BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG (10th ed) - SC - #43 ) Multiple Modifiers -How to arrange

Expert replies

by anantbhatia » Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:25 pm
"exited with" in (E) is incorrect usage.
Join the discussion

by FightWithGMAT » Thu Aug 19, 2010 3:25 am
GMATMadeEasy wrote:43. In the minds of many people living in England, before Australia was Australia, it was the antipodes, the opposite pole to civilization, an obscure and unimagin­able place that was considered the end of the world.

(A) before Australia was Australia, it was the antipodes

(B) before there was Australia, it was the antipodes

(C) it was the antipodes that was Australia

(D) Australia was what was the antipodes

(E) Australia was what had been known as the antipodes

Correct answer is A .

i infer from correct answer that the last two modifiers (the opposite pole to civilization, an obscure and unimagin­able place that was considered the end of the world. ) or appositive more precisely are correctly used. But I am not sure of reasoing that can be used to explain.

If I turn the question this way,
The opposite pole to civilization, an obscure and unimagin­able place that was considered the end of the world, the antipodes is knows as Austalia today.
, is the usage of modifier is correct ? How and Why ? I hope some experts can throw their advise on this.
POE will lead us to A. But I have a basic question, maybe I am missing something.....
Should not the option A be...

before Australia was Australia, it had been the antipodes
Join the discussion

by GMATMadeEasy » Thu Aug 19, 2010 7:24 am
May be we need to ask the expert as modifiers are delicate to handle :) .
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Fri Sep 10, 2010 5:44 am
in reply to the original post:
GMATMadeEasy wrote:i infer from correct answer that the last two modifiers (the opposite pole to civilization, an obscure and unimagin­able place that was considered the end of the world. ) or appositive more precisely are correctly used. But I am not sure of reasoing that can be used to explain.
you are correct -- the last two modifiers are appositives.
i'm not really sure what you mean by "reasoning", as you appear to have already identified what's going on.

the only thing that i think you might be asking about is the order of the appositives -- is that what you're asking about?
if so, then that's pretty random -- those are just two appositives, for which the directions are basically the same (put them after the noun "antipodes"). since you obviously can't put both of them immediately after the noun -- you have to put one after the other -- they've chosen the phrasing in which the shorter of the two appositives is used first, in order to make the sentence more easily readable.

as an analogy, see the orange and blue examples in the following link. it's not an exact analogy, since they aren't appositives, but it's the same sort of deal (the order of 2 constructions is dependent on their relative length):
https://www.beatthegmat.com/introductory ... tml#234030
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Fri Sep 10, 2010 5:44 am
If I turn the question this way,
The opposite pole to civilization, an obscure and unimagin­able place that was considered the end of the world, the antipodes is knows as Austalia today.
, is the usage of modifier is correct ? How and Why ? I hope some experts can throw their advise on this.
you could do that, yes, although the meaning of the sentence has now been distorted (i.e., the sentence doesn't have the correct meaning anymore).
i.e., the original sentence talks about australia (a given place that exists in objective reality), noting that it was once known as the antipodes. this new sentence, on the other hand, appears to be talking about "the antipodes" as though that's a place that exists in objective reality, and about "australia" as an incidental label; that's the wrong meaning.
the grammar, on the other hand, is fine.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion