Functions & Absolute value

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 768
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 4:18 pm
Location: Berkeley, CA
Thanked: 387 times
Followed by:140 members

by Mike@Magoosh » Sun Jan 22, 2012 12:13 pm
Hi, there. I'm happy to help with this. :)

Prompt: S = x^3 + 3^x. Is S > 0

Notice that 3^x by itself is > 0 for all real values of x. By contrast, x^3 > 0 when x > 0, and x^3 < 0 when x < 0. When x > 0, both (3^x) and (x^3) are positive, so S must be positive.

This question is about the sum, so it's implicitly about how fast exponential function (e.g. 3^x) change with respect to power functions (x^3). This is a very advanced idea for GMAT math. In general, when exponential functions take off to infinity, they wildly outrun power functions.

Statement #1: x < 0

When x < 0, we know (x^3) is negative and (3^x) is positive. Let's try some values.

x = -1 --> S = (-1)^3 + 3^(-1) = -1 + 1/3 = -2/3 < 0

x = -2 --> S = (-2)^3 + 3^(-2) = -8 + 1/9 < 0

For these first two values of x, S is negative. As x gets more and more negative, (x^3) will be negative numbers of increasing magnitude, while (3^x) will be positive fractions getting closer and closer to zero, so S will get more and more negative.
That takes care of big negative values, but what happens we x is negative but between 0 and -1. Let's try some numbers there

x = -0.5 --> S = (-0.5)^3 + 3^(-0.5) = -1/8 + 1/sqrt(3)

sqrt(3) < 8, so 1/sqrt(3) > 1/8, so S is positive.

So, we can get negative values of x that make S either positive or negative, so Statement #1 is insufficient.

Statement #2: |x| > 1
Well, if x = anything positive, say x = 3, then S is positive. As we saw, if x = -2, S is negative. Knowing x has an absolute value greater than one, by itself, tells us nothing. Statement #2 is insufficient.

Statements #1 & #2 combined:
Now, we know x < 0 and |x| > 1, which means x < -1, in other words, x is a negative number with an absolute value greater than -1. Back in the argument under statement #1, we already saw that S is negative when x = -1, x = -2, and all larger negative numbers.
A more formal argument. When x < -1, we know
(a) (x^3) < -1 ---- (x^3) is a function that gets more & more negative as x gets larger.
(b) 0 < (3^x) < 1/3 ---- (3^x) will be a positive fraction of magnitude 1/3 or less.
S = big negative + small positive = negative. S must be negative when x < -1. Combined, the statements are sufficient.

Answer = C

Please let me know if you have any question on this.

Mike :)
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
https://gmat.magoosh.com/

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3835
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:00 pm
Location: Milpitas, CA
Thanked: 1854 times
Followed by:523 members
GMAT Score:770

by Anurag@Gurome » Sun Jan 22, 2012 6:27 pm
dell2 wrote:S = x^3 + 3^x

Is S > 0?

(1) x < 0

(2) | x | > 1


OA : C
(1) If x = -1, then S = (-1)^3 + 3^(-1) = -1 + 1/3 = -2/3; here S < 0
If x = -1/2, then S = (-1/2)^3 + 3^(-1/2) = -1/8 + 1/√3 = positive; here S > 0
(as √3 < 8 so, 1/√3 > 1/8)
No definite answer; NOT sufficient.

(2) |x| > 1
If x = -2, then S = (-2)^3 + 3^(-2) = -8 + 1/9 = negative; here S < 0.
If x = 2, then S = (2)^3 + 3^(2) = 8 + 9 = positive; here S > 0.
No definite answer; NOT sufficient.

Combining (1) and (2), x is a negative number such that |x| > 1
If x = -3/2, then then S = (-3/2)^3 + 3^(-3/2) = -27/8 + (1/√3)^3 = -27/8 + (1/3√3); here S < 0
It can be seen that combining the info, S will always be < 0; SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is C.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/