BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

stupid question

Expert replies
by tttrn333 » Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:01 am
Did one of the three members of a certain team sell at least 2 raffle tickets yesterday?

(1) the 3 members sold a total of 6 raffle tickets yesterday
(2) No 2 of the members sold the same number of raffle tickets yesterday


Got this in gmatprep. I am the only one who interpreted this problem as only one of the 3 members got at least 2?

The correct interpretation is did at least one get at least 2. I don't see how you can pick one over the other in this case. I did literal interpretation.

Am I wrong?
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by shankar.ashwin » Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:20 am
Answer should be D

From (1) We could have any possibility such as (0,0,6)(1,1,4) or (2,2,2). But atleast one of the 3 should definitely sell a min of 2 tickets. Sufficient

From (2) diff number could be (0,1,5)(1,2,3) (0,2,4). Again one of them surely has to sell atleast 2.

And I think you did interpret the question correctly because it asks if one of the 3 sells and not all 3 sell 2 tickets
Join the discussion

by tttrn333 » Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:39 am
From your example, 0,0,6 => has 1 person higher than 2, 1,1,4=> has 1 person higher than 2, but 2,2,2 => has 3 people higher than 2.

So just from those examples there are two possibilities, 1 person higher than 2 and 3 people higher than 2. The question asks, Do one of them have higher than 2? No right? cuz as you demonstrated thats there are at least 2 possibilities.
shankar.ashwin wrote:Answer should be D

From (1) We could have any possibility such as (0,0,6)(1,1,4) or (2,2,2). But atleast one of the 3 should definitely sell a min of 2 tickets. Sufficient

From (2) diff number could be (0,1,5)(1,2,3) (0,2,4). Again one of them surely has to sell atleast 2.

And I think you did interpret the question correctly because it asks if one of the 3 sells and not all 3 sell 2 tickets
Join the discussion

by shankar.ashwin » Wed Oct 05, 2011 3:07 am
Ah! like that... No you read the question wrong I guess...

It asks if any of them sell atleast 2 ( not the number as such). They would rephrase the question as "How many of the 3 sold atleast 2 tickets'?
Join the discussion

by tttrn333 » Wed Oct 05, 2011 3:18 am
yeah thats my question. i was wrong cuz the answer suggest otherwise but can u really say that my interpretation is wrong?
shankar.ashwin wrote:Ah! like that... No you read the question wrong I guess...

It asks if any of them sell atleast 2 ( not the number as such). They would rephrase the question as "How many of the 3 sold atleast 2 tickets'?
Join the discussion

by shankar.ashwin » Wed Oct 05, 2011 3:52 am
As I said, you misinterpreted the question. For your solution, they would typically frame the question like 'How many' and not just 'Did one of the the three'. I dont think its ambiguous to be misinterpreted. You just need to figure out what they ask, and as for any GMAT word problem, be careful you understand the question correctly, I would spend a little more time to check if they really asked for what I found after solving.

Practice a few word problems and you should be fine.
tttrn333 wrote:yeah thats my question. i was wrong cuz the answer suggest otherwise but can u really say that my interpretation is wrong?
Join the discussion

by sl750 » Wed Oct 05, 2011 4:44 am
The prompt asks whether 1 of the 3 members sold at least 2 tickets. At least 2 tickets implies 2 or more. Atmost 2 tickets would imply less than 2 tickets

Statement 1
We can have 2,2,2 or 1,2,3 or 0,0,6. In all cases one or more members have sold 2 or more tickets. Sufficient

Statement 2
Let's try out the worst case scenario. Since we are not told how many tickets were sold.
0,1,2, as each member sold a different number of tickets. We can see that one member has sold 2 tickets. Sufficient
Join the discussion

by tpr-becky » Wed Oct 05, 2011 7:54 pm
It just says one - it does not specify only or at least so you need to see if one sold the tickts - however, if one sold the tickets it does not limit others from doing so as well - if one did then it is possible for two to sell the same number of tickets. So the proper interpretation would be 1 or more (which can be restated as "at least"). If the test wanted to ask a question about only one it would have to use the word only - Only will never be ambiguous.
Becky
Master GMAT Instructor
The Princeton Review
Irvine, CA
Join the discussion