
Location: USA
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:1 members

Re: Thailand's GDP

by Bidisha800 » Sun Oct 12, 2008 10:47 am
(C)

Palmer follows Heilbroner’s theory in his book and concur that nontechnological development as an obstacle to progress

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 301
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 6:07 am
Thanked: 2 times

by beater » Tue Oct 14, 2008 3:19 pm
Well, I think C is the best answer but not 100% correct. There is no example of a text book given per se.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 344
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 11:00 am
Location: USA
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:1 members

by Bidisha800 » Tue Oct 14, 2008 11:15 pm
You don't have OA ?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 301
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 6:07 am
Thanked: 2 times

by beater » Wed Oct 15, 2008 5:11 am
Yes, I do. OA - C. Thanks!

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 1:59 am
Location: Shanghai
GMAT Score:710

by ynjynj » Tue Dec 02, 2008 4:49 pm
what about the first question?
the primary prupose of the passage is to:
A.explain the true reasons for the increase in the Thaildand's GDP
B. argue for the adoption of certain rural development projects
C.question the value of technological development in Thailand
D.criticize certain assumptions about economic development in Thailland
E.comare traditional and modern development strategies in Thalilland

Why is D?, where can we infer the"assumption" from the passage

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 145
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 8:41 am
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:2 members

by anshulseth » Tue Apr 14, 2009 12:31 am
The "assupmtion" is by some researchers who consider Thailand's economic growth solely on technological advancement and not on non-technological rural development.

Look at this line:
Yet by focusing solely on aggre-
gate economic growth data as the measure
of Thailand’s development, these research-
ers have overlooked the economic impact of
rural development projects that improve
people’s daily lives at the village level
Hence D.
Asset

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 152
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 4:36 pm
Thanked: 8 times
Followed by:2 members

by artistocrat » Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:29 pm
"textbooks: for example"...

:-)