OG 11 # SC 87

This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:16 pm
Thanked: 1 times

OG 11 # SC 87

by [email protected] » Mon May 26, 2008 4:22 pm
The energy source on Voyager 2 is not a nuclear reactor, in which atoms are actively broken apart; rather a kind of nuclear battery that uses natural radioactive decay to produce power.
(A) apart; rather
(B) apart, but rather
(C) apart, but rather that of
(D) apart, but that of
(E) apart; it is that of


OG ans is B.Why not C?

Thanks
Peer

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 127
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2008 1:02 am
Thanked: 12 times

by jasonc » Mon May 26, 2008 10:56 pm
the energy source is not 'that of a kind of nuclear battery', it is just 'a kind of nuclear battery'.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 10:11 pm

by rattanas » Mon May 26, 2008 11:24 pm
that of and kind of together interpret the same thing..so redundant...