BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 25
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 8 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

If Marcel Proust’s memory....

Expert replies
by giovanni.gastone » Fri Apr 01, 2011 4:47 am
SOURCE: PrincetonReview

If Marcel Proust's memory had not been stirred by the felicitous taste of a madeleine, he might never have been moved to write Remembrance of Things Past.

A. had not been stirred by the felicitous taste of a madeleine
B. had not been stirred by means of the felicitous taste of a madeleine
C. were not to be stirred by the felicitous taste of a madeleine
D. were not to be stirred by the taste of a felicitous madeleine
E. should not be stirred by the felicitous taste of a madeleine

OA: A

PrincetonReview's Explanation: "Yes. This is correct as written."
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by giovanni.gastone » Fri Apr 01, 2011 4:58 am
Does anyone else agree that there seems to be a problem with the lack of a clear antecedent for "he"? Am I wrong, or does it seem like PR's grammar seems off?
Join the discussion

by atulmangal » Fri Apr 01, 2011 5:16 am
giovanni.gastone wrote:Does anyone else agree that there seems to be a problem with the lack of a clear antecedent for "he"? Am I wrong, or does it seem like PR's grammar seems off?
I agree with you, i think all the choices are INCORRECT as HE has no referent...it can not refer to possessive Marcel Proust's...secondly in IF clause past perfect is used and in the following clause present perfect is used...is this correct???
Join the discussion

by HSPA » Fri Apr 01, 2011 5:22 am
How is this " If I WERE you" kind of statement is missing here???

Is this MOOD for only first and second person???
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion

by aspirant2011 » Fri Apr 01, 2011 9:49 am
we don't require a subjunctive mood over here,therefore,the usage of "if i were" for this following sentence is not correct, though I agree in A "he" doesn't have a clear antecedent but out of the 5 choices the best one seems to be A................
Join the discussion

by force5 » Fri Apr 01, 2011 3:02 pm
I will go with A . As far as "HE" is concerned yes it is grammatically incorrect but it is not hurting us.
Join the discussion

by giovanni.gastone » Fri Apr 01, 2011 6:35 pm
Thanks guys. Yeah, I know this is really not an issue, and the correct answer is obvious either way, but I wanted to make sure I was correctly spotting grammatical errors. Thanks!
Join the discussion

by tetura84 » Sat Apr 02, 2011 1:26 pm
I would rather prefer to avoid these kind of questions (and sources as well :-)) because this would only add confusion in my understanding.
This sentence is clearly wrongly written. He cannot refer back to Marcel P.
Remember,
Possessive noun + non-possessive pronoun (subject or object pronoun) IS NOT OK.
All other combinations are OK.
78 clicks can change my life !
Join the discussion

by Jim@Grockit » Mon Apr 04, 2011 7:13 am
tetura84 wrote:I would rather prefer to avoid these kind of questions (and sources as well :-)) because this would only add confusion in my understanding.
This sentence is clearly wrongly written. He cannot refer back to Marcel P.
Remember,
Possessive noun + non-possessive pronoun (subject or object pronoun) IS NOT OK.
All other combinations are OK.
Just to be clear, it's wrong only because we lack context. If Marcel Proust had been the subject of an entire paragraph and there were no other male human mentioned in it, the sentence would be fine.

I know you may well have been speaking of the GMAT only in saying it's wrong, but since you all will go on to write many proposals, analyses, and memos in your MBA programs, I feel the need to point out where GMAT-correct deviates from Real English-correct.
Join the discussion

by gig92 » Tue Apr 05, 2011 4:35 am
giovanni.gastone wrote:Does anyone else agree that there seems to be a problem with the lack of a clear antecedent for "he"? Am I wrong, or does it seem like PR's grammar seems off?
The sentence:
If Marcel Proust's memory had not been stirred by the felicitous taste of a madeleine, he might never have been moved to write Remembrance of Things Past.

Look again:
If Marcel Proust's memory had not been stirred by the felicitous taste of a madeleine

Here the main subject is Marcel Proust (and main noun Marcel Proust's memory) - Ok - followed by a description - this makes the whole clause "a noun phrase" and "he" which follows after "comma" acts as "conjunction" describing the subject (Marcel Proust).

Thus ans: A

B is wordier and clumsy
C,D, grammatically incorrect either due to subject-verb and tense errors.
E tense error.
gig92
Join the discussion

by preeti6 » Tue Apr 05, 2011 8:28 am
Wouldnt this snetence represent a hypothetical subjunctive format? Then wouldn't D that uses "were" be right?
Join the discussion

by gig92 » Tue Apr 05, 2011 10:32 am
preeti6 wrote:Wouldnt this snetence represent a hypothetical subjunctive format? Then wouldn't D that uses "were" be right?
If it were a hypothetical subjunctive, we can write it "If Marcel Proust's memory were not stirred"... "to be" would be unnecessary here..
gig92
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Tue Apr 05, 2011 11:07 am
Surprisingl, no one has commented on the very precise Explanation given by PR . The OE has nothing to learn.
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion