BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

5 in S?

Expert replies
by sanju09 » Thu Mar 22, 2012 2:25 am
If S is a set of ten consecutive integers, is the integer 5 in S?
(1) The integer -3 is in S.
(2) The integer 4 is in S.
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by killer1387 » Thu Mar 22, 2012 3:28 am
sanju09 wrote:If S is a set of ten consecutive integers, is the integer 5 in S?
(1) The integer -3 is in S.
(2) The integer 4 is in S.
IMO E.
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:32 am
sanju09 wrote:If S is a set of ten consecutive integers, is the integer 5 in S?
(1) The integer -3 is in S.
(2) The integer 4 is in S.
Statement 1: The integer -3 is in S.
case a: S = {-5, -4, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4} --> 5 is not in S
case b: S = {-4, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5} --> 5 is in S
INSUFFICIENT

Statement 2: The integer 4 is in S
case a: S = {-5, -4, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4} --> 5 is not in S
case b: S = {-4, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5} --> 5 is in S
INSUFFICIENT

Statements 1 & 2: -3 and 4 are both in S
case a: S = {-5, -4, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4} --> 5 is not in S
case b: S = {-4, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5} --> 5 is in S
INSUFFICIENT

The answer is E

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by Whitney Garner » Thu Mar 22, 2012 9:51 am
sanju09 wrote:If S is a set of ten consecutive integers, is the integer 5 in S?
(1) The integer -3 is in S.
(2) The integer 4 is in S.
A quick way to test is to go with extremes:

(1)
  • - Let -3 be the largest integer...we don't even have to count up, 5 CANNOT be in the set because it is bigger than -3 (the biggest number).
    - Let -3 be the smallest integer...now count up 9 more...6 would be the greatest so 5 WOULD be in the SET.
2 different answers: NOT Sufficient

(2)
Same plan:
  • - Let 4 be the largest integer, then 5 CANNOT be in the set.
    - Let 4 be the smallest, then the next number in the set is 5, so 5 WOULD be in the set.
2 different answers: NOT Sufficient

(1+2)
Same plan:
  • - Let 4 be the largest integer and check to make sure -3 is in the set {4, 3, 2, 1, 0, -1, -2, -3, ...] yep, and in this scenario 5 CANNOT be in the set.
    - Let -3 be the smallest integer and check to make sure that 4 is in the set {-3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6], it is AND so is 5...so 5 WOULD be in the set.
2 different answers: NOT Sufficient

The answer is E

Hope this helps!
:)
Whit
Whitney Garner
GMAT/GRE/EA Instructor & Anxiety/Accommodations Coach
www.whitneygarner.com

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Math is a lot like love - a simple idea that can easily get complicated :heart-eyes:
Join the discussion