3 simultaenous equations

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 643
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 4:27 am
Thanked: 48 times
Followed by:7 members

3 simultaenous equations

by vinay1983 » Mon Aug 19, 2013 7:05 pm
Four friends Laura, Nancy, James and Simon buy some pencils, pens and erasers from a shop. Laura buys 5 pencils, 6 pens, and 1 eraser for $17.50. Nancy buts 3 pens, 3 pencils, and 2 erasers for $ 10. James buys 5 pens, 2 pencils, and 5 erasers for $14.50. How much will Simon have to pay if he buys 3 pens, 2 pencils, and 5 erasers?


Note: How often in the GMAT do such questions appear?
Can i have a generic way to solve such questions?
Source: — Problem Solving |

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 283
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 11:56 pm
Location: Bangalore, India
Thanked: 97 times
Followed by:26 members
GMAT Score:750

by ganeshrkamath » Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:02 pm
vinay1983 wrote:Four friends Laura, Nancy, James and Simon buy some pencils, pens and erasers from a shop. Laura buys 5 pencils, 6 pens, and 1 eraser for $17.50. Nancy buts 3 pens, 3 pencils, and 2 erasers for $ 10. James buys 5 pens, 2 pencils, and 5 erasers for $14.50. How much will Simon have to pay if he buys 3 pens, 2 pencils, and 5 erasers?


Note: How often in the GMAT do such questions appear?
Can i have a generic way to solve such questions?
x = pencil
y = pen
e = eraser
17.5 = 5x + 6y + 1e________________(1)
10 = 3x + 3y + 2e _________________(2)
14.5 = 2x + 5y + 5e________________(3)

2*(1) - (2):
35 - 10 = 7x + 9y
25 = 7x + 9y_________________(4)

5*(1) - (3):
87.5-14.5 = 23x + 25y
73 = 23x + 25y_______________(5)

(4)*25 - (5)*9
625 - 657 = 175y - 207x
32 = 32x
x = 1

Substitute x in (4)
25 = 7 + 9y
9y = 18
y = 2

Substitute in x and y in (2):
10 = 3 + 6 + 2e
2e = 1
e = 1/2

Now, to buy 3 pens, 2 pencils and 5 erasers, Simon will have to pay
2x + 3y + 5e = 2 + 6 + 2.5
[spoiler]= $10.5[/spoiler]

Generic method:
1. Solve 2 equations to eliminate one variable.
2. Solve another 2 equatios to eliminate the same variable.
You have now reduced the problem to 2 equations with 2 unknowns.
3. Solve these two equations to get the 2 unknowns.
4. Substitute the unknowns in the original equation to get the third unknown.
I don't know of any other short cut. Suggestions are welcome.

Cheers
Every job is a self-portrait of the person who did it. Autograph your work with excellence.

Kelley School of Business (Class of 2016)
GMAT Score: 750 V40 Q51 AWA 5 IR 8
https://www.beatthegmat.com/first-attemp ... tml#688494

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2630
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
Location: East Bay all the way
Thanked: 625 times
Followed by:119 members
GMAT Score:780

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Mon Aug 19, 2013 9:27 pm
This isn't a very artfully written question: usually these sort of questions (which do appear on the GMAT) have some sort of clever way to combine the equations to solve for the requested variable(s). This one doesn't appear to have a particularly neat solution, but I may be missing it. As far as I can tell this is boring isolation and simplification ... which is NOT something you'll see on the GMAT, as it's time consuming and mindless.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
Elite Legendary Member
Posts: 10392
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Thanked: 2867 times
Followed by:511 members
GMAT Score:800

by [email protected] » Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:06 pm
Hi vinay1983,

I agree with Matt that this question isn't written in "GMAT style." This question is built around a 3-variable "system" of equations, which is a concept that some Test Takers do see (especially if they're doing really well in the Quant section). However, the clunky wording and lack of a "math shortcut" makes this a poor example of the concept.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image