-
rohitacmilan
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 6:30 pm
- Followed by:1 members
The proposal requiring mutual fund companies to set aside a part of their fee for investor education is laudable, but meaningless. The challenge actually lies in finding the right ways of educating investors and making them financially literate.
Which of the following, if true most strongly supports the argument?
(A) People looking to invest in mutual funds currently lack the knowledge to make informed decisions.
(B) Most mutual funds have accumulated large reserves of cash for investor education.
(C) Investing in mutual funds is very different from investing in other financial instruments such as shares and debentures.
(D) Financially literate customers, on the whole, provide more business to mutual fund companies than do financially ignorant ones.
(E) Activities aimed at educating customers cost a lot of money and most mutual funds do not have the cash reserves to conduct such activities.
Original Answer: Option B
Please explain how I should approach this question.
Source: Aristotle Prep CR Grail (New Edition) Question# 55
Which of the following, if true most strongly supports the argument?
(A) People looking to invest in mutual funds currently lack the knowledge to make informed decisions.
(B) Most mutual funds have accumulated large reserves of cash for investor education.
(C) Investing in mutual funds is very different from investing in other financial instruments such as shares and debentures.
(D) Financially literate customers, on the whole, provide more business to mutual fund companies than do financially ignorant ones.
(E) Activities aimed at educating customers cost a lot of money and most mutual funds do not have the cash reserves to conduct such activities.
Original Answer: Option B
Please explain how I should approach this question.
Source: Aristotle Prep CR Grail (New Edition) Question# 55

















