BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG 182

Expert replies
by nkaur » Fri Apr 22, 2011 7:03 am
Hi Guys,

If the two-digit integers M and N are positive and have the same digits, but in reverse order, which of the following CANNOT be the sum of M and N?

(A) 181
(B) 165
(C) 121
(D) 99
(E) 44

I dont understand why the solution given is right, because they choose to take (10t+u)+(10u+t) and then get 11t+11u=11(t+u) and therefore reason that is has to be that 181 is no multiple of 11.

However if i take (11+u)+(11u+t) I get another solution. Where does it say that one has to say and if i take any other two-digit integer, will I get the same solution? Can somebody explain this please?
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Fri Apr 22, 2011 7:16 am
nkaur wrote:Hi Guys,

If the two-digit integers M and N are positive and have the same digits, but in reverse order, which of the following CANNOT be the sum of M and N?

(A) 181
(B) 165
(C) 121
(D) 99
(E) 44

I dont understand why the solution given is right, because they choose to take (10t+u)+(10u+t) and then get 11t+11u=11(t+u) and therefore reason that is has to be that 181 is no multiple of 11.

However if i take (11+u)+(11u+t) I get another solution. Where does it say that one has to say and if i take any other two-digit integer, will I get the same solution? Can somebody explain this please?
This question relies on our ability to determine the value of any 2-digit number.
For example, what is the value of 83? For most of us, it has been a very long time since we examined this (we learned this when we we 5 or 6). Most of us just say that 83 has a value of 83, but 83 is really just a "recipe" for some value.
83 is equal to 8 tens plus 3 ones.
Similarly, 76 is equal to 7 tens plus 6 ones.

In general, if tu represents a 2-digit number (the t stands for the digit in the tens position and the u stands for the digit in the units position), then the value of tu is 10t + u

This is where we got the "10t + u" part in the original solution.

So, if M = tu, then N = ut
The value of M is 10t + u and the value of N us 10u + t
This means the value of M+N is (10t + u) + (10u + t) = 11t + 11u = 11(t + u)

So, we can see that M+N must be a multiple of 11
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by Anurag@Gurome » Fri Apr 22, 2011 7:18 am
nkaur wrote:Hi Guys,

If the two-digit integers M and N are positive and have the same digits, but in reverse order, which of the following CANNOT be the sum of M and N?

(A) 181
(B) 165
(C) 121
(D) 99
(E) 44

I dont understand why the solution given is right, because they choose to take (10t+u)+(10u+t) and then get 11t+11u=11(t+u) and therefore reason that is has to be that 181 is no multiple of 11.

However if i take (11+u)+(11u+t) I get another solution. Where does it say that one has to say and if i take any other two-digit integer, will I get the same solution? Can somebody explain this please?
Here the 2-digit integer is tu, which can be written as M = tu = 10*t + u (Take an example: 39 = 3*10 + 9)
So, the other 2-digit integer with the same digits means we have to interchange the digits, and the reversed 2-digit integer is N = ut = 10*u + t (Continuing the above example, reverse digit of 39 is 93).
So, M + N = (10*t + u) + (10*u + t) = 11t + 11u = 11(t + u), which means that the sum should be a multiple of 11.
Of the given choices, only 181 is not a multiple of 11.

The correct answer is A.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion

by manpsingh87 » Fri Apr 22, 2011 7:19 am
nkaur wrote:Hi Guys,

If the two-digit integers M and N are positive and have the same digits, but in reverse order, which of the following CANNOT be the sum of M and N?

(A) 181
(B) 165
(C) 121
(D) 99
(E) 44

I dont understand why the solution given is right, because they choose to take (10t+u)+(10u+t) and then get 11t+11u=11(t+u) and therefore reason that is has to be that 181 is no multiple of 11.

However if i take (11+u)+(11u+t) I get another solution. Where does it say that one has to say and if i take any other two-digit integer, will I get the same solution? Can somebody explain this please?
any two digit number can be represented in the form of 10t+u ; where t and u can be any number from 1 to 9; for example consider 13; this can be written as 10+3; here t is 1 and u is 3, also consider 99; 10*9+9; here t is 9 and u is 9;

i hope that clears your doubt that why its written as 10t+u and not as 11u+t;
O Excellence... my search for you is on... you can be far.. but not beyond my reach!
Join the discussion