• NEW! FREE Beat The GMAT Quizzes
Hundreds of Questions Highly Detailed Reporting Expert Explanations
• 7 CATs FREE!
If you earn 100 Forum Points

Engage in the Beat The GMAT forums to earn
100 points for $49 worth of Veritas practice GMATs FREE VERITAS PRACTICE GMAT EXAMS Earn 10 Points Per Post Earn 10 Points Per Thanks Earn 10 Points Per Upvote ## OG 11 Question tagged by: ##### This topic has 4 expert replies and 18 member replies Goto page Legendary Member Joined 30 May 2012 Posted: 944 messages Followed by: 4 members Upvotes: 8 Marty Murray wrote: Here is why A is basically irrelevant. The argument uses the discovery of STONE implements as evidence. A is about not about stone implements. A is about CERAMIC implements. Ceramic implements are not stone implements. Stone implements are made from stone. Ceramic implements are made from some kind of material that is formed and then heated to render it hard. So A is about something different from what the argument is about. To rock CR you have to note pretty much every word. Miss the fact that the argument uses one word and an answer choice uses another and you are doomed, DOOOOOMED. LOL Enjoy the game!!! Yes, I didn't realize that GMAT CR would require knowledge of CERAMIC implements and STONE implements - how they differ from one another I considered the term "POTTERY" HOLISTICALLY -- as POTTERY includes both CERAMIC and STONE, I didn't think that any answer choice needs to be evaluated on the basis of the above; rather I presumed that by CERAMIC Option A actually meant POTTERY itself...There I got it wrong! However, though I could be wrong, it seems to be BIT weird that option A hangs on such intricate details of POTTERY! Is it the sole reason to eliminate A ? (could there be any additional reasons to eliminate A because I guess, GMAT GENERALLY doesn't frame Questions on such minute details!) Legendary Member Joined 03 Feb 2014 Posted: 2073 messages Followed by: 133 members Upvotes: 955 GMAT Score: 800 RBBmba@2014 wrote: Marty Murray wrote: Here is why A is basically irrelevant. The argument uses the discovery of STONE implements as evidence. A is about not about stone implements. A is about CERAMIC implements. Ceramic implements are not stone implements. So A is about something different from what the argument is about. Yes, I didn't realize that GMAT CR would require knowledge of CERAMIC implements and STONE implements - how they differ from one another However, though I could be wrong, it seems to be BIT weird that option A hangs on such intricate details of POTTERY! Is it the sole reason to eliminate A ? (could there be any additional reasons to eliminate A because I guess, GMAT GENERALLY doesn't frame Questions on such minute details!) Actually in many cases noticing one key detail like that one is key for getting a CR question right, though in a way I agree with what you are saying. The type of difference that exists between the meanings of words like "pottery", "ceramic" and "stone" is not commonly the key to getting a CR question right. That having been said, you don't need to know the difference between CERAMIC and STONE to get this one right. What you do have to do is to know better than to ASSUME that ceramic is the SAME as stone. _________________ Marty Murray GMAT Coach m.w.murray@hotmail.com https://infinitemindprep.com/ In Person in the New York Area and Online Worldwide Legendary Member Joined 30 May 2012 Posted: 944 messages Followed by: 4 members Upvotes: 8 GMATGuruNY wrote: winnerhere wrote: The earliest Mayan pottery found at Colha, in Belize, is about 3,000 years old. Recently, however, 4,500-year-old stone agricultural implements were unearthed at Colha. These implements resemble Mayan stone implements of a much later period, also found at Colha. Moreover, the implementsâ€™ designs are strikingly different from the designs of stone implements produced by other cultures known to have inhabited the area in prehistoric times. Therefore, there were surely Mayan settlements in Colha 4,500 years ago. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? (A) Ceramic ware is not known to have been used by the Mayan people to make agricultural implements. (B) Carbon-dating of corn pollen in Colha indicates that agriculture began there around 4,500 years ago. (C) Archaeological evidence indicates that some of the oldest stone implements found at Colha were used to cut away vegetation after controlled burning of trees to open areas of swampland for cultivation. (D) Successor cultures at a given site often adopt the style of agricultural implements used by earlier inhabitants of the same site. (E) Many religious and social institutions of the Mayan people who inhabited Colha 3,000 years ago relied on a highly developed system of agricultural symbols. OA : Later To weaken the conclusion, attack the assumption. Assumption: Because the 4500 year-old implements resemble Mayan implements of a later period, the Mayans must have made the 4500 year-old implements. The correct answer will suggest that the Mayans did not make the 4500 year-old implements. Answer choice D does just what we need. It suggests that another culture made the 4500 year-old implements and that the Mayans -- the successor culture -- adopted the style of these implements. If the Mayans adopted the style of this earlier culture, then there is no proof that the Mayans were in Colha 4500 years ago. The correct answer is D. Hi GMATGuruNY, Though I understand your above explanation, I got a doubt to clarify - "the implementsâ€™ designs are strikingly different from the designs of stone implements produced by other cultures known to have inhabited the area in prehistoric times" -- this PART is stated in the ARGUMENT,hence it's TRUE. Therefore, the OA seems to CONTRADICT this PREMISE in the ARGUMENT, I guess. Thoughts ? ### GMAT/MBA Expert Legendary Member Joined 14 Jan 2015 Posted: 2667 messages Followed by: 122 members Upvotes: 1153 GMAT Score: 770 Quote: "the implementsâ€™ designs are strikingly different from the designs of stone implements produced by other cultures known to have inhabited the area in prehistoric times" -- this PART is stated in the ARGUMENT,hence it's TRUE. Therefore, the OA seems to CONTRADICT this PREMISE in the ARGUMENT, I guess. No contradiction here. If successor cultures often adopt the styles of their predecessors, it doesn't mean they always do. So the style of the implements found at Colha were different than whatever came before. You're right that this is a given. But the Mayans in Belize (who came after whoever settled in Colha) may well have modeled the style of their tools on the implements found in Colhas. _________________ Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor Veritas Prep Reviews Save$100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course

Enroll in a Veritas Prep GMAT class completely for FREE. Wondering if a GMAT course is right for you? Attend the first class session of an actual GMAT course, either in-person or live online, and see for yourself why so many students choose to work with Veritas Prep. Find a class now!
Legendary Member
Joined
30 May 2012
Posted:
944 messages
Followed by:
4 members
8
DavidG@VeritasPrep wrote:
Quote:
"the implementsâ€™ designs are strikingly different from the designs of stone implements produced by other cultures known to have inhabited the area in prehistoric times" -- this PART is stated in the ARGUMENT,hence it's TRUE. Therefore, the OA seems to CONTRADICT this PREMISE in the ARGUMENT, I guess.
No contradiction here. If successor cultures often adopt the styles of their predecessors, it doesn't mean they always do. So the style of the implements found at Colha were different than whatever came before. You're right that this is a given. But the Mayans in Belize (who came after whoever settled in Colha) may well have modeled the style of their tools on the implements found in Colhas.
Hi Dave,
Don't really get this! Would it be possible for your to elaborate ?

Per the ARGUMENT,If the styles of Mayans' predecessors are strikingly DIFFERENT from those of Mayans, then how we can say any Option indicating that the Mayans ADOPTED the styles of the earlier inhabitants/their predecessors doesn't CONTRADICT the PREMISE in RED as mentioned in the ARGUMENT ?

### GMAT/MBA Expert

Legendary Member
Joined
14 Jan 2015
Posted:
2667 messages
Followed by:
122 members
1153
GMAT Score:
770
RBBmba@2014 wrote:
DavidG@VeritasPrep wrote:
Quote:
"the implementsâ€™ designs are strikingly different from the designs of stone implements produced by other cultures known to have inhabited the area in prehistoric times" -- this PART is stated in the ARGUMENT,hence it's TRUE. Therefore, the OA seems to CONTRADICT this PREMISE in the ARGUMENT, I guess.
No contradiction here. If successor cultures often adopt the styles of their predecessors, it doesn't mean they always do. So the style of the implements found at Colha were different than whatever came before. You're right that this is a given. But the Mayans in Belize (who came after whoever settled in Colha) may well have modeled the style of their tools on the implements found in Colhas.
Hi Dave,
Don't really get this! Would it be possible for your to elaborate ?

Per the ARGUMENT,If the styles of Mayans' predecessors are strikingly DIFFERENT from those of Mayans, then how we can say any Option indicating that the Mayans ADOPTED the styles of the earlier inhabitants/their predecessors doesn't CONTRADICT the PREMISE in RED as mentioned in the ARGUMENT ?
The misunderstanding lies here: If the styles of Mayans' predecessors are strikingly DIFFERENT from those of Mayans.
The style of the Mayans' predecessors is different from the style of whoever came before them, not from that of the Mayans, who seem to have come after. Think of three different time periods.

T1: Pre-Colha
T2: Colha
T3: Mayans (Belize)

The argument is claiming that what's found in T2 is different from what had been found in T1. It's no contradiction to claim that what was found in T3 has similarities to what was found in T2. Make sense?

_________________
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course Enroll in a Veritas Prep GMAT class completely for FREE. Wondering if a GMAT course is right for you? Attend the first class session of an actual GMAT course, either in-person or live online, and see for yourself why so many students choose to work with Veritas Prep. Find a class now! Legendary Member Joined 30 May 2012 Posted: 944 messages Followed by: 4 members Upvotes: 8 DavidG@VeritasPrep wrote: The misunderstanding lies here: If the styles of Mayans' predecessors are strikingly DIFFERENT from those of Mayans. The style of the Mayans' predecessors is different from the style of whoever came before them, not from that of the Mayans, who seem to have come after. Think of three different time periods. T1: Pre-Colha T2: Colha T3: Mayans (Belize) The argument is claiming that what's found in T2 is different from what had been found in T1. It's no contradiction to claim that what was found in T3 has similarities to what was found in T2. Make sense? Hi Dave, Got a doubt on this : Option D is a GENERIC statement WITHOUT a DIRECT reference to any SPECIFIC "time period" and hence can be applied to any time period such as T1/T2/T3...Isn't it ? If so, then doesn't Option D seem to CONTRADICT the ARGUMENT which says what's found in T2 is different from what had been found in T1 ? Because per Option D, Successor culture (from T2) can adopt the style of earlier culture (from T1) -- that's a clear CONTRADICTION, I guess! (Pretty confusing) Thoughts ? ### GMAT/MBA Expert Legendary Member Joined 14 Jan 2015 Posted: 2667 messages Followed by: 122 members Upvotes: 1153 GMAT Score: 770 RBBmba@2014 wrote: DavidG@VeritasPrep wrote: The misunderstanding lies here: If the styles of Mayans' predecessors are strikingly DIFFERENT from those of Mayans. The style of the Mayans' predecessors is different from the style of whoever came before them, not from that of the Mayans, who seem to have come after. Think of three different time periods. T1: Pre-Colha T2: Colha T3: Mayans (Belize) The argument is claiming that what's found in T2 is different from what had been found in T1. It's no contradiction to claim that what was found in T3 has similarities to what was found in T2. Make sense? Hi Dave, Got a doubt on this : Option D is a GENERIC statement WITHOUT a DIRECT reference to any SPECIFIC "time period" and hence can be applied to any time period such as T1/T2/T3...Isn't it ? If so, then doesn't Option D seem to CONTRADICT the ARGUMENT which says what's found in T2 is different from what had been found in T1 ? Because per Option D, Successor culture (from T2) can adopt the style of earlier culture (from T1) -- that's a clear CONTRADICTION, I guess! (Pretty confusing) Thoughts ? There's no contradiction in claiming that something "often" happens and then pointing out an instance in which the phenomenon did not occur. Imagine you're an archaeologist. You find pottery that's 4500 years old. It's stylistically different from what came before. Moreover, the new pottery is stylistically similar to the Mayan pottery that came after. You're trying to determine if the same culture produced the pottery you found as well as the pottery that came after. If cultures often borrow styles from previous inhabitants, it would muddy the picture - you wouldn't know if the similarities existed because the same culture produced both or because one culture adopted a style from a previous one. You would, however, be able to deduce that the pottery from 4500 years ago was likely produced by a different culture than what came before, but that's not what we're trying to determine here. _________________ Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor Veritas Prep Reviews Save$100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course

Enroll in a Veritas Prep GMAT class completely for FREE. Wondering if a GMAT course is right for you? Attend the first class session of an actual GMAT course, either in-person or live online, and see for yourself why so many students choose to work with Veritas Prep. Find a class now!
• 1 Hour Free
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
Register now and save up to $200 Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Free Trial & Practice Exam BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • 5-Day Free Trial 5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Get 300+ Practice Questions 25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • 5 Day FREE Trial Study Smarter, Not Harder Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Free Practice Test & Review How would you score if you took the GMAT Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Free Veritas GMAT Class Experience Lesson 1 Live Free Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Magoosh Study with Magoosh GMAT prep Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • FREE GMAT Exam Know how you'd score today for$0

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

### Top First Responders*

1 Ian Stewart 57 first replies
2 Brent@GMATPrepNow 31 first replies
3 Jay@ManhattanReview 29 first replies
4 GMATGuruNY 20 first replies
5 ceilidh.erickson 15 first replies
* Only counts replies to topics started in last 30 days
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members

### Most Active Experts

1 Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

211 posts
2 Max@Math Revolution

Math Revolution

88 posts
3 Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

70 posts
4 Ian Stewart

GMATiX Teacher

65 posts
5 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

39 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts