A line with the equation y = px + q is reflected over the line y = x. Is the reflection of this line parallel to the line y = mx + n?
(1) m = p + 2
(2) m = 3p
(1) m = p + 2
(2) m = 3p
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
Absco wrote:A line with the equation y = px + q is reflected over the line y = x. Is the reflection of this line parallel to the line y = mx + n?
(1) m = p + 2
(2) m = 3p

Anurag@Gurome wrote:Absco wrote:A line with the equation y = px + q is reflected over the line y = x. Is the reflection of this line parallel to the line y = mx + n?
(1) m = p + 2
(2) m = 3p
Slope of line y = px + q is p and slope of line y = mx + n is m.
(1) m = p + 2 implies there is just one equation and 2 variables. Until we know the values of m and p, we cannot say whether reflection of y = px + q is parallel to the line y = mx + n. So, (1) is NOT SUFFICIENT.
(2) m = 3p again implies there is just one equation and 2 variables. Until we know the values of m and p, we cannot say whether reflection of y = px + q is parallel to the line y = mx + n. So, (2) is NOT SUFFICIENT.
Combining (1) and (2), 3p = p + 2 implies p = 1 and m = 3. So, now we can find the angle that each of the two lines make with x -axis. Hence, combining the statements is SUFFICIENT to answer the question.
The correct answer is C.
You are assuming here that the two lines with slopes m and p must be perpendicular in order to be parallel after reflecting one of the lines about the line y=x. I'm not sure if this assumption is valid.aneesh.kg wrote:Let's try to find the slope of the reflected line.
Thus, Slope of the line = [((q/1 - p) - q)/ (q/1 - p) - (0))] = 1/p
So, in order to find if this line is parallel to y = mx + c or not, we need to see if 1/p = m or not. Or, Is mp = 1 ?
Hello Anurag - I did not understand the question or the solution - What does the term "reflection mean" ? I was assuming that the line y=x is actually perpendicular to y=px+q therefore slope of y=x; M" = 1 and slope of y=px+q; p= -1 ?? And thus question is asking if this line y=px+q is parallel to line y=mx+n; i.e. m= -1 ?Anurag@Gurome wrote:Absco wrote:A line with the equation y = px + q is reflected over the line y = x. Is the reflection of this line parallel to the line y = mx + n?
(1) m = p + 2
(2) m = 3p
Slope of line y = px + q is p and slope of line y = mx + n is m.
(1) m = p + 2 implies there is just one equation and 2 variables. Until we know the values of m and p, we cannot say whether reflection of y = px + q is parallel to the line y = mx + n. So, (1) is NOT SUFFICIENT.
(2) m = 3p again implies there is just one equation and 2 variables. Until we know the values of m and p, we cannot say whether reflection of y = px + q is parallel to the line y = mx + n. So, (2) is NOT SUFFICIENT.
Combining (1) and (2), 3p = p + 2 implies p = 1 and m = 3. So, now we can find the angle that each of the two lines make with x -axis. Hence, combining the statements is SUFFICIENT to answer the question.
The correct answer is C.
In coordinate geometry, reflection over or with respect to a line means as if there is a invisible mirror placed on the line. For example, in the following figure P' is the reflection of P with respect to the line l, meaning as if there is an invisible mirror along the line l on which P' is the reflection of P.subhakam wrote:Hello Anurag - I did not understand the question or the solution - What does the term "reflection mean" ?
...
I totally misunderstood the question. Appreciate if you could explain it to me


New here Create free account