BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Did the person in second place receive at least $40?

Expert replies
by gmattesttaker2 » Sun Jun 15, 2014 6:11 pm
Hello,

Can you please tell me how to solve for Statement 2 here:


$150 in prize money is going to be split among 6 contestants in a competition at a charity event. The person in first place receives the most money, the person in second place receives the second most, the person in third place receives the third most, and so on. Did the person in second place receive at least $40 of the prize money?

(1) The person in first place won $50

(2) No individual prize was within $10 of another prize


OA: B


The OA mentions:

If no individual prize was within $10 of another prize then the only possibility is 0,10,20,30,40,and 50 and statement (2) is sufficient by itself.

This is from Veritas test.


Thanks a lot,
Sri
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by kvcpk » Sun Jun 15, 2014 6:27 pm
gmattesttaker2 wrote:Hello,

Can you please tell me how to solve for Statement 2 here:


$150 in prize money is going to be split among 6 contestants in a competition at a charity event. The person in first place receives the most money, the person in second place receives the second most, the person in third place receives the third most, and so on. Did the person in second place receive at least $40 of the prize money?

(1) The person in first place won $50

(2) No individual prize was within $10 of another prize


OA: B


The OA mentions:

If no individual prize was within $10 of another prize then the only possibility is 0,10,20,30,40,and 50 and statement (2) is sufficient by itself.

This is from Veritas test.


Thanks a lot,
Sri
Total amount = 150
(1) The person in first place won $50
Sum of all other prizes = 100.
Statement 1 doesnt give us any hint about the second place prize amount.
INSUFFICIENT


(2) No individual prize was within $10 of another prize
Lets say the least prize amount was x,
then, x+x+10+x+20+x+30+x+40+x+50 = 150. (This is the closest possible)
6X +150 = 150
X=0
Hence 2nd spot received atleast 0+40 = 40 dollars.
SUFFICIENT

pick B

Hope this helps!!
"Once you start working on something,
don't be afraid of failure and don't abandon it.
People who work sincerely are the happiest."
Chanakya quotes (Indian politician, strategist and writer, 350 BC-275BC)
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Sun Jun 15, 2014 6:30 pm
Hi Sri,

This is a poorly worded question. I understand the "intent" of it, but the writer wasn't precise enough in his/her use of language.

To start, the prompt implies that all six contestants receive prize money. The explanation for Statement 2 states that the 6th place contestant receives $0, which isn't a prize. Second, Statement 2 states that "no prize...was WITHIN $10 of another prize." The word "within" is problematic because it's left to the Test Taker to determine if that means "less than, but not including, $10" or if it means "$10 or less, inclusive."

GMAT questions are carefully worded, vetted and tested before they are ever used as "live" questions on an actual GMAT; this process removes almost all "bias" in terms of how a Test Taker might interpret the prompt. This question probably did not go through as rigorous of a vetting process.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion