There's a bit of a trick in this problem, and it illustrates the danger of picking numbers. First, statement 2 is sufficient:
(2) When x+y is divided by y the remainder is 4.
Notice (this will be important when we look at Statement 1) that when you divide by y, the remainder must be less than y, by definition. So if Statement 2 is true, y must be larger than 4. Writing the information in the statement using the standard remainder equation (n = qd + r):
x + y = qy + 4
x = (q-1)y + 4
so x is 4 larger than a multiple of y, and 4 is the remainder when x is divided by y.
(1) When x is divided by 2y, the remainder is 4.
Notice here that the remainder must be less than 2y- that is, 4 < 2y, or y > 2. Writing this statement using the standard remainder equation:
x = 2y*q + 4
x = (2q)*y + 4
So x is 4 larger than a multiple of y. As long as y > 4, then 4 will certainly be the remainder when x is divided by y, and if you test numbers here, and only choose values of y that are larger than 4, you will likely begin to think that 1) is sufficient. It isn't sufficient; if y is equal to 4, for example, then x could be 12. Then the remainder is 4 when x is divided by 2y, but is zero when x is divided by y. Insufficient.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com
ianstewartgmat.com