BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

OG Houseowners

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Legendary Member
Posts: 2789
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:19 am
Location: Chennai, India
Thanked: 206 times
Followed by:43 members
GMAT Score:640

OG Houseowners

by GmatKiss » Sun Aug 28, 2011 10:45 am
While depressed property values can hurt some large investors, they are potentially devastating for homeowners, whose equity - in many cases representing a life's savings - can plunge or even disappear.

(A) they are potentially devastating for homeowners, whose
(B) they can potentially devastate homeowners in that their
(C) for homeowners they are potentially devastating, because their
(D) for homeowners, it is potentially devastating in that their
(E) it can potentially devastate homeowners, whose

OA is A
Please help in breaking this down!
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Legendary Member
Posts: 1578
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:49 am
Thanked: 82 times
Followed by:9 members
GMAT Score:720

by maihuna » Sun Aug 28, 2011 10:52 am
values require plural they so D/E out. depressed values r not direct agent so B is out. because is used for a reason, we require only a relative pronoun to refer back to the subject so C is out.
GmatKiss wrote:While depressed property values can hurt some large investors, they are potentially devastating for homeowners, whose equity - in many cases representing a life's savings - can plunge or even disappear.

(A) they are potentially devastating for homeowners, whose
(B) they can potentially devastate homeowners in that their
(C) for homeowners they are potentially devastating, because their
(D) for homeowners, it is potentially devastating in that their
(E) it can potentially devastate homeowners, whose

OA is A
Please help in breaking this down!
Charged up again to beat the beast :)
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 627
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:12 am
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:1 members

by mankey » Sun Oct 30, 2011 8:03 pm
Will we also consider here that "can" and "potentially" are redudant?

Someone please help crack this one.

Thanks.
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1031
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 1:23 pm
Location: Malibu, CA
Thanked: 716 times
Followed by:255 members
GMAT Score:750

by Brian@VeritasPrep » Mon Oct 31, 2011 3:19 pm
This is a case in which I think the idea of "decision points" is really helpful.

"Whose" is a relative modifier, and must modify the word adjacent to it. That should tip you off - is "whose" justified here?

In A and E it's used properly to modify "homeowners" (although E has a massive problem with "it" as the pronoun with no singular subject before it). So even though we can't use it to eliminate a choice, the fact that it is there shows us something. Its job is to provide direct clarity - to show that the modifier (equity...) has to clearly modify "homeowners". In the other choices that don't use "whose", the pronoun "their" is used - and "their" really refers back to the subject of the sentence, "values". That's illogical. "Values" don't have life savings or equity. So we can eliminate B C and D based on the use of "their" and not "whose".

Relative modifiers are great decision points - they have such a specific use that they offer terrific insight when they're used, either properly or improperly.
Brian Galvin
GMAT Instructor
Chief Academic Officer
Veritas Prep

Looking for GMAT practice questions? Try out the Veritas Prep Question Bank. Learn More.
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 784
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 3:51 am
Thanked: 114 times
Followed by:12 members

by patanjali.purpose » Mon Oct 31, 2011 5:26 pm
Brian@VeritasPrep wrote:This is a case in which I think the idea of "decision points" is really helpful.

"Whose" is a relative modifier, and must modify the word adjacent to it. That should tip you off - is "whose" justified here?

In A and E it's used properly to modify "homeowners" (although E has a massive problem with "it" as the pronoun with no singular subject before it). So even though we can't use it to eliminate a choice, the fact that it is there shows us something. Its job is to provide direct clarity - to show that the modifier (equity...) has to clearly modify "homeowners". In the other choices that don't use "whose", the pronoun "their" is used - and "their" really refers back to the subject of the sentence, "values". That's illogical. "Values" don't have life savings or equity. So we can eliminate B C and D based on the use of "their" and not "whose".

Relative modifiers are great decision points - they have such a specific use that they offer terrific insight when they're used, either properly or improperly.
Thanks Brain. Great insight.

Could you suggest what other decision points we should keep in mind. Secondly, why do you think 'their' should refer to subject of the sentence.
Top
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1