BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

x/y < b/c ?

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by LalaB » Wed Jan 25, 2012 10:08 am
x/y < b/c can be written as xc <by . it is the same as the 1st stmnt (cx-yb<0 or cx<0+by cx<by)
Join the discussion

by Whitney Garner » Wed Feb 01, 2012 9:48 am
LalaB wrote:x/y < b/c can be written as xc <by . it is the same as the 1st stmnt (cx-yb<0 or cx<0+by cx<by)
Hi LalaB!

This is true ONLY if we know that C & Y have the same signs (if only one is negative, then the signs will switch direction).

In fact, this is a pretty tough problem. From the stem we actually have a 2-step question:

Question Stem:

If we know that cy>0, then is xc<by?
If we know that cy<0, then is xc>by?

We have to know BOTH the relationship between xc and by, as well as the sign for cy.

Statement 1: cx < yb
We know that xc<by, but we don't know if cy>0... Not Sufficient.

Statement 2: bx < cy
If we know that bx<cy, that doesn't tell us about the xc<by relationship OR enable us to determine if cy is positive or negative... Not Sufficient.

Statement 1+2: cx < yb & bx < cy
The only real way to combine these is to stack and add and hope that something simplifies...

xc<by
+bx<cy
------
xc + bx < by + cy
x(b+c) < y(b+c)

So, if (b+c)>0, then x<y.
and if (b+c)<0, then x>y...
But this doesn't tell us the information me need to know...Not Sufficient.

**Picking Numbers**

I will warn you up front that picking numbers for this problem is fairly AWFUL (it took me a while to come up with sets of numbers for 4 variables that make the statements true, but then give both a Yes and a No answer to the question stem (proving insufficiency). But I will show you a few of those sets here.

Statement 1: cx < yb
Option 1: {b=-1, c=-1, x=6, y=2}
cx < yb --> (-1)(6)<(2)(-1) --> -6 < -2 Fits the constraint of the Statement.

Is x/y < b/c? 6/2<-1/-1 --> 3 < 1 NO!

Option 2: {b=-6, c=-2, x=1, y=-1}
cx < yb --> (-2)(1)<(-1)(-6) --> -2 < 6 Fits the constraint of the Statement.

Is x/y < b/c? --> 1/-1 < -6/-2 --> -1<3 YES!

Two different answers to the question...NOT Sufficient


Statement 2: bx < cy
Option 1: {b=-1, c=-1, x=6, y=2}
bx<cy --> (-1)(6)<(-1)(2) --> -6<-2 Fits the constraint of the Statement.

Is x/y < b/c? 6/2<-1/-1 --> 3<1 NO!

Option 2: {b=-6, c=-2, x=1, y=-1}
bx<cy --> (-6)(1)<(-2)(-1) --> -6<2 Fits the constraint of the Statement.

Is x/y < b/c? --> 1/-1 < -6/-2 --> -1<3 YES!

Two different answers to the question...NOT Sufficient

Statement 1+2: cx < yb & bx < cy
Notice that I used the same numbers for Options 1 and 2 when testing each statement. I did so because it saves me time when looking at them together. I can see that I have 2 sets of numbers that fit all of the Statement constraints, but they give me 2 different answers for the Question Stem... NOT Sufficient

Therefore, the correct answer is E.

Hope this clears up some of the confusion!
:)
Whit
Whitney Garner
GMAT/GRE/EA Instructor & Anxiety/Accommodations Coach
www.whitneygarner.com

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Math is a lot like love - a simple idea that can easily get complicated :heart-eyes:
Join the discussion