Hard RC. If anyone wants it.

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 86
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 11:00 am
Thanked: 1 times

Hard RC. If anyone wants it.

by TOPGMAT » Tue Jul 12, 2011 8:31 pm
Some writers have so confounded society with government, as to leave little or no distinction between them, whereas they are not only entirely different, but have different origins. Society is a blessing brought forth naturally by our wants, uniting our affections and promoting our happiness. Government is a necessary evil originating from the need to restrain our vices.
Suppose a small number of persons represent the first peopling of any country, or of the world. In this state of natural liberty, a thousand motives will excite them to society: the strength of one is so unequal to his wants, and his mind so unfitted for perpetual solitude, that he is soon obliged to seek assistance and relief from another, who in turn requires the same. Considering the slavish times in which it developed, the form of government known as "•constitutional monarchy"– is granted to have been a noble creation. When the world was overrun with tyranny, the least remove therefrom was a glorious rescue. However, government, if unchecked, evolves over time to a form so complex that a nation may suffer for years without being able to discover in which part the fault lies; and every political physician will advise a different medicine.
Four or five united in a society would be able to raise a dwelling, but one might labour out the period of life without accomplishing anything. Disease or misfortune could soon reduce an individual to a state in which he could easily perish. As time passes, however, in proportion as they surmount their early difficulties, the people will inevitably relax in their duty and attachment to each other; and this laxity will point out the necessity for each to surrender a part of his property in order to establish some form of government to protect the rest. Here then is the origin of government: the inability of moral virtue to govern the world; here, too, is the design and end of government: freedom and security.

And it unanswerably follows that whatever form of government which appears most likely to ensure the protection which constitutes government's essential purpose, with the least expense, is preferable to all others. As the community expands, public concerns will increase and the distance at which the members are separated may render it inconvenient for all to meet on every occasion. Thus the members may consent to leave the legislative part to be managed by a number of chosen representatives, who are supposed to have the same concerns as those who appointed them, and who will act in the same manner as the whole would, if present.
That the interest of every part of the colony may be attended to, the whole may be divided into convenient parts, each part sending its proper number. And so that there be assured a common interest with every part of the community, on which the strength of government depends, prudence will point to the need for frequent elections, thereby assuring that the elected return and mix often with the community.


1. As evidenced by the arguments posed by the author in each paragraph, the primary purpose of the passage is to:
A. chronicle the development of a particular form of government.
B. advocate a simple form of representative government.
C. contrast society and government.
D. distinguish representative government from constitutional monarchy.
E. criticise all forms of government as an unnecessary burden on people


2. The author concluded in the passage that the essential purpose of government is protection of property. In doing so the author assumes that:
I. there actually existed a time in which the disparity between an individual's needs and wants motivated cooperation, and not transgressions against property.
II. the part of property surrendered to establish some form of government is less than that which would be lost if it were left unprotected.
III. the moral laxity resulting from reduction in hardship results in acts against property, rather than failure to assist those experiencing disease or misfortune.
A. I, II, and III
B. II and III only
C. I and II only
D. I and III only
E. II only


3. It can be inferred from the passage that its author would most probably respond to the view that the resources of government should be employed to relieve the effects of poverty by stating that:
A. since the strength of an individual must be recognized to, at times, be unequal to his needs, it is natural for government, once it has evolved, to perform such functions.
B. these activities should be performed by individuals or associations outside of government.
C. since poverty is correlated with crime against property, government must perform these functions if non-governmental efforts are not fully effective.
D. this should be decided by the representatives elected by the people as a whole.
E. relieving poverty would be impossible unless efforts were taken to reduce illiteracy

4. A contemporary of the author wrote: "•Government is a contrivance of human wisdom to provide for human wants. Men have a right that these wants should be provided for by this wisdom."– Based on this quotation and the passage, it can be inferred that the two authors would probably agree with respect to:
A. what constitutes the essential purpose of the government.
B. whether government is justified because it is necessary or because it is beneficial.
C. whether the best form of government is the simplest.
D. whether certain rights of an individual should be recognized in relation to the state.
E. whether dictatorship is better or democracy


OA after some discussion


OK... The OA is [spoiler]B/D/B/D[/spoiler].
The source is RC-99
Last edited by TOPGMAT on Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:18 am, edited 2 times in total.
Never mind what others do; do better than yourself, beat your own record from day to day and you are a success - William Boetcker
Source: — Reading Comprehension |

Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Thu Jul 14, 2011 5:06 am
whats the source topgmat
I Seek Explanations Not Answers

Legendary Member
Posts: 784
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 3:51 am
Thanked: 114 times
Followed by:12 members

by patanjali.purpose » Thu Jul 14, 2011 1:31 pm
IMO [spoiler]A/A/A/B[/spoiler]

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 370
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2011 8:50 pm
Location: Arlington, MA.
Thanked: 27 times
Followed by:2 members

by winniethepooh » Mon Jul 18, 2011 2:59 pm
Can an expert reply?We don't have the OA.
The topic poster didn't post it yet!

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 217
Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 9:42 pm
Thanked: 8 times
Followed by:2 members

by garima99 » Tue Jul 19, 2011 4:03 am

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 86
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 11:00 am
Thanked: 1 times

by TOPGMAT » Wed Jul 27, 2011 8:35 pm
The Explanations are as follows:
1) A rare Global question right off the bat in the section. Remember that a good Global answer will generally include the author's purpose, scope, and topic. What does the author want to accomplish in the passage? The main intent of the passage is to advocate as simple a government as possible. (B) says the same.

2) An assumption question; look for the author's conclusion and evidence. The conclusion is given in the question: the purpose of government is to protect property. What is the author's evidence? Review the passage: The author argues for this conclusion based on the hypothetical history given in ¶s 2 and 3, with the conclusion made in ¶3 when the author discusses "•the necessity for each to surrender a part of his property in order to establish some form of government to protect the rest."– What assumptions are necessary to connect this evidence to the conclusion? The author must first believe that the hypothetical history is valid and that things actually happened in a similar way, which RN I echoes. The author must also assume that when people relax their duties as described in ¶3, that their property is in fact in danger, which RN III states. RN II isn't necessary to the argument: even if the part of property surrendered was greater, the author could still argue that as long as this was the least amount of property necessary to surrender, the government was still legitimate. (D) includes both necessary assumptions.


3) Predict what the author would think about this argument: Since the author believes that government should be kept as simple as possible, and that its only legitimate function is to protect property, he or she wouldn't take kindly to adding another function to government. Looking for an answer choice that reflects this turns up (B), which restates the point: government should stick only to protecting property.

4) First characterize the answer choices: If the right answer is something that the two will agree on, each of the wrong answers represents a point of disagreement. Either find the point of agreement or eliminate statements on which they must disagree. What is the relevance of the quote to the author's argument? While the quote says that government is designed to "•provide for human wants,"– the author argues in ¶1 that society comes from these wants. Any agreement must lie elsewhere. The second part of the quote mentions individual rights, and the author argues in ¶3 that the purpose of government is "•freedom and security."– Therefore, both the author and his contemporary would likely agree that government should respect individual rights; (D) says the same.


Thanks,
TOP
Never mind what others do; do better than yourself, beat your own record from day to day and you are a success - William Boetcker

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 370
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2011 8:50 pm
Location: Arlington, MA.
Thanked: 27 times
Followed by:2 members

by winniethepooh » Thu Jul 28, 2011 1:41 am
Well, you got time to post on it, finally!
Thanks though!
I got last three right.