BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

tricky

Expert replies
by finance » Wed Jul 27, 2011 3:42 am
What is the greatest integer in a set of
five different positive integers if 1 is the
smallest integer in the set?
(1) The average (arithmetic mean) of
all integers is 4 and the median of
the set is also 4.
(2) The set contains only 1 even
number.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Brian@VeritasPrep » Wed Jul 27, 2011 9:19 am
Great question, finance!

I'll let everyone get a fair shot at this one before I solve it, but let me offer a strategic tip here, one we call "Why Are You Here?". If a statement on its own is clearly (and almost insultingly) insufficient, it's there for a reason. Either you need it with statement 1 or they're trying to make you think you need it. Either way, you have to consider it specifically because the author of the question wouldn't use one of only three items he gets to write as a total throwaway. It's there for a reason.

So my question is: Why does statement 2 only allow for one even number?
Brian Galvin
GMAT Instructor
Chief Academic Officer
Veritas Prep

Looking for GMAT practice questions? Try out the Veritas Prep Question Bank. Learn More.
Join the discussion

by GAMATO » Wed Jul 27, 2011 10:24 am
IMO C

Let's say the 5 integers are 1, a, b, c and d. ( in ascending order).
Also, a, b, c and d all are positive distinct integers.

Statement 1:

(1 + a + b + c + d)/5 = 4
(1 + a + b + c + d) = 20

As median is also 4 we get b = 4.
So a can be either 2 or 3
Case 1: a = 2
(1 + 2 + 4 + c + d) = 20
c + d = 20 - ( 1 + 2 + 4) = 13
We know c has to be greater than 4.
if c = 5 then d = 8
if c = 6 then d = 7
if c = 7 then d = 6 ( Invalid as d > c)

Case 2: a = 3
(1 + 3 + 4 + c + d) = 20
c + d = 20 - ( 1 + 3 + 4) = 12
We know c has to be greater than 4.
if c = 5 then d = 7
if c = 6 then d = 6 ( Invalid as c and d are different integer)

So, St 1 is Insufficient.

Statement 2:
St 2 is insufficient as the only thing we know is that there is only 1 even integer.

Combining 1 and 2 :
Case 1 of St 1 explained above ( a = 2) is not possible as we know that c = 4 and no other integer in the set can be even.
So a = 3.
for a = 3, c must be 5 and d must be 7 (refer case 2 of statement 1 above) . Sufficient.


finance wrote:What is the greatest integer in a set of
five different positive integers if 1 is the
smallest integer in the set?
(1) The average (arithmetic mean) of
all integers is 4 and the median of
the set is also 4.
(2) The set contains only 1 even
number.
Join the discussion

by clock60 » Wed Jul 27, 2011 12:42 pm
for sure i am wrong but my pick is A
we have set of integers
1.a2.a3.a4.a5, and need to find a5 -greatest
(1)1+a2+a3+a4+a5=20, with median a3=4,
to make a5 greatest, first least value for a2 is 2, and least for a4=5, the remainder for a5=20-(1+2+4+5)=8,so given set looks like
1,2,4,5,8
as for st 2 really don`t know how to apply, but want to replenish my mind
Join the discussion

by ColumbiaVC » Wed Jul 27, 2011 12:59 pm
Join the discussion

by finance » Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:00 pm
Brian@VeritasPrep wrote:Great question, finance!

I'll let everyone get a fair shot at this one before I solve it, but let me offer a strategic tip here, one we call "Why Are You Here?". If a statement on its own is clearly (and almost insultingly) insufficient, it's there for a reason. Either you need it with statement 1 or they're trying to make you think you need it. Either way, you have to consider it specifically because the author of the question wouldn't use one of only three items he gets to write as a total throwaway. It's there for a reason.

So my question is: Why does statement 2 only allow for one even number?
Hi Brian!

Thank you for your approach! I was mistaken to choose A because of the well-known statement"when numbers in a set are evenly distributed, then mean equal to median" but I see it now that the reverse of this statement does not have to be true...even though there is still somehow a symmetrical distribution of the numbers..
Join the discussion

by akhilsuhag » Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:08 pm
I am tryin my luck here, I wud look at it this way:

Statement 1:

If we look at the same mean and median we can assume it to be an evenly spaced series and go ahead and solve. This gives the number as 7.

It seems Statement 1 is sufficient

Statement 2:

But as soon as you read statement 2 u realize it cant be an evenly spaced series, so your earlier assumption was wrong.
Statement 2 on its own is INSUFFICIENT. But it helps you determine that statement 1 also was Insufficient.

Statement 1 & 2 together:

The mean and median is 4. The first term is 1. Since the median is 4 it has to be the 3rd term.

Now the terms are 1,a,4,b,c.

Now since their is just 1 even number, a has to be 3 (the only odd between 1 and 4).

So the terms are 1,3,4,b,c.

Now the mean is (8+b+c)/5=4.

i.e b+c = 12;

two possibilities 5,7 or 6,6. Since only one odd allowed and that was 4. it has to be 5,7.

So the largest integer is 7.

TOGETHER THEY ARE SUFFICIENT.
Join the discussion

by akhilsuhag » Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:11 pm
Kindly let me know if my approach was fine.. or where did i miss out.

Thanks
Join the discussion

by Brian@VeritasPrep » Wed Jul 27, 2011 2:14 pm
Great work on this one, everyone - and akhilsuhag you're right on with your approach once you got to statement 2.

For both finance and akhilsuhag - you nailed it in your explanations; while it's true that for an evenly spaced set the mean and median are the same, that doesn't mean that the inverse is also true.

_________________________________________________________________________________________

One way to think about this one is that, to average 4, you need an equal amount above 4 and below 4. And you're already at -3 by using 1 (you're 3 below the average). Your options for x are 2 and 3, and you can note those as -2 and -1 if you're just gauging distance from the mean.

So on the left hand side of the average, 4, you have either -4 or -5, meaning that you have 4 or 5 numbers to play with on the right. So you can either have +1 and +3 (because you can't have them equal), +2 and +3, or +1 and +4.

NOTE: This is pretty convoluted in writing but if you get the logic, what I really did much more quickly and intuitively in my head was say that my options are:

1, 2, 4 -- I need to distribute 5 places above 4, so:

1, 2, 4, 5, 8
or
1, 2, 4, 6, 7

1, 3, 4 -- I need to distribute 4 places above 4, so:

1, 3, 4, 5, 7

And statement 2 tells me that I can't use the first option, so I'm stuck with the last one and the high end of 7.

Strategically, you can use statement 2 to make statement 1 pretty clear. Say you thought statement 1 was clearly not sufficient - statement 2 forces you to try numbers just to get a feel for what is even possible. It puts a strange restriction on what is even possible, so it makes you work to make the options more concrete. The fact that they said you couldn't use even numbers means you just have to try a few numbers to see whether that's a severe restriction or not. Could you have used even numbers? (Yes.) Are there many options with only odd numbers? (Nope. Just one, so it's sufficient with both statements together)
Brian Galvin
GMAT Instructor
Chief Academic Officer
Veritas Prep

Looking for GMAT practice questions? Try out the Veritas Prep Question Bank. Learn More.
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Wed Jul 27, 2011 3:05 pm
finance wrote:What is the greatest integer in a set of
five different positive integers if 1 is the
smallest integer in the set?
(1) The average (arithmetic mean) of
all integers is 4 and the median of
the set is also 4.
(2) The set contains only 1 even
number.
the answer should be C.
for eg. if there are 5 integers in the set than the mean is 20 (5*4=20)
than the only option would be 1,3,4,5,7 (Thus the mean and median are both 4). The greatest integer is 7
But if there are only 3 integer than the mean is 12 (3*4= 12).
than the only option would be 1,4,7 (Thus the mean and median are both 4). These are the only two option possible . we can't create another set in which there is only 1 even no and the median and mean to be 4 because if we try to take digit 5 than the condition of 4 being a median will not be possible
Join the discussion